On 2014-02-16 22:50:40, Andrew Kelley wrote:
Thank you for your feedback. I have addressed everything so far (in my own
repository).
Great, I'll look at it.
I tried to create a repository on alioth like this:
$ ssh git.debian.org /git/pkg-multimedia/setup-repository libebur128.git
Am Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:00:48 +0200
schrieb Riku Voipio riku.voi...@iki.fi:
Thanks Peter for explaining, this was how I ended up the suggestion
in the bug.
I see. In that case, I'll have to leave the package as it until
something along those lines is implemented.
Yes. The ideal
caps_0.9.20-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
caps_0.9.20-1.dsc
caps_0.9.20.orig.tar.bz2
caps_0.9.20-1.debian.tar.xz
caps_0.9.20-1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:34:36 +0100
Source: caps
Binary: caps
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.9.20-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:43:16AM +0100, Thomas Orgis wrote:
Am Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:00:48 +0200
schrieb Riku Voipio riku.voi...@iki.fi:
Thanks Peter for explaining, this was how I ended up the suggestion
in the bug.
I see. In that case, I'll have to leave the package as it until
On 2014-02-16 22:50:40, Andrew Kelley wrote:
Thank you for your feedback. I have addressed everything so far (in my own
repository).
Looks good. Some comments on d/copyright: Please just use the short
name and not MIT License (Expat). For Modified BSD License this is
BSD-3-clause. You can also
2014-02-17 15:35 GMT+01:00 Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:18 PM, mira-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org
wrote:
The following commit has been merged in the pristine-tar branch:
commit 2a6a3866aebac28701e169bb9b86ce114c6adba7
Author: Jaromír Mikeš
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 5:14 AM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Team.
I prepared ste-plugins package a LADSPA plugins from Fons Adriaensen.
Please can somebody review and possibly upload.
DM flag would be great ;)
I also searching for 2nd uploader :)
best regards
Hi
2014-02-17 16:31 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 5:14 AM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Team.
I prepared ste-plugins package a LADSPA plugins from Fons Adriaensen.
Please can somebody review and possibly upload.
DM flag would be
Source: cmus
Severity: important
Hi,
your package fails to build from source against libav 10 (currently
packaged in experimental). This bug will become release-critical
at some point when the libav10 transition starts.
Migration documentation can be found at
https://wiki.libav.org/Migration/10
Source: gmerlin-avdecoder
Severity: important
Hi,
your package fails to build from source against libav 10 (currently
packaged in experimental). This bug will become release-critical
at some point when the libav10 transition starts.
Migration documentation can be found at
Source: gnash
Severity: important
Hi,
your package fails to build from source against libav 10 (currently
packaged in experimental). This bug will become release-critical
at some point when the libav10 transition starts.
Migration documentation can be found at
https://wiki.libav.org/Migration/10
Package: harvid
Severity: important
Hi,
your package fails to build from source against libav 10 (currently
packaged in experimental). This bug will become release-critical
at some point when the libav10 transition starts.
Migration documentation can be found at
Source: k3b
Severity: important
Hi,
your package fails to build from source against libav 10 (currently
packaged in experimental). This bug will become release-critical
at some point when the libav10 transition starts.
Migration documentation can be found at
https://wiki.libav.org/Migration/10
Source: linphone
Severity: important
Hi,
your package fails to build from source against libav 10 (currently
packaged in experimental). This bug will become release-critical
at some point when the libav10 transition starts.
Migration documentation can be found at
Package: vice
Severity: important
Hi,
your package fails to build from source against libav 10 (currently
packaged in experimental). This bug will become release-critical
at some point when the libav10 transition starts.
Migration documentation can be found at
https://wiki.libav.org/Migration/10
Package: lynkeos.app
Severity: important
Hi,
your package fails to build from source against libav 10 (currently
packaged in experimental). This bug will become release-critical
at some point when the libav10 transition starts.
Migration documentation can be found at
FYI: The status of the x42-plugins source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 20140115-1
Current version: 20140115-3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 1:56 PM, fsate...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
The annotated tag, debian/0.0.2-1 has been updated
to f973a39b9f883387618687b078b1f6ef594a196d (tag)
from 22596c5027bc0069cb3d0151440bd174fcb59c92 (which is now obsolete)
Jaromír (and anyone else that had
ste-plugins_0.0.2-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ste-plugins_0.0.2-1.dsc
ste-plugins_0.0.2.orig.tar.bz2
ste-plugins_0.0.2-1.debian.tar.xz
ste-plugins_0.0.2-1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
binary:ste-plugins is NEW.
source:ste-plugins is NEW.
Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of
the override file. It is ok otherwise, so please be patient. New
packages are usually added to the override file about once a week.
Package: idjc
Severity: important
Hi,
your package fails to build from source against libav 10 (currently
packaged in experimental). This bug will become release-critical
at some point when the libav10 transition starts.
Migration documentation can be found at
https://wiki.libav.org/Migration/10
Source: gpac
Severity: important
Hi,
your package fails to build from source against libav 10 (currently
packaged in experimental). This bug will become release-critical
at some point when the libav10 transition starts.
Migration documentation can be found at
https://wiki.libav.org/Migration/10
Source: gst-libav1.0
Severity: important
Hi,
your package fails to build from source against libav 10 (currently
packaged in experimental). This bug will become release-critical
at some point when the libav10 transition starts.
Migration documentation can be found at
Package: guvcview
Severity: important
Hi,
your package fails to build from source against libav 10 (currently
packaged in experimental). This bug will become release-critical
at some point when the libav10 transition starts.
