It looks like the crystalhd drivers are buggy with newer kernel
releases. I opt for removing the dkms package. I will do this over the
weekend.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 4:52 PM, thomas schorpp
thomas.scho...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28.02.2013 20:41, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 21:38:54 +0100, thomas schorpp wrote:
So no technical reasons to drop the package?
Until and unless the driver is in mainline, there's every reason to drop
it.
Cheers,
Julien
I just checked
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 1:11 AM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 1:11 AM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
FYI, I uploaded a new version of XBMC. I'm notifying you all
-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into
experimental
To: Debian XBMC Packaging Team
pkg-xbmc-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org, Andres Mejia
ame...@debian.org
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 17:56:50 -0500
Source: xbmc
Binary: xbmc xbmc-bin xbmc
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
FYI, I uploaded a new version of XBMC. I'm notifying you all because
of a major change. This version of XBMC will be built and run using
XBMC's internal copy of FFMpeg (the 10.2 branch of FFMpeg that is).
Due
Wow, amazing! Good job guys!
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, that's just fine for experimental IMO
Am 12.10.2012 18:02 schrieb Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com:
Am Sonntag, den 07.10.2012, 11:13 -0700 schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
Next
cf1fbcb4af6757ef1208ea27d7f1ebb097890497
Author: Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com
Date: Wed May 23 10:30:39 2012 -0400
Update libav-doc doc base. (Closes: #674139)
diff --git a/debian/libav-doc.doc-base b/debian/libav-doc.doc-base
index 014a90b..337f506 100644
--- a/debian/libav-doc.doc-base
+++ b
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org wrote:
Unless I'm mistaken, on April 7th, while the discussion between me and
the pkg-multimedia-maintainer was going on, you've both renewed
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On 12-05-13 at 07:48pm, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
the 'old' libavcodec53, which a lot of applications link against,
becomes uninstallable because of the strict internal dependencies:
Depends: libavutil51 (= 4:0.8.1-0ubuntu1)
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de wrote:
Package: libavcodec53
Severity: important
I have now prepared a new upstream snapshot of libav at
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/libav.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/experimental.
In this new
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de wrote:
On So, Mai 13, 2012 at 20:43:08 (CEST), Andres Mejia wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de
wrote:
Package: libavcodec53
Severity: important
I have now prepared a new
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
Am Freitag, den 11.05.2012, 16:10 -0400 schrieb Andres Mejia:
Could it use vo-aacenc as an alternate?
I've never considered. It's not like vo-aacenc is a drop-in replacement
for faac, their APIs appear quite
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
Am Samstag, den 12.05.2012, 11:29 -0400 schrieb Andres Mejia:
I just glanced over the changes to this. To be on the safer side, the
symbols needed by handbrake and provided in audioconvert.c should be
built from
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 13.05.2012, 19:48 +0200 schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
a) We could simply drop the strict internal dependencies.
They served as a nice shelter against package mixture wth d-m.o packages
in the past. But
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 1:39 AM, Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br wrote:
Package: libavcodec-dev
Severity: important
Hi.
The libavcodec-dev package is missing
/usr/include/libavcodec/audioconvert.h.
Audioconvert is not a public header in either libav or ffmpeg. What is
suppose to be used
On May 12, 2012 2:22 AM, Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br wrote:
Hi there.
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 1:39 AM, Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br
wrote:
Package: libavcodec-dev
Severity: important
Hi
owner 456165 pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
retitle 456165 ITP: handbrake -- Rips and encodes DVDs
stop
The package is now being worked on. See [1].
1. http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/handbrake.git
___
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 4:58 AM, rbrito-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
The branch, master has been created
at de1f9ddeef0932713c9d436d3ce28db14ebe9b39 (commit)
- Shortlog
commit
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:07 AM, Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br wrote:
Hi, all.
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem with that is that audioconvert.h is not part of the public
API. Moreover, most of the APIs have already been removed in
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
* Package name: libmkv
Version : 0.6.5.1
Upstream Author : saint...@gmail.com
* URL : https://github.com/saintdev/libmkv
* License : GPLv2+
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com wrote:
I just noticed that libmkv was written specifically for handbrake. In
this case, I wouldn't even bother uploading libmkv separately and just
Late posting but...
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
Am 01.02.2012 18:19, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
Feel free to push what you currently have to git.debian.org, I might
find some time next week to have a closer look. Maybe we can get it to
use
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
Dear Rogerio,
As I am a brand new dad, I want to transcode videos of my newborn son to
formats that other family members can see and the first thought of mine
was to do the job with handbrake.
