Bug#410682: tomcat5.5: Duplicates log messages in catalina.DATE.log and catalina_DATE.log

Package: tomcat5.5 Version: 5.5.20-2 Severity: important It seems catalina_DATE.log gets all the tomcat logging that goes to catalina.DATE.log and the logging from my ROOT webapp with swallowOutput=true, while catalina.DATE.log only gets the tomcat logging. My webapp uses commons logging as a

Re: Anybody working on Sun's JavaHelp .jar (GPLed)

privately and professionally rather overloaded, and I did not create an ITP on purpose for this reason, i.e. the field should be free for you. Eric PS: if you create an ITP, you might want to let me know: I gathered some emails from the JPackage mailing list, concerning packaging of JavaHelp, which might

Bug#402642: java-package: does not work with sun jre-1.6

Package: java-package Version: 0.28 Severity: important Just for you to notice. Have altered a few files and it work correctly. Cna provide a patch if you want. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing-proposed-updates APT policy: (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'),

Bug#385257: No matching plugin was found

spit an error?!). Cheers, Eric package: java-package version: 0.28 priority: important I just installed an etch machine on a core duo, dowloaded java_ee_sdk-5-linux.bin from SUN site and run java-package. This is what happens now: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Desktop$ make-jpkg java_ee_sdk-5

Re: libpgjava 7.4.7 source package: missing configure file

under Debian. By rebuilding the package, you make sure that all steps and dependencies are correct. Cheers, Eric Pablo G. Milano wrote: Hi, I'm unfamiliar with java, but I need to make some modifications to libpgjava 7.4.7 in order to cope with postgres 7.4 BIGINT index issue. I downloaded

Re: No symlinks for javaws?

myself *g* Sounds anyway like a (small) bug in java-package to me. Eric Thanks Eric, it's obviously been handled correctly on your system but not on mine for some reason. /usr/sbin/update-alternatives --list javaws This gives no output on my system. But the javaws executable is located

Problem with SVN and DOS end-of-line

, as said using UNIX-style end-of-lines is not an option. Thanks, Eric -- Eric de France, d'Allemagne et de Navarre ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java

Re: Problem with SVN and DOS end-of-line

OK, forget about this: 'svn propdel svn:eol-style 02_default_properties.patch' did the trick... Eric Hello, the file '02_default_properties.patch' in 'svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/svn/pkg-java/trunk/libjgoodies-forms-java/debian/patches' had DOS end-of-lines because it patches a file

Bug#348139: java-package: in postinst script the function program_alternative() misuse update-alternative

Barry Hawkins wrote: Eric Valette wrote: [...] Postins fails because update-alternative --install parameters are incorrect. I chnaged to update-alternatives \ --install $program $program \ $j2se_base/bin/$program $priority [...] Eric, Thanks for your use of Debian

Bug#342341: eclipse: too many unneeded dependencies

if these binaries are policy or just a help, but perhaps, in deed, it would allow to remove some dependencies (which, I think, is always good, independent of all belief wars). Just my 2 cents, Eric -- Eric de France, d'Allemagne et de Navarre ___ pkg

Removing files from CVS on Alioth

Hi, it appears that for the next version of libforms-java, hopefully to be uploaded, certain files in the debian directory are not required anymore (one patch and a TODO file). As CVS doesn't offer the possibility to remove a file, how should this be handled? Thanks, Eric -- Eric de France

Bug#335883: libbatik-java: Fop in batik depends on libavalon-framework-java = 4.2.0

Package: libbatik-java Version: 1.6-1 Severity: normal Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Eric Lavarde [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libbatik-java: Fop in batik depends on libavalon

Re: RFS for libforms-java

Hi, OK, I activated a chroot (unstable) and did it again, this time everything should be fine. I just have an issue with ant vs. libant1.6 and gjdoc/javadoc (see http://bugs.debian.org/324884). How strict are you on this one? : Eric -- N/A signature

<    1   2