Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-141760915
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rekhajoshm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8842#issuecomment-141760641
retest please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user rekhajoshm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-141760385
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8835#issuecomment-141753867
[Test build #42724 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42724/console)
for PR 8835 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8842#issuecomment-141753849
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8835#issuecomment-141753896
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8835#issuecomment-141753897
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6457#issuecomment-141754266
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6457#issuecomment-141754265
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-141762680
[Test build #42728 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42728/consoleFull)
for PR 8758 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8841#issuecomment-141768398
This LGTM, @srowen can hopefully take a look too.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6457#issuecomment-141754208
[Test build #42726 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42726/console)
for PR 6457 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8842#issuecomment-141753838
[Test build #42725 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42725/console)
for PR 8842 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8842#issuecomment-141753851
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-141760881
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-141812175
[Test build #42729 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42729/consoleFull)
for PR 8843 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8782#issuecomment-141814077
I'm looking at https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8841 now, for
comparison, and noted that the Java overloads there call the scala overloads
directly, rather than call
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8842#discussion_r39932759
--- Diff: .rat-excludes ---
@@ -15,15 +15,15 @@ TAGS
RELEASE
control
docs
-docker.properties.template
-fairscheduler.xml.template
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8842#discussion_r39932853
--- Diff: .rat-excludes ---
@@ -15,15 +15,15 @@ TAGS
RELEASE
control
docs
-docker.properties.template
-fairscheduler.xml.template
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8801#issuecomment-141820394
[Test build #1778 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1778/console)
for PR 8801 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#discussion_r39933300
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/UnsafeSorterSpillReader.java
---
@@ -73,7 +76,9 @@ public void loadNext() throws
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#discussion_r39933628
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/UnsafeSorterSpillReader.java
---
@@ -73,7 +76,9 @@ public void loadNext() throws
Github user justinuang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8833#discussion_r39933648
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -1414,7 +1414,7 @@ def __init__(self, func, returnType, name=None):
def _create_judf(self, name):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-141832065
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-141832056
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-141832823
[Test build #42732 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42732/consoleFull)
for PR 8843 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-141811849
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user tedyu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843
Log error when spill file wasn't deleted
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/tedyu/spark master
Alternatively you can review and
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8782#issuecomment-141815598
@srowen : So the implicit tag is needed because the signature for this one
is different (all the other ones are calling concrete types and this is a
templated type).
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8801#issuecomment-141817299
[Test build #1778 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1778/consoleFull)
for PR 8801 at commit
Github user rekhajoshm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8842#issuecomment-141820464
thanks @rxin and @srowen for your quick review comments. @rxin i need it
for ./dev/run-tests to run correctly. imo nothing under conf/ folder needs to
be checked
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-141820859
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-141820868
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-141823440
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-141823435
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8842#issuecomment-141826632
Running tests including things like RAT checks is usually for preparing a
packaging of Spark. If you have `spark-defaults.conf` in there then you are
also running a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-141826638
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-141826577
[Test build #42729 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42729/console)
for PR 8843 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8844#issuecomment-141841907
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8844#issuecomment-141841910
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-141842474
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-141842480
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-141842738
[Test build #42740 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42740/consoleFull)
for PR 8843 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-141843428
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-141843737
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-141843745
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8839
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8836#issuecomment-141844411
The changes look good to me. Just want to discuss the semantics to enable
quantiles in output. We set a default value for `quantilesCol`, and use
`quantileProbabilities`
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8631#discussion_r39937155
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -493,26 +515,28 @@ private class LeastSquaresAggregator(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8834#issuecomment-141850846
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8631#discussion_r39937140
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -520,28 +544,28 @@ private class LeastSquaresAggregator(
*
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8798#issuecomment-141850806
Thank you @andrewor14 , #8827 hits the right point.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8631#discussion_r39937145
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -520,28 +544,28 @@ private class LeastSquaresAggregator(
*
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8834#issuecomment-141850855
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user chenghao-intel closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8798
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8834#issuecomment-141850959
[Test build #42742 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42742/consoleFull)
for PR 8834 at commit
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8631#discussion_r39937180
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -31,21 +31,30 @@ import org.apache.spark.ml.util.Identifiable
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8805#discussion_r39937272
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/UnsafeExternalSorter.java
---
@@ -254,22 +281,25 @@ public int
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8631#discussion_r39937365
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -510,4 +513,90 @@ class LinearRegressionSuite extends
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8631#discussion_r39937357
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -510,4 +513,90 @@ class LinearRegressionSuite extends
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8631#discussion_r39937361
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -510,4 +513,90 @@ class LinearRegressionSuite extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-141851910
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-141851916
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8844#issuecomment-141842178
[Test build #42739 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42739/consoleFull)
for PR 8844 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-141843427
[Test build #42740 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42740/console)
for PR 8843 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-141843429
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8779#discussion_r39936067
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLContext.scala ---
@@ -477,6 +477,20 @@ class SQLContext(@transient val sparkContext:
SparkContext)
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8839#issuecomment-141843685
LGTM. Merged into master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-141844348
[Test build #42741 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42741/consoleFull)
for PR 8843 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-141844512
[Test build #42732 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42732/console)
for PR 8843 at commit
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8837#issuecomment-141844522
Merged into master. Thanks! We can skip JIRA for minor changes like in this
PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8837
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-141844541
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8834#discussion_r39936250
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/linalg/__init__.py ---
@@ -301,11 +301,14 @@ def __reduce__(self):
return DenseVector, (self.array.tostring(),)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-141844539
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8834#discussion_r39936251
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/linalg/__init__.py ---
@@ -397,10 +400,16 @@ def squared_distance(self, other):
return np.dot(diff, diff)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8842#issuecomment-141846138
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8842#issuecomment-141846118
[Test build #42735 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42735/console)
for PR 8842 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8842#issuecomment-141846139
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user HuJiayin closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8546
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8631#discussion_r39937291
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -598,17 +629,14 @@ private class LeastSquaresCostFun(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8834#issuecomment-141851671
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8631#discussion_r39937401
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -510,4 +513,90 @@ class LinearRegressionSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8834#issuecomment-141851648
[Test build #42742 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42742/console)
for PR 8834 at commit
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8631#discussion_r39937392
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -510,4 +513,90 @@ class LinearRegressionSuite extends
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8631#issuecomment-141851806
Can you merge the master to resolve the conflicts? Also, add warning in
training summary that it ignores the training weights currently (except for the
objective trace).
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8834#issuecomment-141851670
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8843#issuecomment-141852081
[Test build #42743 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42743/consoleFull)
for PR 8843 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8844#issuecomment-141852573
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8844#issuecomment-141852539
[Test build #42739 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42739/console)
for PR 8844 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8844#issuecomment-141852575
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4380#issuecomment-141853176
@litao-buptsse, i will update this soon thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8795#issuecomment-141783385
Your PR is making the whitespace changes which it ideally would not. I am
not proposing whitespace changes; you are.
It wouldn't make sense to commit the changes
Github user maver1ck commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8712#issuecomment-141810492
I think so.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-141781233
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-141781222
[Test build #42728 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42728/console)
for PR 8758 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-141781235
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8712#issuecomment-141810199
Given the discussion in the JIRA, is this to be closed?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8795#issuecomment-141779426
Do you want me to split the pull requests to two - one with code formatting
in table and another for the *unfortunate* excessive spaces? And what JIRA
would that
Github user smartkiwi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8700#issuecomment-141793243
Jenkins please test again
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