Migration documentation can be found at
Source: libquicktime
Severity: important
Hi,
your package fails to build from source against libav 10 (currently
packaged in experimental). This bug will become release-critical
at some point when the libav10 transition starts.
Migration documentation can be found at
Package: silan
Severity: important
Hi,
your package fails to build from source against libav 10 (currently
packaged in experimental). This bug will become release-critical
at some point when the libav10 transition starts.
Migration documentation can be found at
Source: lives
Severity: important
Hi,
your package fails to build from source against libav 10 (currently
packaged in experimental). This bug will become release-critical
at some point when the libav10 transition starts.
Migration documentation can be found at
https://wiki.libav.org/Migration/10
Source: lightspark
Severity: important
Hi,
your package fails to build from source against libav 10 (currently
packaged in experimental). This bug will become release-critical
at some point when the libav10 transition starts.
Migration documentation can be found at
2014-02-17 17:57 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 1:56 PM, fsate...@users.alioth.debian.org
wrote:
The annotated tag, debian/0.0.2-1 has been updated
to f973a39b9f883387618687b078b1f6ef594a196d (tag)
from
Source: libphash
Severity: important
Hi,
your package fails to build from source against libav 10 (currently
packaged in experimental). This bug will become release-critical
at some point when the libav10 transition starts.
Migration documentation can be found at
Package: mplayer2
Version: 2.0-701-gd4c5b7f-2
Severity: important
Hi,
your package fails to build from source against libav 10 (currently
packaged in experimental). This bug will become release-critical
at some point when the libav10 transition starts.
Migration documentation can be found at
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-02-17 17:57 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 1:56 PM, fsate...@users.alioth.debian.org
wrote:
The annotated tag, debian/0.0.2-1 has been updated
to
The package liblo runs a test suite at build time. This test suite
failed in mipsel (but not mips)[1]. I tried to reproduce the issue in
eder.d.o but it passed.
Liblo does use unaligned access (liblo had to be removed from sparc
for this reason).
But I'm confused as to why does the buildd error
2014-02-17 20:09 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com
wrote:
2014-02-17 17:57 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 1:56 PM, fsate...@users.alioth.debian.org
wrote:
The
eq10q_2.0~beta5.1~repack0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
eq10q_2.0~beta5.1~repack0-1.dsc
eq10q_2.0~beta5.1~repack0.orig.tar.gz
eq10q_2.0~beta5.1~repack0-1.debian.tar.xz
eq10q_2.0~beta5.1~repack0-1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Andreas Barth a...@ayous.org wrote:
* Felipe Sateler (fsate...@gmail.com) [140217 20:33]:
The package liblo runs a test suite at build time. This test suite
failed in mipsel (but not mips)[1]. I tried to reproduce the issue in
eder.d.o but it passed.
Liblo
Processing control commands:
forwarded -1 https://github.com/x42/harvid/pull/2
Bug #739304 [harvid] FTBFS with libav10
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/x42/harvid/pull/2'.
--
739304: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739304
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Is there a reason to decide one way or the other to put dh_installexamples
into the debian/rules file versus creating a debian/package.examples file?
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 5:05 PM, siret...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
The following commit has been merged in the experimental branch:
Hi,
there are too many SPAM mails on this pkg-multimedia-maintainers list.
Please manually filter the mails from non-subscribers (excluding
white-listing known good addresses).
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian Ubuntu Developer
___
Package: shotdetect
Severity: important
Hi,
your package fails to build from source against libav 10 (currently
packaged in experimental). This bug will become release-critical
at some point when the libav10 transition starts.
Migration documentation can be found at
Package: yorick-av
Severity: important
Hi,
your package fails to build from source against libav 10 (currently
packaged in experimental). This bug will become release-critical
at some point when the libav10 transition starts.
Migration documentation can be found at
Source: qmmp
Severity: important
Hi,
your package fails to build from source against libav 10 (currently
packaged in experimental). This bug will become release-critical
at some point when the libav10 transition starts.
Migration documentation can be found at
https://wiki.libav.org/Migration/10
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Sebastian Ramacher sramac...@debian.orgwrote:
Please include the patch in the Debian package.
OK I have done this and the copyright update. I also added your
GNUInstallDirs patch. Please take a look and make sure it is correct.
Lintian told me to add
2014-02-17 22:37 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com
wrote:
2014-02-17 21:00 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 03:25:08PM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Reimar Döffinger
reimar.doeffin...@gmx.de wrote:
What would constitute a constructive comment?
Ideally I am interested in making mplayer work against the libavcodec
that we have in Debian,
On 2014-02-17 18:36:45, Andrew Kelley wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Sebastian Ramacher
sramac...@debian.orgwrote:
Please include the patch in the Debian package.
OK I have done this and the copyright update. I also added your
GNUInstallDirs patch. Please take a look and make
libav_10~beta1-2_source+amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libav_10~beta1-2.dsc
libav_10~beta1.orig.tar.xz
libav_10~beta1-2.debian.tar.gz
libav-tools_10~beta1-2_amd64.deb
libav-dbg_10~beta1-2_amd64.deb
libavutil53_10~beta1-2_amd64.deb
Your message dated Tue, 18 Feb 2014 03:20:11 +
with message-id e1wfbeb-0006im...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#738599: fixed in libav 6:10~beta1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #738599,
regarding fails to decode H264: Different bit depth between chroma and luma is
not implemented
Am Montag, den 17.02.2014, 17:19 -0500 schrieb Andrew Kelley:
Is there a reason to decide one way or the other to put
dh_installexamples into the debian/rules file versus creating a
debian/package.examples file?
Well, actually you need to have the call to dh_installexamples in
debian/rules in
50 matches
Mail list logo
