Re: [R-pkg-devel] New Package Removal because Shared Library Too Large from Debugging Symbols

2024-01-25 Thread Johann Gaebler
It seems some of my emails didn’t make it onto the list, so I just wanted briefly to follow up to say thank you to Dirk, Ivan, Uwe, and Ben for helping with this. Ultimately, following Ivan’s advice, I just added a GitHub action to the repo as a temporary patch to ensure that the signature

Re: [R-pkg-devel] New Package Removal because Shared Library Too Large from Debugging Symbols

2024-01-24 Thread Ivan Krylov via R-package-devel
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 17:14:04 +0100 Tomas Kalibera wrote: > Yes, inside a bigger email, reports can get overlooked, particularly > when in a thread with a rather different subject. It wasn't > overlooked this time thanks to Martin. Then additional thanks goes to Martin, and I'll make sure to

Re: [R-pkg-devel] New Package Removal because Shared Library Too Large from Debugging Symbols

2024-01-22 Thread Tomas Kalibera
On 1/22/24 15:42, Ivan Krylov via R-package-devel wrote: On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 12:30:46 +0100 Tomas Kalibera wrote: Thanks, ported now to R-patched. Thank you! Is it fine to mention problems like this one in the middle of an e-mail, or should I have left a note in the Bugzilla instead? In

Re: [R-pkg-devel] New Package Removal because Shared Library Too Large from Debugging Symbols

2024-01-22 Thread Ivan Krylov via R-package-devel
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 12:30:46 +0100 Tomas Kalibera wrote: > Thanks, ported now to R-patched. Thank you! Is it fine to mention problems like this one in the middle of an e-mail, or should I have left a note in the Bugzilla instead? -- Best regards, Ivan

Re: [R-pkg-devel] New Package Removal because Shared Library Too Large from Debugging Symbols

2024-01-22 Thread Tomas Kalibera
On 1/21/24 09:44, Ivan Krylov via R-package-devel wrote: В Sat, 20 Jan 2024 20:28:00 -0500 Johann Gaebler пишет: most likely there’s some error on my part in how I’ve set up cpp11, but it also seems possible that cpp11 should have detected that that header needs to be included and added it

Re: [R-pkg-devel] New Package Removal because Shared Library Too Large from Debugging Symbols

2024-01-21 Thread Ivan Krylov via R-package-devel
В Sat, 20 Jan 2024 20:28:00 -0500 Johann Gaebler пишет: > most likely there’s some error on my part in how I’ve set up cpp11, > but it also seems possible that cpp11 should have detected that that > header needs to be included and added it automatically Upon further investigation, it's more

Re: [R-pkg-devel] New Package Removal because Shared Library Too Large from Debugging Symbols

2024-01-20 Thread Johann Gaebler
Hi Uwe, You’re completely right. I misunderstood the “additional issue” and thought it was referring to the “NOTE.” Thanks for the help! Best, Hans > Uwe Ligges 於 2024年1月20日 下午7:12 寫道: > > Others have pointed you to the Additional issue, namely LTO. > > But I really cannot resist: > You

Re: [R-pkg-devel] New Package Removal because Shared Library Too Large from Debugging Symbols

2024-01-20 Thread Johann Gaebler
Hi Ivan, Thanks, this is very helpful! You are completely right that I misread the message. I will try including that header in `cpp11.cpp`. Unfortunately, that’s supposed to be programmatically generated, so I’m not sure what the “right" fix is: most likely there’s some error on my part in

Re: [R-pkg-devel] New Package Removal because Shared Library Too Large from Debugging Symbols

2024-01-20 Thread Uwe Ligges
Others have pointed you to the Additional issue, namely LTO. But I really cannot resist: You omitted a line from our message that actually explains it. We wrote: "Do remember to look at the 'Additional issues'." Best, Uwe Ligges On 20.01.2024 20:38, Johann Gaebler wrote: Hi everyone, I

Re: [R-pkg-devel] New Package Removal because Shared Library Too Large from Debugging Symbols

2024-01-20 Thread Ivan Krylov via R-package-devel
В Sat, 20 Jan 2024 14:38:55 -0500 Johann Gaebler пишет: > The issue is that the compiled libraries are too large. Was it in the e-mail? As you quite correctly observed, many other packages get the NOTE about shared library size. It may be not exactly obvious, but the red link saying "LTO" on

Re: [R-pkg-devel] New Package Removal because Shared Library Too Large from Debugging Symbols

2024-01-20 Thread Ben Bolker
Are you sure the issue that CRAN has is the library sizes, and not the issues flagged by the "LTO" platform ? https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/LTO/rar.out I would check with CRAN for clarification before you spend a lot of time trying

Re: [R-pkg-devel] New Package Removal because Shared Library Too Large from Debugging Symbols

2024-01-20 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Johann, On 20 January 2024 at 14:38, Johann Gaebler wrote: | Hi everyone, | | I received the following message regarding `rar` , a package that I put up on CRAN two days ago: | | > Dear maintainer, | > | > Please see the problems shown on | >

[R-pkg-devel] New Package Removal because Shared Library Too Large from Debugging Symbols

2024-01-20 Thread Johann Gaebler
Hi everyone, I received the following message regarding `rar` , a package that I put up on CRAN two days ago: > Dear maintainer, > > Please see the problems shown on > . > > Please correct