[Rd] ° not accepted under MacOSX

2010-04-15 Thread Patrick Giraudoux
I am developping a package (pgirmess) that since long does not go through CRAN MacOSX checks, just because I have this command in one of the examples. text(mydata[,3],mydata[,4],paste(round(dirs,0),°),cex=0.7) It makes: ERROR: re-encoding failure from encoding 'latin1'

Re: [Rd] ° not accepted under MacOSX

2010-04-15 Thread Patrick Giraudoux
Prof Brian Ripley a écrit : The subject line is untrue. We recommend in 'Writing R Extensions' that you encode such characters as \u sequences, in this case \u00b0. However, this is more likely to be a locale problem on the check server, as pgirmess checks out on my Mac. In fact, the

[Rd] packages update and error: no package called 'lattice',Error: package 'Hmisc could not be loaded; Tinn-R

2010-09-12 Thread Patrick Giraudoux
Dear all, Since some months after updating packages via update.packages(ask='graphics'), sometimes I loose 'lattice', although already installed. At R restart, I get: Error in loadNamespace(i[[1L]], c(lib.loc, .libPaths())) : there is no package called 'lattice' Error: package 'Hmisc'

[Rd] tag \href not recognised in rd doc

2011-06-05 Thread Patrick Giraudoux
Hi, I have a trouble trying to use \href in a rd doc. See example below: \references{ \href{http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2702787/}{Vaniscotte A., Pleydell D., Raoul F., Quere J.P., Coeurdassier M., Delattre P., Li T., Qian W., Takahashi K., Weidmann J.C., Qiu J., Giraudoux P.

Re: [Rd] tag \href not recognised in rd doc

2011-06-05 Thread Patrick Giraudoux
move to the 2.13.0 ? Patrick On 11-06-05 10:56 AM, Patrick Giraudoux wrote: Hi, I have a trouble trying to use \href in a rd doc. See example below: \references{ \href{http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2702787/}{Vaniscotte A., Pleydell D., Raoul F., Quere J.P., Coeurdassier M

Re: [Rd] tag \href not recognised in rd doc

2011-06-13 Thread Patrick Giraudoux
Back from the field, I have been capable to update to R 2.13.0 today. \href is well recognised with this version and package check run OK. Best, Patrick Le 06/06/2011 10:59, Duncan Murdoch a écrit : On 11-06-06 12:41 AM, Patrick Giraudoux wrote: Le 05/06/2011 22:30, Duncan Murdoch

[Rd] Error in gzfile(file, mode) when checking a package with rcmd check

2011-10-16 Thread Patrick Giraudoux
Hi, For the first time I have a strange behaviour when checking a package before 'packaging' the code. Looks like a file cannot be read. rcmd check pgirmess * using log directory 'U:/Documents and Settings/pgiraudo/Mes documents/R/pgir_arch/pgirmess_arch/On work/pgirmess.Rcheck' * using R

Re: [Rd] Error in gzfile(file, mode) when checking a package with rcmd check

2011-10-16 Thread Patrick Giraudoux
PS: looks like if it has something to do with moving from R 2.13.1 to R 2.13.2, since I cannot even check earlier versions of the pgirmess package that where well checked and compiled under earlier R versions. Le 16/10/2011 09:50, Patrick Giraudoux a écrit : Hi, For the first time I have

Re: [Rd] Error in gzfile(file, mode) when checking a package with rcmd check

2011-10-16 Thread Patrick Giraudoux
since R 2.13.2 has been delivered ? Patrick Le 16/10/2011 11:02, Patrick Giraudoux a écrit : PS: looks like if it has something to do with moving from R 2.13.1 to R 2.13.2, since I cannot even check earlier versions of the pgirmess package that where well checked and compiled under earlier R

Re: [Rd] Error in gzfile(file, mode) when checking a package with rcmd check

2011-11-06 Thread Patrick Giraudoux
the error has to do with the rcmd check command specifically... May it be a bug ? Suppose I am not the only one to have checked a package since R 2.13.2 has been delivered ? Patrick Le 16/10/2011 11:02, Patrick Giraudoux a écrit : PS: looks like if it has something to do with moving from R 2.13.1

Re: [Rd] Error in gzfile(file, mode) when checking a package with rcmd check

2011-11-06 Thread Patrick Giraudoux
Le 06/11/2011 18:57, Uwe Ligges a écrit : On 06.11.2011 18:46, Patrick Giraudoux wrote: Following Uwe Ligges' instructions (off list) I have updated Duncan Murdoch's toolchain, with no effect. The trouble was solved when I moved the package to a directory with a shorter path (U:\Documents

Re: [Rd] Error in gzfile(file, mode) when checking a package with rcmd check

2011-11-06 Thread Patrick Giraudoux
Le 06/11/2011 19:47, Milan Bouchet-Valat a écrit : Le dimanche 06 novembre 2011 à 19:31 +0100, Patrick Giraudoux a écrit : Means Mes documents seems not to be the real cause, but the On Work directory. However, replacing On Work by On_work gives a failure as before. Conclusion: looks like

Re: [Rd] Error in gzfile(file, mode) when checking a package with rcmd check

2011-11-06 Thread Patrick Giraudoux
Le 06/11/2011 20:57, Henrik Bengtsson a écrit : On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Duncan Murdoch murdoch.dun...@gmail.com wrote: On 11-11-06 1:59 PM, Patrick Giraudoux wrote: Le 06/11/2011 19:47, Milan Bouchet-Valat a écrit : Le dimanche 06 novembre 2011 à 19:31 +0100, Patrick Giraudoux