First of all,
On May 4, 2012 4:43 PM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
libav - x264 - libav
AFAICT the x264 frontend uses libav whereas libav uses the libx264 shared
library. So theortically (!) this issue could be solved by two separate
source packages for the x264 frontend and the library.
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:44 AM, Pino Toscano p...@debian.org wrote:
Package: libav
Version: 6:0.8.1-7
Severity: important
Hi,
libav 6:0.8.1-7 reenables the use of opencv... which itself uses libav
libraries. This currently makes libav unbuildable on mipsel and
hurd-i386, and generically
On May 3, 2012 9:24 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 02:26:27PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I've drafted a message that I'd like to send to Christian publicly
Cc:-ing this list. It is attached to this mail for review by the
pkg-multimedia team.
On May 3, 2012 9:30 AM, Pino Toscano p...@debian.org wrote:
Alle giovedì 3 maggio 2012, Andres Mejia ha scritto:
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:44 AM, Pino Toscano p...@debian.org wrote:
Package: libav
Version: 6:0.8.1-7
Severity: important
Hi,
libav 6:0.8.1-7 reenables the use
On May 3, 2012 10:20 AM, Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 3, 2012 9:30 AM, Pino Toscano p...@debian.org wrote:
Alle giovedì 3 maggio 2012, Andres Mejia ha scritto:
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:44 AM, Pino Toscano p...@debian.org wrote:
Package: libav
Version: 6:0.8.1-7
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
Package: libavcodec53
Version: 6:0.8.1-5
Severity: grave
Your package is not installable, because it depends on both
libavutil51 (= 6:0.8.1-5) and libavutil51 ( 5:0.8.1-99) which cannot
possibly be both fulfilled.
--
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote:
On Apr 27, 2012, at 7:21 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 26.04.2012 18:18, schrieb Hans-Christoph Steiner:
When I read statements like Uploading ffmpeg would be a bad idea, it
seems to me that the Debian-multimedia
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote:
On Apr 28, 2012, at 3:25 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 3:08 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at
wrote:
On Apr 26, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:18
was filed against the ffmpeg package:
#660786: ffmpeg: please migrate /etc/ffserver.conf to /etc/avserver.conf
It has been closed by Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com.
[...]
From: Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Bug#660786: ffmpeg: please migrate /etc/ffserver.conf to
/etc
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
After clarification that the bug
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668308 is indeed a
bug with dmo, I believe it will be useful to mark such bugs with a
usertag.
I propose such bugs be marked
Could the headers not have simply been moved to /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu?
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Debian FTP Masters
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org wrote:
gpac-dbg_0.4.5+svn4019~dfsg0-3_amd64.deb
to main/g/gpac/gpac-dbg_0.4.5+svn4019~dfsg0-3_amd64.deb
Err, I mean /usr/include/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH).
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com wrote:
Could the headers not have simply been moved to /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu?
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Debian FTP Masters
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org wrote
On Apr 18, 2012 3:12 AM, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Christian Marillat maril...@debian.org
wrote:
* Another broken package uploaded...
What is broken and why?
Please elaborate.
References:
On Apr 13, 2012 2:04 AM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 01:07:44PM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
Stefano, I think it's time to give you a clear answer, which is:
Hi Alessio et
On Apr 13, 2012 7:35 PM, Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org wrote:
On Do, 2012-04-12 at 14:26 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 01:07:44PM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
Stefano, I think it's time to give you a clear answer, which is:
Hi Alessio et al.,
thank you
On Apr 19, 2012 11:30 AM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
Am 19.04.2012 17:09, schrieb Andres Mejia:
Filing a bug against devede would have been the appropriate step taken
to resolve this issue, not uploading a different package somewhere else.
Sorry, but *which* issue. Has
On Apr 17, 2012 2:32 PM, Debian FTP Masters
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org wrote:
Accepted:
devede_3.21.0-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/d/devede/devede_3.21.0-1.debian.tar.gz
devede_3.21.0-1.dsc
to main/d/devede/devede_3.21.0-1.dsc
devede_3.21.0-1_all.deb
to
On Apr 12, 2012 10:38 AM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
Dear Stefano,
Am 12.04.2012 14:26, schrieb Stefano Zacchiroli:
I'd appreciate your feedback on it.
thank you very much for the draft.
Same here, thank you.
