user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 596351 squeeze-will-remove
kthxbye
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 15:44:07 +, Neil Williams wrote:
Bearing in mind Chris' previous comment:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596351#40
If the above is not possible, I return to
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 610288 squeeze-will-remove
kthxbye
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 08:03:26 +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
Package: thin
Version: 1.2.4-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
When using Rails, thin ignores the
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 22:05 -0500, Christopher Lunsford wrote:
This package wasn't in Lenny, has relatively low popcon, no reverse
dependencies and has only ever been uploaded twice. I'll look at
removing it from Squeeze over the weekend if this hasn't been resolved
before then.
FYI: The status of the capistrano source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.5.9-1
Current version: (not in testing)
Hint: http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/adsb
# 20110117; done 20110118
The script that generates this mail tries to extract
Antono Vasiljev dijo [Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 01:53:55PM +0200]:
Hello, All.
I cloned svn repo with git-svn and experimented a little bit.
(...)
Almost every big ruby project use git today. Why should we use SVN?
So. I would like to know your cons/pros about switching to git.
Its my
Excerpts from Lucas Nussbaum's message of Mon Jan 17 21:41:15 +0200 2011:
I think so, yes. All the docs refer to it, the new processes need to be
defined, etc, etc. For what benefit? OK, git is faster, and I prefer git
for new projects too.
It's easier to contribute and live in