csoundqt is marked for autoremoval from testing

csoundqt 0.9.2.1-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-06-16 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 823316: stk: contains non-free Steinberg ASIO library ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

csound is marked for autoremoval from testing

csound 1:6.05~dfsg1-7 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-06-16 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 823316: stk: contains non-free Steinberg ASIO library ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

stk is marked for autoremoval from testing

stk 4.5.0-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-06-16 It is affected by these RC bugs: 823316: stk: contains non-free Steinberg ASIO library ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: RFS: audacious/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1 and audacious-plugins/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 06:03:18PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > > Now, umh, with `push debian/%(bpo_tag)s would be what I usually do > > without a branch. > > Ohhh, I think I'm starting to understand now. So what happens that > the local master branch gets ahead of the remote without

Bug#823953: inkscape: PDF+Latex export completely broken

control: tag -1 upstream control: notfound -1 0.91-5~bpo8+1 control: found -1 0.91-5 control: forwarded -1 https://qbugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/1417470 On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:05:43AM -0600, Daniel Blaschke wrote: > Package: inkscape > Version: 0.91-5~bpo8+1 bpo bugs are not to be sent

Re: RFS: audacious/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1 and audacious-plugins/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1

On 10 May 2016 at 11:42, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 03:17:30PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: >> So, I'm going to use a local bpo of sndio instead (also because yours >> would not be nice to upload due to the +2. why 2 identical changelog >> entries??), and

Re: RFS: audacious/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1 and audacious-plugins/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1

On 10 May 2016 at 11:17, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Sorry for the delay, these days are crazy for me That's life, right?! :-) > On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 02:05:17PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >> I've just purged that repo and uploaded a bpo of libsndio to mentors. > >

Re: supercollider 3.7.0 in alioth to try

On 10 May 2016 at 17:43, Dan S wrote: > 2016-05-10 21:33 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : >> On 10 May 2016 at 17:05, Dan S wrote: >>> 2016-05-10 18:23 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : On 6 May 2016 at

Re: supercollider 3.7.0 in alioth to try

2016-05-10 21:33 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : > On 10 May 2016 at 17:05, Dan S wrote: >> 2016-05-10 18:23 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : >>> On 6 May 2016 at 13:32, Dan S wrote: 2016-05-04 16:09

Re: supercollider 3.7.0 in alioth to try

On 10 May 2016 at 17:05, Dan S wrote: > 2016-05-10 18:23 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : >> On 6 May 2016 at 13:32, Dan S wrote: >>> 2016-05-04 16:09 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : On 4 May 2016 at

Re: supercollider 3.7.0 in alioth to try

2016-05-10 18:23 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : > On 6 May 2016 at 13:32, Dan S wrote: >> 2016-05-04 16:09 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : >>> On 4 May 2016 at 11:57, Dan S wrote: 2016-04-26 19:23

Bug#823963: ardour: Incorrect balance behaviour for stereo bus sends

Package: ardour Version: 1:4.7~dfsg-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, It is possible to set invalid balance values for stereo bus sends in ardour4. How to reproduce: add a stereo bus and an audio track to your project. Add a "New aux send" to your audio track, open mixer window. Click the

Bug#823589: mplayer: Please create dummy package for upgrades from jessie

Package: mplayer Version: 2:1.3.0-1 Followup-For: Bug #823589 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu yakkety ubuntu-patch In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: * Add mplayer2 transitional package to fix upgrades (LP: #1580268) So, I noticed

Re: supercollider 3.7.0 in alioth to try

On 6 May 2016 at 13:32, Dan S wrote: > 2016-05-04 16:09 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : >> On 4 May 2016 at 11:57, Dan S wrote: >>> 2016-04-26 19:23 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : On 25 April 2016 at

Bug#823953: inkscape: PDF+Latex export completely broken

Package: inkscape Version: 0.91-5~bpo8+1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, in inkscape 0.91, PDF+Latex export creates a multipage pdf where every element/line of the svg appears on a different pdf page, thus rendering this functionality completely useless. This used to work fine in version

audacious-plugins_3.7.2-2~bpo8+1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:audacious-plugins is NEW. binary:audacious-plugins-data is NEW. source:audacious-plugins is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are

audacious_3.7.2-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:audacious is NEW. binary:audacious-dev is NEW. binary:libaudcore3 is NEW. binary:libaudgui3 is NEW. binary:libaudqt0 is NEW. binary:libaudtag2 is NEW. source:audacious is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload

Bug#823940: blender: please make the build reproducible (timestamps)

Source: blender Version: 2.77.a+dfsg0-3 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed that blender could

Processing of audacious_3.7.2-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes

audacious_3.7.2-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: audacious_3.7.2-1~bpo8+1.dsc audacious_3.7.2-1~bpo8+1.debian.tar.xz audacious_3.7.2-1~bpo8+1_amd64.deb audacious-dev_3.7.2-1~bpo8+1_amd64.deb libaudcore3_3.7.2-1~bpo8+1_amd64.deb

Processing of audacious-plugins_3.7.2-2~bpo8+1_amd64.changes

audacious-plugins_3.7.2-2~bpo8+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: audacious-plugins_3.7.2-2~bpo8+1.dsc audacious-plugins_3.7.2-2~bpo8+1.debian.tar.xz audacious-plugins_3.7.2-2~bpo8+1_amd64.deb audacious-plugins-data_3.7.2-2~bpo8+1_all.deb Greetings,

Processing of audacious-plugins_3.7.2-2~bpo8+1_amd64.changes

audacious-plugins_3.7.2-2~bpo8+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: audacious-plugins_3.7.2-2~bpo8+1.dsc audacious-plugins_3.7.2-2~bpo8+1.debian.tar.xz audacious-plugins_3.7.2-2~bpo8+1_amd64.deb audacious-plugins-data_3.7.2-2~bpo8+1_all.deb

Processing of audacious_3.7.2-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes

audacious_3.7.2-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: audacious_3.7.2-1~bpo8+1.dsc audacious_3.7.2-1~bpo8+1.debian.tar.xz audacious_3.7.2-1~bpo8+1_amd64.deb audacious-dev_3.7.2-1~bpo8+1_amd64.deb libaudcore3_3.7.2-1~bpo8+1_amd64.deb

Re: RFS: audacious/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1 and audacious-plugins/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 03:17:30PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > So, I'm going to use a local bpo of sndio instead (also because yours > would not be nice to upload due to the +2. why 2 identical changelog > entries??), and try to build audacious again. Tomorrow first thing in > the morning

Re: RFS: audacious/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1 and audacious-plugins/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1

Sorry for the delay, these days are crazy for me On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 02:05:17PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > It seems I backported libsndio in a fugue state Feb 9th! I found a > libsndio-dev_1.0.1-2~bpo8+1_amd64.deb in my local repo. I can't find > an email notification from

Hi Friend,The Work of God

Hi, I'm diagnosed with laryngeal Cancer,I want to give all my resources to you for Charity work. Let this be my last offering. Respond with this ref. FresherHelp44. so i know you got this.God bless you abundantly. Dennis Williams. ___