Re: [SCM] rtmpdump packaging branch, master, updated. debian/2.3-1-1-gdc4494b

2010-07-08 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 07.07.2010 15:45, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: I consider the questions about the upstream status and acceptance one of the, if not the most important part of the patch documentation. It would have saved this mail thread if it was available in the first place. Sorry, I didn't mean to upset

Re: [SCM] rtmpdump packaging branch, master, updated. debian/2.3-1-1-gdc4494b

2010-07-07 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 02:39:02 (EDT), fabian-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit dc4494b88db0f1b82f981dfdc7b12f1cc1616d7f Author: Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com Date: Tue Jul 6 08:38:57 2010 +0200 Link the

Re: [SCM] rtmpdump packaging branch, master, updated. debian/2.3-1-1-gdc4494b

2010-07-07 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 06.07.2010 20:29, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: this patch looks rather intrusive. is it really worth the efford? do you plan upstreaming it? Well, in my eyes this small patch is not really an efford. I just wanted to avoid code duplication by static linking of 4 executables while we have a

Re: [SCM] rtmpdump packaging branch, master, updated. debian/2.3-1-1-gdc4494b

2010-07-07 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 09:11:19 (EDT), Fabian Greffrath wrote: Am 06.07.2010 20:29, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: this patch looks rather intrusive. is it really worth the efford? do you plan upstreaming it? Well, in my eyes this small patch is not really an efford. I just wanted to avoid code