Re: Samba as DC on OpenBSD 6.0 is unusable :(

2016-09-12 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
Jeremie Courreges-Anglas writes: > Jeremie Courreges-Anglas writes: > >> Ian McWilliam writes: >> >>> Revision 1.219 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Tue Apr 12 >>> 17:42:09 2016 UTC (4 months, 3 weeks ago) by

Re: Samba as DC on OpenBSD 6.0 is unusable :(

2016-09-09 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
Jeremie Courreges-Anglas writes: > Ian McWilliam writes: > >> Revision 1.219 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Tue Apr 12 >> 17:42:09 2016 UTC (4 months, 3 weeks ago) by jca >> >> Update to samba-4.3.6 >> >> i386 build by danj@,

Re: Samba as DC on OpenBSD 6.0 is unusable :(

2016-09-09 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
Ian McWilliam writes: > Revision 1.219 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Tue Apr 12 > 17:42:09 2016 UTC (4 months, 3 weeks ago) by jca > > Update to samba-4.3.6 > > i386 build by danj@, ok sthen@ > > The changelog between 4.1.23 and 4.3.6 is too

Re: Samba as DC on OpenBSD 6.0 is unusable :(

2016-09-09 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
Jiri B writes: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 08:53:20AM +0300, kasak wrote: > >> I think, if Theo says that we don't need acl, than we don't need acl. He >> knows better. Keeping things simple is very secure and this is good! >> I am very thankful to you for maintaining samba on

Re: Samba as DC on OpenBSD 6.0 is unusable :(

2016-09-09 Thread Jiri B
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 08:53:20AM +0300, kasak wrote: > I think, if Theo says that we don't need acl, than we don't need acl. He > knows better. Keeping things simple is very secure and this is good! > I am very thankful to you for maintaining samba on OpenBSD! Undoubtedly , > OpenBSD is now

Re: Samba as DC on OpenBSD 6.0 is unusable :(

2016-09-09 Thread Ian McWilliam
_ > From: owner-po...@openbsd.org [owner-po...@openbsd.org] on behalf of Jeremie > Courreges-Anglas [j...@wxcvbn.org] > Sent: Friday, 9 September 2016 7:01 AM > To: kasak > Cc: ports@openbsd.org > Subject: Re: Samba as DC on OpenBSD 6.0 is

Re: Samba as DC on OpenBSD 6.0 is unusable :(

2016-09-08 Thread kasak
[j...@wxcvbn.org] Sent: Friday, 9 September 2016 7:01 AM To: kasak Cc: ports@openbsd.org Subject: Re: Samba as DC on OpenBSD 6.0 is unusable :( samba port maintainer here, kasak <ka...@kasakoff.net> writes: Maybe I am doing something wrong ? I have tried to provision domain and got

Re: Samba as DC on OpenBSD 6.0 is unusable :(

2016-09-08 Thread kasak
09.09.2016 00:01, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas пишет: samba port maintainer here, kasak writes: Maybe I am doing something wrong ? I have tried to provision domain and got error that samba was compiled without acl support. On some forums I found advice to use

Re: Samba as DC on OpenBSD 6.0 is unusable :(

2016-09-08 Thread Ian McWilliam
September 2016 7:01 AM To: kasak Cc: ports@openbsd.org Subject: Re: Samba as DC on OpenBSD 6.0 is unusable :( samba port maintainer here, kasak <ka...@kasakoff.net> writes: > Maybe I am doing something wrong ? > > I have tried to provision domain and got error that samba was compile

Re: Samba as DC on OpenBSD 6.0 is unusable :(

2016-09-08 Thread Jiri B
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:01:45PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > Everything is possible, but our lack of ACLs and extended attributes > make OpenBSD a poor choice for samba, even if upstream supports backends > that don't suffer these limitations. From my POV, net/samba is here > first

Re: Samba as DC on OpenBSD 6.0 is unusable :(

2016-09-08 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
samba port maintainer here, kasak writes: > Maybe I am doing something wrong ? > > I have tried to provision domain and got error that samba was compiled > without acl support. > > On some forums I found advice to use "--use-ntvfs" option when provisioning. > > But it

Samba as DC on OpenBSD 6.0 is unusable :(

2016-09-08 Thread kasak
Maybe I am doing something wrong ? I have tried to provision domain and got error that samba was compiled without acl support. On some forums I found advice to use "--use-ntvfs" option when provisioning. But it appeared that samba-tool doesn't know about this option: $ doas samba-tool