[Python-modules-team] Processed: tagging 632508

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # squeeze doesn't have python2.7: tags 632508 + sid wheezy Bug #632508 {Done: Sebastian Ramacher s.ramac...@gmx.at} [src:pythonmagick] pythonmagick: FTBFS with Python 2.7: fatal error: pyconfig.h: No such file or directory Added tag(s) sid and

[Python-modules-team] ipython_0.12-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: ipython-doc_0.12-1_all.deb to main/i/ipython/ipython-doc_0.12-1_all.deb ipython-notebook_0.12-1_all.deb to main/i/ipython/ipython-notebook_0.12-1_all.deb ipython-parallel_0.12-1_all.deb to main/i/ipython/ipython-parallel_0.12-1_all.deb ipython-qtconsole_0.12-1_all.deb to

[Python-modules-team] ipython override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): ipython-parallel_0.12-1_all.deb: package says section is oldlibs, override says python. ipython-parallel_0.12-1_all.deb: package says priority is extra, override says optional. Please

[Python-modules-team] Bug#642326: marked as done (ipython-qtconsole: crash with nonsense command string)

Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:50:57 + with message-id e1rkeux-00043m...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#642326: fixed in ipython 0.12-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #642326, regarding ipython-qtconsole: crash with nonsense command string to be marked as done. This means

[Python-modules-team] Bug#650725: marked as done (ipython: Please offer Python3 version of ipython)

Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:50:57 + with message-id e1rkeux-00043s...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#650725: fixed in ipython 0.12-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #650725, regarding ipython: Please offer Python3 version of ipython to be marked as done. This means that

[Python-modules-team] Processing of python-levenshtein_0.10.1-2_amd64.changes

python-levenshtein_0.10.1-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: python-levenshtein_0.10.1-2.dsc python-levenshtein_0.10.1-2.debian.tar.gz python-levenshtein_0.10.1-2_amd64.deb python-levenshtein-dbg_0.10.1-2_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian

[Python-modules-team] python-levenshtein_0.10.1-2_amd64.changes is NEW

(new) python-levenshtein-dbg_0.10.1-2_amd64.deb extra debug extension for computing string similarities and edit distances(debug extension) The Levenshtein module computes Levenshtein distances, similarity ratios, generalized medians and set medians of Unicode or non-Unicode strings. Because

[Python-modules-team] python-levenshtein_0.10.1-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: python-levenshtein-dbg_0.10.1-2_amd64.deb to main/p/python-levenshtein/python-levenshtein-dbg_0.10.1-2_amd64.deb python-levenshtein_0.10.1-2.debian.tar.gz to main/p/python-levenshtein/python-levenshtein_0.10.1-2.debian.tar.gz python-levenshtein_0.10.1-2.dsc to

[Python-modules-team] Bug#655388: python-numpy: FTBFS: [m68k] unrecognised long double format

Source: python-numpy Version: 1.5.1-3 Tags: upstream Hi, the m68k “long double” format isn’t recognised: […] compile options: '-Inumpy/core/src/private -Inumpy/core/src -Inumpy/core -Inumpy/core/src/npymath -Inumpy/core/src/multiarray -Inumpy/core/src/umath -Inumpy/core/include

[Python-modules-team] Bug#655388: Bug#655388: python-numpy: FTBFS: [m68k] unrecognised long double format

Hi Thorsten, thanks for your report. On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 21:02, Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.de wrote: Source: python-numpy Version: 1.5.1-3 Tags: upstream Hi, the m68k “long double” format isn’t recognised: I'll forward this upstream, but first I'd like to ask you a favour: is there a

[Python-modules-team] Bug#655388: Bug#655388: python-numpy: FTBFS: [m68k] unrecognised long double format

Sandro Tosi dixit: I'll forward this upstream, but first I'd like to ask you a favour: is there a chance you can test numpy from experimental (v.1.6.1)? This way I can provide additional information to developers. I can try that, sure. Also, in case they provide a patch, is there already a

