I sent the message below to misc@ but obviously no-one there runs
Hiawatha.
===
Installed from my ISP's mirror.
Starting hiawatha results in:
Warning: can't write PID file /usr/local/var/run/hiawatha.pid.
There is no file of that name found by locate.
There is no directory var/run in /usr/local/
Changing /usr/local/ by adding var/run/ lets hiawatha write the pid
file.
A note in the pkg message that that needs to be done would be nice.
R/
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 08:48:13 +1100, Rod Whitworth wrote:
I sent the message below to misc@ but obviously no-one there runs
Hiawatha.
===
Installed
.
Regards,
Rod/
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:25:18 -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
On 01/21/15 23:14, Rod Whitworth wrote:
For ages I have I have selected the snapshot version when installing a new
copy of
Postfix.
Never had a problem until now on 5.6
Working on a clean disk installed an out
For ages I have I have selected the snapshot version when installing a new copy
of Postfix.
Never had a problem until now on 5.6
Working on a clean disk installed an out-of-the-box setup.
Then installed Postfix snapshot. The one with no options. It didn't finish
cleanly.
I thought I had
I've been doing testing of various packages leading up to 5.3.
Yesterday I clean installed the 5.3beta that has a file date on the
.iso 8 Feb. My kindly ISP has i386 packages with similar dates. (Kindly
is what I call an ISP who gives me unlimited unmetered access to a well
maintained mirror)
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 23:53:27 +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 05:30:31PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 04:56:15PM -0600, Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote:
Do these:
Vulnerability Note VU#625617
Alert (TA13-010A)
apply to the IcedTea in packages?
I see lots of help for porters and users in this venue and there are
several Good-Guys involved.
It just happens that Stuart Henderson, who suffers fools more gladly
than most and seems to be always helping beginners, has a birthday
tomorrow (well, April 10 to avoid TZ errors) and I think he
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 18:36:04 -0700, Kyle Markley wrote:
Hello,
GCC 4.7.0 was just released, and I have been able to build it - with a
few caveats -
for OpenBSD 4.8 x86_64.
If you would like to do things properly you should be building on
current.
4.8 is out-of-service as far as support
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 22:07:52 +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
I'm wondering if someone is actually using make readmes, or link-categories...
I'm thinking of killing those targets, they are purely convenience stuff,
and I don't think they serve a real purpose these days.
(if anything, readmes or
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:29:10 + (UTC), Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2011-10-21, Rod Whitworth glis...@witworx.com wrote:
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:23:28 -0400, Lawrence Teo wrote:
Are you sure that the above changes are what you really want?
I don't have access to my build machine ATM to do
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 10:37:18 -0400, Lawrence Teo wrote:
The only change is the registration_file value, and the sentence in the
comments will not be orphaned at all. Hopefully this makes sense and addresses
your concerns.
Thanks for giving me the whole picture. As Stu said earlier I'm not
used
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:23:28 -0400, Lawrence Teo wrote:
- # Registration file:
- # Where to store the current registrations.
- # An empty value means we do not save registrations. Make sure that
+ # Memory settings
+@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ user = nobody
# the specified directory path does
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:21:42 +0200, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
Michael Warmuth wrote:
How should this be fixed? Use posix_memalign to align mbuf?
Are there any better POP3 servers with APOP support?
And why did it work before (at least with OpenBSD 4.6)?
mail/dovecot ?
Or Teapop?
*** NOTE ***
http://www.xkcd.com/754/
Marc, note the textbox that pops up when you park the mouse on the
cartoon - that's the bit I thought you'd appreciate given some of your
recent words about make.
;-))
*** NOTE *** Please DO NOT CC me. I am subscribed to the list.
Mail to the sender address that does not
I became a brave and tried installing Cherokee from the most recent
snap package.
pkg_add completed without whining and gave me instructions for modding
the rc* files.
First up I just started the server from a console. No problem - saw the
default page.
Read some docs - saw that they strongly
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:19:38 +0100 (CET), Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Rod Whitworth wrote:
I became a brave and tried installing Cherokee from the most recent
snap package.
pkg_add completed without whining and gave me instructions for modding
the rc* files.
First up I
Further to the Cherokee problem - there is another.
Below quote snipped from my long history of the missing python.