However, sadly, I doubt this will lead us anywhere. I do
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 10:17 AM, AV Linux i...@bandshed.net wrote:
Hi,
Thanks very much for taking time to reply, I'm relieved to see it is still
there in the links in good company with the other mentioned projects. BTW
the Studio-to-go link no longer has a domain so perhaps should be removed
schrieb Andres Mejia:
Just updated the FAQ in the wiki. See
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/FAQ
These are updates about dmo. In particular, they answer the common
questions of do we coordinate with dmo (no) do we support packages
from dmo (no) and is dmo a part of Debian
I see the strict internal dependencies was added long ago. [1] Is this
something that is still needed? I imagine each of the libraries don't
need these strict dependencies with one another anymore, and if it
still does, it should be bug. libpostproc will soon be it's own
package. Any thoughts on
On Apr 4, 2012 7:07 AM, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org wrote:
Ave Stefano, hi all,
and sorry for the delay, I chose to wait in silence and see if things
could
get better without becoming unfriendly.
However now, after having seen this [1], I am convinced he's kidding us.
On Mon, Mar
On Apr 4, 2012 2:20 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 01:07:44PM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
Stefano, I think it's time to give you a clear answer, which is:
Yes, we consider debian-multimedia.org more harmful than useful
to the Debian
Package: x264
Version: 2:0.120.2171+git01f7a33-3
Severity: wishlist
Reporting this to open discussion on this. It looks like 10 bit h264 encoding
is becoming the norm. We should allow some way to support both 10 bit and 8 bit
builds of x264, possibly making use of the alternatives system.
--
Just updated the FAQ in the wiki. See
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/FAQ
These are updates about dmo. In particular, they answer the common
questions of do we coordinate with dmo (no) do we support packages
from dmo (no) and is dmo a part of Debian (no). Improvements are
welcome.
--
~
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
The override needs to be updated for all these packages.
libavdevice-extra-53_0.8.1-4_all.deb: package says section is oldlibs, override
says libs.
libavdevice-extra-53_0.8.1-4_all.deb: package says priority is extra, override
says optional.
-template-perl 1.45-2
ii man-db 2.6.1-2
ii xz-utils 5.1.1alpha+20110809-3
-- no debconf information
From 9d3349195b9618aab5f7e1c67e4094400edc5392 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:19:50 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Add
Any package distributed through Debian is not suppose to use embedded
libav libraries. This seemed like an unwritten rule, and people in
debian-devel had this understanding as well. Now that it seems libav
gets at least 10 security fixes every point release, I believe this
merits adding checks for
On Mar 29, 2012 2:39 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:26 AM, ceros-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org
wrote:
The following commit has been merged in the libav-extra branch:
commit 1b7ca8d372075118db12c8f1d8fb565eca874183
Author: Andres Mejia amejia
On Mar 28, 2012 2:14 AM, Christian Marillat maril...@free.fr wrote:
Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Christian,
So I'll ask one more time and if the answer is no (or you don't
respond), I won't bother you anymore. For the packages in DMO that can
now be uploaded to Debian
On Mar 28, 2012 3:48 AM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 8:44 PM, ceros-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org
wrote:
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit ea819ac5706a98397a834d8f9a6972d92210e969
Author: Andres Mejia amejia
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de wrote:
Hi Andres,
you need to Cc: the bug submitter if you expect answers.
For libvdpau please see
debian/patches/vdpau-module-searchpath.patch
where I sanitized the searching to look in \${ORIGIN}/vdpau/,
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Christian Marillat maril...@free.fr wrote:
Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com writes:
On Mar 22, 2012 11:29 AM, Christian Marillat maril...@free.fr wrote:
Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com writes:
On Mar 21, 2012 2:26 AM, Christian Marillat maril...@free.fr
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 6:49 AM, Luca Falavigna ftpmas...@debian.org wrote:
Hi!
Copyright says:
Those intending to use this software module in hardware or software
products are advised that this use may infringe existing patents.
This conflicts with http://www.debian.org/legal/patent,
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe the libav-tools package should be split and the separate
binary programs each be installed in their own package. Out of all
On Mar 23, 2012 4:16 AM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
Am 23.03.2012 03:47, schrieb Debian FTP Masters:
* Add Build-Depends: libmp4v2-dev (= 1.9.1).
This should probably get reverted, as GPL'ed and MPL'ed code linked
together results in something unredistributable by
FYI, here is Christian's latest response.
