[issue32843] More revisions to test.support docs

Nick Coghlan added the comment: For TESTFN_NONASCII vs TESTFN_UNICODE (inferred from reading the current code & https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/8b219b2936d767bf6c6c17618db3a7b22fc2e865): * TESTFN_NONASCII guarantees that it can be encoded and decoded with the

[issue32843] More revisions to test.support docs

Cheryl Sabella added the comment: I've made the changes requested. I wasn't sure about: TESTFN_NONASCII - How different from TESTFN_UNICODE? Should I move these out of test.support?: missing_compiler_executable(cmd_names=[]) - It is used only in distutils tests and

[issue32843] More revisions to test.support docs

Change by Cheryl Sabella : -- stage: -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue32843] More revisions to test.support docs

Change by Cheryl Sabella : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +5553 stage: -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___

[issue32843] More revisions to test.support docs

New submission from Cheryl Sabella : Serhiy had made the following comments on the pull request for issue11015, but that PR was merged before applying his requested changes. This issue is to address his concerns. TESTFN_NONASCII - How different from TESTFN_UNICODE? PGO -