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:31:53 +1100, Rod Whitworth wrote:
If you want to run cherokee on boot, add these lines to /etc/rc.local:
if [ X${cherokee_flags} != XNO ]; then
echo
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:26:53 +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
You're very much alone in there, you know..
The fun thing is that, actually, the package tools are now chatting ways less
and giving more useful information than before.
+1!
*** NOTE *** Please DO NOT CC me. I am subscribed to the list.
I have been running email for a couple of small domains for a few years
using Postfix and Teapop on OpenBSD. No complaints.
I have scripted user addition with passwords etc etc.
Now somebody (important of course) wants webmail.
I went hunting. About the only webmail server I found that did not
On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 13:00:53 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2009/07/04 20:05, Rod Whitworth wrote:
So which imap? Dovecot looked like a candidate. It can use sqlite as
does Roundcube and I know it can do authentication for Postfix so it
looked like a suitable candidate.
I haven't found any
On Sat, 23 May 2009 22:59:14 -0700, Bryan wrote:
I apologize. I was not trying to promote bash, just showing that it
is possible to script something to encrypt using tools that OpenBSD
has already, without installing another package...
Thanks. You do realise though, that bash is a package
On Sat, 23 May 2009 19:56:09 -0700, Bryan wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 18:13, Predrag Punosevac punoseva...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ports,
For the past couple days Colin Percival has worked very hard to fix
crypt so that it can compile on OpenBSD. I am attaching the new version
of crypt-1.1.3
On Sat, 18 Oct 2008 10:51:29 +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 10:14:53AM +1100, Rod Whitworth wrote:
That works like a charm! The best part of your message though was the
explanation of the mechanism that caused the problem. That never was
obvious in my manpage scanning
I am trying something new with a new 4.4 (CDs arrived!) setup and I
have a puzzle.
I have a build-machine and I did an install of all the sets (bar games)
plus the ports tree.
I did make package for a small port I use that never gets onto the
issue CD. Sweet.
I then populated
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:21:26 -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote:
Your use of the terms stable and snapshot above are not particularly
clear, or more likely, I'm just reading it wrong.
The postfix port has stable and snapshot versions to choose from.
I'm building on 4.4 release using 4.4 release ports
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 23:01:56 +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 07:48:09AM +1100, Rod Whitworth wrote:
The postfix port has stable and snapshot versions to choose from.
I'm building on 4.4 release using 4.4 release ports tree and trying to
get a 4.3 release box
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:07:32 -0400, Nick Bender wrote:
And it makes DESCR fit onto my punched cards ;-)
Because 73-80 are for comments. Of course smart people put line numbers
there so if you dropped your card deck it could be machine sorted and put
back in order.
Wow I feel old...
-N
And
On Tue, 6 May 2008 16:12:01 +0800, zong hl wrote:
I use openBSD4.2.
I only found ntop v1.1.
why don't you provide us a newer version?
Thx!
zonghongliang--from china
Because you did not sponsor someone to do it?
Learn some manners. You are very rude.
Rod/
From the land down under:
On Fri, 19 May 2006 08:48:52 +0100, Keith Matthews wrote:
As to the inclusion of X in everything - there have been statements
that it has been decided - decided by whom ? - I've seen no discussion
of the matter on this list.
This is not a democracy. That is probably, outside the competence of
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 08:40:03 +1000, Ian McWilliam wrote:
b. You may not make or distribute copies of the Software, or
electronically transfer the Software from one computer to another or
over a network.
So, even on a permitted operating system, you breach the licence by
dowloading it from
Back on 2004/03/02 I sent an email to the maintainer of
ports/mail/teapop as qupoted below.
I guess you could say it is a maintainer timeout. big evil g]rin The
update is such a simple one that I don't need a fix in the tree - I
have the data needed to be up to date.
Some new users may not.
On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 17:22:42 -0800 (PST), patrick ~ wrote:
I've been looking in some of the
ports I have interest in and I
have noticed a lot of changes in
the patches directory where we are
replacing 'strcmp' instances with
'strncmp'.
e.g.,
/* Made up example of course */
- if
On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 10:35:14 +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
There is nothing wrong with staying with OpenBSD 3.7 or 3.8, but if you
do, stick to the stable branch of the ports tree...
That is a beautifully written heads-up.
I rarely follow current, choosing to drop in on snaps due to a lack of
33 matches
Mail list logo