[Rd] Namespace dependency not required

2012-03-18 Thread Patrick Giraudoux
Hi, I am working at adding namespace to my packages, carefully following the doc Writing R extensions and some threads on the web. However I cannot find clear explanation about how to best deal with the import or importFrom functions in the name space. To make it short: To declare

Re: [Rd] Namespace dependency not required

2012-03-18 Thread Patrick Giraudoux
Le 18/03/2012 14:57, Uwe Ligges a écrit : On 18.03.2012 11:21, Patrick Giraudoux wrote: Hi, I am working at adding namespace to my packages, carefully following the doc Writing R extensions and some threads on the web. However I cannot find clear explanation about how to best deal

Re: [Rd] troubles with R CMD check and examples under Ubuntu gutsy

2008-05-05 Thread Patrick Giraudoux
Berwin A Turlach a écrit : G'day Patrick On Mon, 05 May 2008 07:02:23 +0200 Patrick Giraudoux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was used to package pgirmess under Windows with everything OK, but, for the first time, I had a trial this afternoon on Ubuntu 7.10 gutsy (I have a double boot computer

Re: [Rd] troubles with R CMD check and examples under Ubuntu gutsy

2008-05-05 Thread Patrick Giraudoux
I would suggest the following: 1) remove the directore pgirmess.Rcheck 2) run `R CMD check pgirmess' and see if the error occurs again 3) look at pgirmess.Rcheck/pgirmess/R. Does it contain the three files that I mentioned or the original source files. If the latter, check whether

Re: [Rd] Summary of,all undefined globals

2015-12-22 Thread Patrick Giraudoux
Sorry to have polluted this list with this request. I realized later it was more of the scope of r-package-devel (and that this list do exist). Now moved to r-package-devel Patrick Le 22/12/2015 09:23, Patrick Giraudoux a écrit : Dear Listers, Kurt (subject "CRAN packages maintained b

[Rd] Summary of,all undefined globals

2015-12-22 Thread Patrick Giraudoux
Dear Listers, Kurt (subject "CRAN packages maintained by you" sent on 02/07/2015) was mentionning to package maintainers that "with current versions of r-devel, one can get a convenient summary of all undefined globals" and describing how to get a summary conveniently. Now I am using R

[Rd] mrds function integratepdf cannot be found

2020-01-28 Thread Patrick Giraudoux
Hi, Trying to use the function integratepdf of the mrds package, I get this message: |Error in integratepdf(fox.ds$ddf$ds$aux$ddfobj, select = rep(TRUE, nrow(fox.ds$ddf$ds$aux$ddfobj$xmat)), : could not find function "integratepdf" | Has anyone already had this issue ? Maybe the function is

[Rd] path to rtools not updated in R 4.2.3 - line 1: gcc: command not found

2023-04-04 Thread Patrick Giraudoux
Dear listers, I have update to rtools43 and, using R 4.2.3 I have been surprised not to be able to compile packages needing compilation when updating. Looks like the path given in gcc  -I"C:/PROGRA~1/R/R-42~1.3/include" -DNDEBUG -DNTIMER -I./SuiteSparse_config -DUSE_FC_LEN_T

[R-pkg-devel] stringi update

2018-09-09 Thread Patrick Giraudoux
Since weeks the package stringi stays on the following versions: > update.packages(ask='graphics',checkBuilt=TRUE)   There is a binary version available but the source version is later:     binary source needs_compilation stringi  1.1.7  1.2.4  TRUE Do you want to install from

Re: [R-pkg-devel] stringi update

2018-09-15 Thread Patrick Giraudoux
ich are readily available on other mirrors (e.g., https://cran.revolutionanalytics.com). Mark R. Mark Sharp, Ph.D. Data Scientist and Biomedical Statistical Consultant 7526 Meadow Green St. San Antonio, TX 78251 mobile: 210-218-2868 rmsh...@me.com On Sep 10, 2018, at 12:23 AM, Patrick Giraud

Re: [R-pkg-devel] stringi update

2018-09-15 Thread Patrick Giraudoux
> see that the windows binary is still at 1.1.7, suggesting that there's > some build failure. You can see exactly what that is on the CRAN check > page: https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_stringi.html > > Hadley > On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 1:24 AM Patrick Giraudoux > wr

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package Rejection Error Help

2021-04-06 Thread Patrick Giraudoux
I had a similar problem with intepreting "notes" in pgirmess checks. Some are lethal and lead to rejection and some not (just informative comments). Fortunately Uwe has been kind enough to tell me what I missed (I thought that all notes were just "informative"). Would it be possible to call

Re: [R-pkg-devel] lost braces note on CRAN pretest related to \itemize

2024-01-23 Thread Patrick Giraudoux
el a écrit : > On 23 January 2024 at 19:39, Patrick Giraudoux wrote: > | Has anyone an idea about what is going wrong ? > > \item has no braces following it. From a package I submitted today and for > which I still have NEWS.Rd in the editor (indented here): > >\sect

[R-pkg-devel] lost braces note on CRAN pretest related to \itemize

2024-01-23 Thread Patrick Giraudoux
incoming feasibility, Result: Note_to_CRAN_maintainers Maintainer: 'Patrick Giraudoux' Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64 Check: Rd files, Result: NOTE checkRd: (-1) mergeTrackObs.rd:24: Lost braces in \itemize; \value handles \item{}{} directly checkRd: (-1