Re: [R-sig-phylo] "Not of class phylo" error when lapply is used

That’s right Jacob. Tracer will do the same thing if, and unfortunately only if, you predefine taxon sets in BEAUti. The problems with predefining clades in BEAUti are that (1) it is kind of a pain, (2) you often don’t know what the clades will be until after you conduct the analysis (as in

Re: [R-sig-phylo] "Not of class phylo" error when lapply is used

This is cool — so this looks like it will work on a set of posterior trees even if they don’t all share the same topology? Jake > On Apr 10, 2018, at 3:37 AM, jschenk wrote: > > Thank you Graham, Liam, and Emmanuel for your suggestions. Applying the >

Re: [R-sig-phylo] "Not of class phylo" error when lapply is used

Thank you Graham, Liam, and Emmanuel for your suggestions. Applying the .uncompressTipLabel did the trick for my code. If anyone is interested in using the code to identify the 95% HPD for a single node from a set of chronograms, you can find the code here

Re: [R-sig-phylo] "Not of class phylo" error when lapply is used

Hi John, See my comments below. Le 09/04/2018 à 16:46, jschenk a écrit : Hi Folks, I have been banging my head against what appears to be an easy coding problem for a while now and haven’t been able to hack my way out of it. I am running a function to identify a posterior set of node ages

Re: [R-sig-phylo] "Not of class phylo" error when lapply is used

Dear John. You could try running .uncompressTipLabel on the "multiPhylo" object. Let us know if that works. All the best, Liam Liam J. Revell, Associate Professor of Biology University of Massachusetts Boston & Profesor Asociado, Programa de Biología Universidad del Rosario web: