> On Jan 17, 2024, at 3:46 AM, Josiah Parry wrote:
>
> Hey folks! I've received note that a package of mine is failing tests on
> oldrel.
>
> Check results:
> https://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-oldrel-windows-x86_64/arcgisutils-00check.html
>
> I think I've narrowed it down to the
Thanks for the update!
Ill be submitting a change in the coming days and will report back :)
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 12:12 Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 16 January 2024 at 10:28, Josiah Parry wrote:
> | Oddly making the change has made CI happy.
> |
>
On 16 January 2024 at 10:28, Josiah Parry wrote:
| Oddly making the change has made CI happy.
|
https://github.com/R-ArcGIS/arcgisutils/actions/runs/7543315551/job/20534063601
|
| It may be that the issue was OS related but I'm unsure since only oldrel for
| windows and macos check results
Oddly making the change has made CI happy.
https://github.com/R-ArcGIS/arcgisutils/actions/runs/7543315551/job/20534063601
It may be that the issue was OS related but I'm unsure since only oldrel
for windows and macos check results are published
Doesn't seem to be the case as it moderately easy to check (especially when
you happen to have local images of r-base around anyway):
edd@rob:~$ for v in 4.3.2 4.2.2 4.1.3 4.0.5 3.6.3 3.5.3 3.4.4 3.3.3; do echo -n
"R ${v}: "; docker run --rm -ti r-base:${v} Rscript -e 'as.POSIXct(Sys.Date(),
Hey folks! I've received note that a package of mine is failing tests on
oldrel.
Check results:
https://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-oldrel-windows-x86_64/arcgisutils-00check.html
I think I've narrowed it down to the way that I've written the test which
uses `as.POSIXct(Sys.Date(), tz =