~ Andres
-- Forwarded message --
From: Christian Marillat maril...@free.fr
Date: Mar 23, 2012 11:09 AM
Subject: Re: Duplicate Packages from Debian archive in DMO
To: dmo-discuss...@debian-multimedia.org
Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com
2012/2/10 Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com:
Am 09.02.2012 16:49, schrieb Sebastian Dröge:
Not obsoleted (yet). faac supports 1-6 channels and the main, lc, ssr
and ltp profiles. vo-aacenc only supports 1-2 channels and the lc
profile.
OK, so it's good enough for the usual CD ripping.
On Mar 22, 2012 11:29 AM, Christian Marillat maril...@free.fr wrote:
Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com writes:
On Mar 21, 2012 2:26 AM, Christian Marillat maril...@free.fr wrote:
Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com writes:
[...]
Also I upload my packages more quickly than Debian. 3.99.0
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Stuart Prescott
stu...@nanonanonano.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andres,
Thanks. This really helps.
glad to be of assistance :)
I was going to ask, could you do a query on sid showing the source
packages available in dmo
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com wrote:
Here are some of the comments Reinhard said on IRC. Placing them here
for recording purposes.
[02:47] siretart amejia: in the merged case, I
updated in Debian instead (though this would
mean he would have to work with the team).
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:26 AM, Christian Marillat maril...@free.fr wrote:
Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
Hi,
This has been a question that's been asked in the debian-devel mailing
list
On Mar 21, 2012 4:40 PM, Micah Gersten mic...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On 03/21/2012 06:40 AM, Andres Mejia wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com
wrote:
Do you volunteer to do at least the first uploads for libav and
libav-extra for ubuntu as well?
Yes
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 21, 2012 4:40 PM, Micah Gersten mic...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On 03/21/2012 06:40 AM, Andres Mejia wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:12 AM
/liba/libav/libswscale-extra-2_0.8.1-2_all.deb
libswscale2_0.8.1-2_amd64.deb
to main/liba/libav/libswscale2_0.8.1-2_amd64.deb
Changes:
libav (5:0.8.1-2) experimental; urgency=low
.
[ Andres Mejia ]
* Merge libav-extra packages to libav. (Closes: #658084)
* Provide only libavcodec
I should have worded that better.
Testers wanted. Please help test the new libav packages.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok everyone. Feel free to starting testing the new libav packages.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Debian FTP Masters
ftpmas
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Stuart Prescott
stu...@nanonanonano.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Just to put some real data on packages that are in both Debian and
debian-multimedia.org I extracted the appended data from UDD.
I suspect that many will
2012/3/21 Andriy Beregovenko j...@jet.kiev.ua:
Hi,
I finished update package 'crtmpserver'.
This is major update from the point of view of upstream update, but
debian package changes are insignificant.
So, please, upload updated version of package.
--
Best regards,
Andriy
0xBDDBDAE3
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Stuart Prescott
stu...@nanonanonano.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Just to put some real data on packages that are in both Debian and
debian
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de wrote:
Package: libva1
Version: 1.0.15-4
Severity: normal
Hi,
please use a search path for the DRI modules that contains both
/usr/lib/triplet
Here are some of the comments Reinhard said on IRC. Placing them here
for recording purposes.
[02:47] siretart amejia: in the merged case, I think the -dev
packages can have tight dependencies on the library packages
[02:48] siretart amejia: also, I think only libavcodec changes, so
in that case
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Dave Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net wrote:
Source: libav
Version: 4:0.8.1-1
Severity: normal
gcc -Llibavcodec -Llibavdevice -Llibavfilter -Llibavformat -Llibavutil
-Llibpostproc -Llibswscale -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--warn-common
Ok, here are the changes to libav to include libav-extra so far. Just
tested these and they provide a smooth upgrade with libav/libav-extra
packages currently in unstable. avconv can use either libavcodec or
libavcodec-extra package and it works like it should. None of the
other packages were
Hi,
This has been a question that's been asked in the debian-devel mailing
list and among the Debian multimedia team recently. Why are packages
already in the Debian archive still being uploaded to DMO?
For example, there is lame, x264, and xvidcore which have been
uploaded to the Debian archive,
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:48 AM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
Hi Andres,
Am 17.03.2012 18:48, schrieb Debian FTP Masters:
* Add hardened build flags excluding -O2 and -g.
