Re: [R-sig-Debian] Is r2u at 3.4.1? [branch about handling package collisions under Ubuntu/Debian]

2023-08-24 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
My thanks to Ivan for catching that it was of course a legit Ubuntu mirror, which I had missed. Can we (ever so briefly, no need for long posts) get back to the issue at hand: was there a package you wanted to install from r2u, but could not because of another repo or build infelicity. If so,

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Is r2u at 3.4.1? [branch about handling package collisions under Ubuntu/Debian]

2023-08-24 Thread Chris Evans
On 24/08/2023 12:09, Ivan Krylov wrote: On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 11:34:45 +0200 Chris Evans wrote: I see I now have: libmagick++-dev is already the newest version (8:6.9.11.60+dfsg-1.3ubuntu0.22.04.3+esm2) That fits with what you are saying about the current version doesn't it? You're right

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Is r2u at 3.4.1? [branch about handling package collisions under Ubuntu/Debian]

2023-08-24 Thread Ivan Krylov
On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 11:34:45 +0200 Chris Evans wrote: > I see I now have: > libmagick++-dev is already the newest version > (8:6.9.11.60+dfsg-1.3ubuntu0.22.04.3+esm2) > That fits with what you are saying about the current version doesn't > it? You're right that you already had some security

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Is r2u at 3.4.1? [branch about handling package collisions under Ubuntu/Debian]

2023-08-24 Thread Chris Evans
On 24/08/2023 09:58, Ivan Krylov wrote: On Tue, 22 Aug 2023 19:38:57 +0200 Chris Evans wrote: 8:6.9.11.60+dfsg-1.3build2 500     500 http://mirror.infomaniak.ch/ubuntu jammy/universe amd64 Packages Interesting. mirror.infomaniak.ch seems to be a full mirror of Ubuntu repos,

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Is r2u at 3.4.1? [branch about handling package collisions under Ubuntu/Debian]

2023-08-24 Thread Chris Evans
Just to clarify the record: this branched thread is nothing to do with r2u (but I'm definitely coming back to that later, but a new thread I think!) On 24/08/2023 02:14, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: Chris, This got a little long so I'll chop a few things down. On 22 August 2023 at 19:38, Chris

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Is r2u at 3.4.1? [branch about handling package collisions under Ubuntu/Debian]

2023-08-24 Thread Ivan Krylov
On Tue, 22 Aug 2023 19:38:57 +0200 Chris Evans wrote: > 8:6.9.11.60+dfsg-1.3build2 500 >     500 http://mirror.infomaniak.ch/ubuntu jammy/universe amd64 > Packages Interesting. mirror.infomaniak.ch seems to be a full mirror of Ubuntu repos, but

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Is r2u at 3.4.1? [branch about handling package collisions under Ubuntu/Debian]

2023-08-23 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Chris, This got a little long so I'll chop a few things down. On 22 August 2023 at 19:38, Chris Evans wrote: | On 16/08/2023 00:06, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > That can happen, and pinning can help. I would suggest to look at 'apt-cache | > polict nameofthepackagehere'. (See below for

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Is r2u at 3.4.1? [branch about handling package collisions under Ubuntu/Debian]

2023-08-22 Thread Chris Evans
This is definitely tangential to the list: I'm on Ubuntu (22.04.2 LTS) not Debian and I'm sure this is about issues in the Ubuntu package management on my machine, R is only revealing them. The original subject line came from me wondering if my going over to the r2u repository would solve the