Re: [cabfpub] CABG: Follow-up actions to the creation of the new Definitions and Glossary Working Group

I'd like to participate in the Definitions & Glossary Working Group on behalf of the FPKIMA - but please add my government email - wendy.br...@gsa.gov -Original Message- From: Public On Behalf Of Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Public Sent: Monday, April 22, 2024 12:28 PM To:

Re: [cabfpub] For Discussion: S/MIME Working Group Charter

I second the opinion that clientAuth and S/Mime are likely to have a great overlap in validation requirements at least when issuing to persons and PKIs may want to issue both types of certs from the same CA if they are for the same validated individual.. From: Public

Re: [cabfpub] [EXTERNAL] Forbid DTPs from doing Domain/IP Ownership Validation ballot draft

Ryan – I wasn’t at the F2F so missed the entire discussion. But I would also like to understand the rationale for totally banning DTP rather than fixing the audit issue. If it is difficult to audit the DTP, is it any easier to audit the same functionality when done by the CA or is it just

Re: [cabfpub] Naming rules

I think the real question to be answered is what is the purpose of the naming rules in the BR. If the requirement for locality and states are to be able to locate the organization who owns the certificate and if the current naming conventions of a given PKI, whether government or not allows

Re: [cabfpub] Validation WG

Jeremy - Please include Ken and me on the validation WG list. Thanks, wendy From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Jeremy Rowley via Public Sent: Monday, November 7, 2016 11:46 AM To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List Cc: Jeremy Rowley