Re: [R-sig-phylo] Meaning of Transformed Phylogenetically Dependent Variables in GLS?

2012-01-11 Thread Emmanuel Paradis
Hi Nicolai, Nicolai Cryer wrote on 06/01/2012 01:14: Hi all, I am under the impression that, given two continuous variables that can be shown (Pagel's Lambda or Gittleman Kot's autocorrelation) to be dependent on phylogeny, calling gls(variable1 ~ variable 2, correlation = corStruct) returns

[R-sig-phylo] Meaning of Transformed Phylogenetically Dependent Variables in GLS?

2012-01-05 Thread Nicolai Cryer
Hi all, I am under the impression that, given two continuous variables that can be shown (Pagel's Lambda or Gittleman Kot's autocorrelation) to be dependent on phylogeny, calling gls(variable1 ~ variable 2, correlation = corStruct) returns a regression on derived variables that have been