On Sun, 7 Jan 2024 10:52:44 +0200
Christiaan Pieterse wrote:
> I have edited my package to have two examples. One uses a small
> self-generated dataset and another uses a big dataset. For the big
> dataset example, I put \donttest{} around it, should this be fine?
The small example is
Good day
I have edited my package to have two examples. One uses a small
self-generated dataset and another uses a big dataset. For the big dataset
example, I put \donttest{} around it, should this be fine?
I only get one note for the new package, available at
On Sat, 6 Jan 2024 15:16:01 +0300
Ivan Krylov wrote:
> Congratulations! I also get the single expected NOTE in my checks.
Apologies for the double e-mail, but I've read the code now, and
wrapping the example of your only function in \dontrun{} will most
likely not be allowed.
Is it really the
On Sat, 6 Jan 2024 13:50:49 +0200
Christiaan Pieterse wrote:
> Is there a way to confirm that this package is ready for submission?
> I submitted it to https://win-builder.r-project.org/ and
> https://mac.r-project.org/macbuilder/submit.html and
> https://builder.r-hub.io/. All of these seem to
Good day
I think I finally have a final package that only yields the expected 'New
submission' note.
The package is available at:
https://github.com/WoutersResearchGroup/R-IO-PS/tree/CRAN-prep.
Is there a way to confirm that this package is ready for submission?
I submitted it to
On 29.12.2023 09:13, Greg Hunt wrote:
Christaan,
The elapsed time note is because CRAN expects that examples will be
configured to run single threaded and some package that you use, or a
package used by a package that you use is multi-threading by default and
using more CPU time than clock
On 28.12.2023 17:00, Christiaan Pieterse wrote:
Hi,
Thank you for showing the difference in the ExampleTradeData. I've fixed
this by adding a .Gitignore file and a "data-raw" folder to load the
ExampleTradeData. I hope I did this correctly. When I check the package (
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 18:00:37 +0200
Christiaan Pieterse wrote:
> I only get 3 notes (see below), and if I run it in PositCloud, it
> crashes or yields the same 1 ERROR and 2 NOTES result as before. Why
> might this be?
Does the PositCloud check crash with "Killed" (most likely out of RAM)
or
Christaan,
The elapsed time note is because CRAN expects that examples will be
configured to run single threaded and some package that you use, or a
package used by a package that you use is multi-threading by default and
using more CPU time than clock time. If you cannot figure out how to
Hi,
Thank you for showing the difference in the ExampleTradeData. I've fixed
this by adding a .Gitignore file and a "data-raw" folder to load the
ExampleTradeData. I hope I did this correctly. When I check the package (
https://github.com/WoutersResearchGroup/R-IO-PS/tree/CRAN-prep) in RStudio.
I
On Sun, 17 Dec 2023 21:48:51 +0200
Christiaan Pieterse wrote:
> Warning in complexity_measures(Mbin, method = "reflections",
> iterations = iterCompl) :
> 'iterations' was changed to 'iterations + 1' to work with an even
> number of iterations
> Killed
If this is happening on Linux, this
Hi Ivan
I have decided to clean up the existing package using a branch, as you
suggested. The branch I've created is available at:
https://github.com/WoutersResearchGroup/R-IO-PS/tree/CRAN-prep.
I've cleaned, built and checked this branch package but I get one error and
2 notes (one is the new
On Sun, 17 Dec 2023 15:29:34 +0200
Christiaan Pieterse wrote:
> But, I've uploaded the newly created package as discussed in my first
> email, available at:
> https://github.com/ChristiaanPieterse/iopspackage2.1.0
Are you sure it wouldn't be better to clean up the existing package
instead of
Hi, thank you for all the responses.
I have uploaded the previous package to GitHub, available at:
https://github.com/WoutersResearchGroup/R-IO-PS . Note that this works when
installed via GitHub using devtools, but is a bit messy. Hence I decided to
start over for CRAN release. If you can help
On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 19:41:16 +0200
Christiaan Pieterse wrote:
> This .R file contained the Roxygen2 comments. (I was very unsure what
> comments to include in this so it might be wrong, I'm unsure)
If you like roxygen2 and would like to keep using it, you're welcome to
keep the roxygen2
And a second good starting place would be:
https://r-pkgs.org
HTH,
-Roy
> On Dec 16, 2023, at 9:48 AM, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Dec 16, 2023, at 9:41 AM, Christiaan Pieterse
>> wrote:
>>
>> I checked the tar file using *R CMD check --as-cran
>>
Christiaan,
You say "errors" but you don't say which.
You say you have a package, but don't provide a source reference.
This makes it awfully hard to say or do anything. In case you are on github
or gitlab or ... it would simply be easiest to share a reference to the
repository. Emailing
> On Dec 16, 2023, at 9:41 AM, Christiaan Pieterse
> wrote:
>
> I checked the tar file using *R CMD check --as-cran
> "iopspackage_2.1.0.tar.gz". *This yielded errors, warnings and notes
> which I don't know how to solve and suspect are due to me setting the file
> up wrong.
A good
Good day fellow developers!
I am trying to upload a package to CRAN that I developed.
I've tried before to upload it but ended up with a package file that is a
complete mess so I decided to restart.
Here are the steps I followed when I created my file:
1. Created a folder on my desktop called
19 matches
Mail list logo