[Python-modules-team] Processing of django-reversion_1.5.1-1_amd64.changes

django-reversion_1.5.1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: django-reversion_1.5.1-1.dsc django-reversion_1.5.1.orig.tar.gz django-reversion_1.5.1-1.debian.tar.gz python-django-reversion_1.5.1-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue

[Python-modules-team] Processing of django-reversion_1.5.1-1_amd64.changes

django-reversion_1.5.1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: django-reversion_1.5.1-1.dsc django-reversion_1.5.1.orig.tar.gz django-reversion_1.5.1-1.debian.tar.gz python-django-reversion_1.5.1-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

[Python-modules-team] django-reversion_1.5.1-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: django-reversion_1.5.1-1.debian.tar.gz to main/d/django-reversion/django-reversion_1.5.1-1.debian.tar.gz django-reversion_1.5.1-1.dsc to main/d/django-reversion/django-reversion_1.5.1-1.dsc django-reversion_1.5.1.orig.tar.gz to

[Python-modules-team] Bug#655388: Bug#655388: python-numpy: FTBFS: [m68k] unrecognised long double format

Sandro Tosi dixit: there a chance you can test numpy from experimental (v.1.6.1)? This way I can provide additional information to developers. ValueError: Unrecognized format (['000', '000', '000', '000', '001', '043', '105', '147', '211', '253', '315', '357', '300', '031', '000', '000', '353',

[Python-modules-team] Processing of django-auth-ldap_1.0.14-1_amd64.changes

django-auth-ldap_1.0.14-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: django-auth-ldap_1.0.14-1.dsc django-auth-ldap_1.0.14.orig.tar.gz django-auth-ldap_1.0.14-1.debian.tar.gz python-django-auth-ldap_1.0.14-1_all.deb

[Python-modules-team] Processing of django-auth-ldap_1.0.14-1_amd64.changes

django-auth-ldap_1.0.14-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: django-auth-ldap_1.0.14-1.dsc django-auth-ldap_1.0.14.orig.tar.gz django-auth-ldap_1.0.14-1.debian.tar.gz python-django-auth-ldap_1.0.14-1_all.deb python-django-auth-ldap-doc_1.0.14-1_all.deb

[Python-modules-team] django-auth-ldap_1.0.14-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: django-auth-ldap_1.0.14-1.debian.tar.gz to main/d/django-auth-ldap/django-auth-ldap_1.0.14-1.debian.tar.gz django-auth-ldap_1.0.14-1.dsc to main/d/django-auth-ldap/django-auth-ldap_1.0.14-1.dsc django-auth-ldap_1.0.14.orig.tar.gz to

[Python-modules-team] Bug#655413: ipython-notebook: Wrong link for saved notebooks

Package: ipython-notebook Version: 0.12-1 Severity: normal Hi, Thanks for packaging this new ipython version with the notebook feature. In the first notebook page, the one listing the saved notebooks, the link to each notebook has 'undefined' appended before the uid of the netbook making these

[Python-modules-team] Bug#655413: Bug#655413: ipython-notebook: Wrong link for saved notebooks

On 01/10/2012 11:21 PM, Yannick Roehlly wrote: Package: ipython-notebook Version: 0.12-1 Severity: normal Hi, Thanks for packaging this new ipython version with the notebook feature. In the first notebook page, the one listing the saved notebooks, the link to each notebook has

[Python-modules-team] Bug#655413: Bug#655413: ipython-notebook: Wrong link for saved notebooks

Hi Julian, Thanks for the answer. Le Tuesday 10 January 2012 23:56:08 Julian Taylor, vous avez écrit : I can't reproduce that issue. Which browser are you using? to my knowledge only firefox and chrome are properly supported. I have the problem with both. what is the content of the body

[Python-modules-team] Processed: I've almost done this

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: owner 647094 mity...@gmail.com Bug #647094 [python-markdown] python-markdown: Please provide a python3 package Owner recorded as mity...@gmail.com. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 647094: