On 5/23/22 22:32, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
I do have an "install: true" on the library product, indeed. But I
thought this was needed to have the library installed on Linux?
It is. If you want to be precise, you can make the value of this
property dependent on the target, e.g. use a Properties
Hi Christian,
On 23/05/22 11:12, Christian Kandeler wrote:
Presumably you have set qbs.install to true somewhere in the library
product, with no per-arch differentiation, leading to a conflict. Since
in the Android case the libraries are not the final build artifact, they
should not get
Hi Rafael,
On 23/05/22 13:38, Raphael Cotty wrote:
Hello,
the libMapperoCore.so should have the architecture name like this:
libMapperoCore-arch.so
What type of product do you use for the MapperoCore?
It's a DynamicLibrary. Is there something special which I should do to
give the compiled
Hello,
the libMapperoCore.so should have the architecture name like this:
libMapperoCore-arch.so
What type of product do you use for the MapperoCore?
Raphael
Le lun. 23 mai 2022 à 10:13, Christian Kandeler
a écrit :
> On 5/22/22 21:57, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
> > So far I've built my Android
On 5/22/22 21:57, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
So far I've built my Android application using Qt 5.12, for the arm
architecture only, and everything has worked fine.
Today I tried migrating to 5.15, which supports multiarch, and I'm
getting an issue: after building all the files for all the four
Hi there!
So far I've built my Android application using Qt 5.12, for the arm
architecture only, and everything has worked fine.
Today I tried migrating to 5.15, which supports multiarch, and I'm
getting an issue: after building all the files for all the four
supported architectures ("Qt