I don't quite get it. These packages already have dh compat 9 enabled and
thus have the hardeneing
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
Am 18.03.2012 00:42, schrieb Andres Mejia:
libdvdcss-installer can be found at
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/libdvdcss-installer.git
Any comments/concerns?
I like the idea behind this script
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
Am 19.03.2012 03:59, schrieb Andres Mejia:
Though the build time is increased for libav, ultimately, this change
would be better as the buildd network would not have to cope with
building from two source packages
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
Am 19.03.2012 13:53, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
Should stable be supported?
I think so, but not necessarily without minor changes to the packaging. A
package with minor adaption on backports.d.o would be sufficient
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On 12-03-19 at 08:59am, Andres Mejia wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Fabian Greffrath
fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
Am 19.03.2012 03:59, schrieb Andres Mejia:
Though the build time is increased for libav
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
Am 19.03.2012 13:41, schrieb Andres Mejia:
x264 set -O3 by default. Us setting -O2 would have overridden that.
And with -g, x264 doesn't set -g by default (I presume because full
optimizations are enabled). Even so
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
Am 19.03.2012 14:38, schrieb Andres Mejia:
I made the changes to filter out building of static libs for extra
packages. See [1]. Note that I rebased the changes from current
master, so if you checked out this branch
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org wrote:
Am Samstag, den 17.03.2012, 19:42 -0400 schrieb Andres Mejia:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 7:32 PM, ceros-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org
wrote:
The branch, master has been created
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de wrote:
Package: libva1
Version: 1.0.15-4
Severity: normal
Hi,
please use a search path for the DRI modules that contains both
/usr/lib/triplet/dri
/usr/lib/dri
While we can (hopefully) fix the Debian packages to ship
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On 12-03-17 at 02:49pm, Andres Mejia wrote:
That pretty much means libdvdcss can be compiled on Debian down to
old-stable (if backports is used) and Ubuntu oneiric. For supporting
Ubuntu suites before oneiric, we could use
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On 12-03-18 at 12:22pm, Andres Mejia wrote:
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk
wrote:
On 12-03-17 at 02:49pm, Andres Mejia wrote:
That pretty much means libdvdcss can be compiled on Debian
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
The override file needs to be updated for the following packages.
i965-va-driver_1.0.16-1_all.deb: package says section is oldlibs, override says
libs.
i965-va-driver_1.0.16-1_all.deb: package says priority is extra, override says
optional.
This is now
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
The override file needs to be updated for the following packages.
libvo-aacenc-dev_0.1.2-1_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override
says extra.
libvo-aacenc0_0.1.2-1_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override
says extra.
These
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
The override file needs to be updated for the following packages.
libvo-amrwbenc-dev_0.1.2-1_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional,
override says extra.
libvo-amrwbenc0_0.1.2-1_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override
says extra.
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
The override file needs to be updated for vainfo.
vainfo_1.0.15-4_amd64.deb: package says section is utils, override says libs.
vainfo is a utility program, not a library.
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Here is what I propose in order to provide the lib*extra* packages
from the libav source package. [1] It essentially has libav building
the extra packages, thus no longer having to rely on a seperate source
package. This change ensures the regular and the extra packages are
built for all 'flavors'
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Chris S. cs.swen...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As a new Debian user, I believe I read the following document about
multimedia codes:
http://wiki.debian.org/MultimediaCodecs
However, as noted on the following two pages,
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:37 PM, ceros-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 15c3fdd600ad05440cfc3b9016897c523de68c0d
Author: Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Mar 17 14:36:37 2012 -0400
Update changelog.
diff
Author: Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Mar 17 19:29:40 2012 -0400
Create new package for libdvdcss-installer.
---
--
libdvdcss-installer packaging
___
pkg
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 5:15 PM, ceros-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 0479ff2df5488335ee5d35de014a616410ec0add
Author: Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com
Date: Fri Mar 16 17:14:20 2012 -0400
Set release as UNRELEASED
This thread is from debian-devel. Would anyone here who had a lot of
experience working (or dealing) with Marillat like to respond?
~ Andres
-- Forwarded message --
From: Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org
Date: Mar 5, 2012 2:41 AM
Subject: Re: Unofficial repositories on
Ah yes sorry. Alioth was down when I uploaded and I forgot to push my
changes afterwards.
I can't push until later tonight.
~ Andres
On Feb 13, 2012 8:56 AM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
Am 31.01.2012 08:55, schrieb Fabian Greffrath:
Thanks, Andres. Could you please push your
1 - 100 of 196 matches
Mail list logo
