Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13370
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13404#issuecomment-222597618
**[Test build #59639 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59639/consoleFull)**
for PR 13404 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13370#issuecomment-222597634
Thanks - merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13370#discussion_r65126050
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/KeyValueGroupedDataset.scala ---
@@ -204,8 +205,8 @@ class KeyValueGroupedDataset[K, V] private[sql](
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13404#issuecomment-222597423
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13404#issuecomment-222597425
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13404#issuecomment-222597411
**[Test build #59638 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59638/consoleFull)**
for PR 13404 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13404#discussion_r65125923
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/api/java/function/package.scala ---
@@ -22,4 +22,5 @@ package org.apache.spark.api.java
* these
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13404#issuecomment-222596540
**[Test build #59638 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59638/consoleFull)**
for PR 13404 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#issuecomment-222596477
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#issuecomment-222596478
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13404
[MINOR][CORE][DOC Fix description of FilterFunction
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes the wrong description of `FilterFunction`.
```
- * If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#issuecomment-222596375
**[Test build #59631 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59631/consoleFull)**
for PR 12836 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13368#issuecomment-222596139
cc @yhuai @davies , do you still remember why we promote string to
decimal(38, 18) instead of double?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#issuecomment-222595900
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#issuecomment-222595899
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#issuecomment-222595798
**[Test build #59630 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59630/consoleFull)**
for PR 12836 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13370#issuecomment-222595668
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13370#discussion_r65125196
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/KeyValueGroupedDataset.scala ---
@@ -204,8 +205,8 @@ class KeyValueGroupedDataset[K, V]
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13403#issuecomment-222595435
**[Test build #59637 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59637/consoleFull)**
for PR 13403 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13370#discussion_r65125156
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Column.scala ---
@@ -132,6 +130,15 @@ class Column(protected[sql] val expr: Expression)
extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13370#discussion_r65125096
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Column.scala ---
@@ -132,6 +130,15 @@ class Column(protected[sql] val expr: Expression)
extends
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13403
[SPARK-15660][CORE] RDD and Dataset should show the consistent values for
variance/stdev.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In Spark-11490, `variance/stdev` are
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13392#issuecomment-22259
**[Test build #59636 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59636/consoleFull)**
for PR 13392 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13392#discussion_r65124178
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConfSuite.scala ---
@@ -219,4 +220,41 @@ class SQLConfSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13392#discussion_r65124192
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConfSuite.scala ---
@@ -219,4 +220,41 @@ class SQLConfSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13401#issuecomment-222593249
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13401#issuecomment-222593250
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13401#issuecomment-222593159
**[Test build #59629 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59629/consoleFull)**
for PR 13401 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13270#issuecomment-222592978
**[Test build #59635 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59635/consoleFull)**
for PR 13270 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13351#issuecomment-222592731
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13351#issuecomment-222592730
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13351#issuecomment-222592645
**[Test build #59628 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59628/consoleFull)**
for PR 13351 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13392#discussion_r65123693
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConfSuite.scala ---
@@ -219,4 +220,41 @@ class SQLConfSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13392#issuecomment-222592448
LGTM except some style comments
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13270#issuecomment-222592244
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13270#issuecomment-222592243
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13392#discussion_r65123624
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConfSuite.scala ---
@@ -219,4 +220,41 @@ class SQLConfSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13270#issuecomment-222592234
**[Test build #59632 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59632/consoleFull)**
for PR 13270 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13402#issuecomment-222592066
cc @yhuai @zsxwing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13392#issuecomment-222592083
**[Test build #59634 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59634/consoleFull)**
for PR 13392 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13402#issuecomment-222592077
**[Test build #59633 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59633/consoleFull)**
for PR 13402 at commit
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13402
[SPARK-15658][SQL] UDT serializer should declare its data type as udt
instead of udt.sqlType
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When we build serializer for UDT object,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13270#issuecomment-222591642
**[Test build #59632 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59632/consoleFull)**
for PR 13270 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13270#discussion_r65123201
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -212,11 +212,46 @@ class SessionCatalog(
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13392#discussion_r65122900
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConfSuite.scala ---
@@ -17,13 +17,36 @@
package
Github user sitalkedia commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12436#issuecomment-222590636
@kayousterhout - Sure, I will resolve the conflicts. Can you take a cursory
look at the diff and let me know if the approach is reasonable?
---
If your project is
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13392#discussion_r65122821
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConfSuite.scala ---
@@ -17,13 +17,36 @@
package
Github user devaraj-kavali commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11996#issuecomment-222589679
Thanks @kayousterhout.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13400#discussion_r65122095
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -1537,6 +1537,35 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13392#discussion_r65121914
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -937,9 +937,14 @@ object SimplifyConditionals
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13392#discussion_r65121902
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConfSuite.scala ---
@@ -17,13 +17,36 @@
package
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#issuecomment-222586936
**[Test build #59631 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59631/consoleFull)**
for PR 12836 at commit
Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#discussion_r65120888
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1268,6 +1268,82 @@ setMethod("dapplyCollect",
ldf
})
+#' gapply
+#'
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13400#discussion_r65120902
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -1537,6 +1537,35 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends
Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#discussion_r65120891
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1268,6 +1268,82 @@ setMethod("dapplyCollect",
ldf
})
+#' gapply
+#'
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13392#discussion_r65120800
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConfSuite.scala ---
@@ -17,13 +17,36 @@
package
Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#discussion_r65120675
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1268,6 +1268,82 @@ setMethod("dapplyCollect",
ldf
})
+#' gapply
+#'
Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#discussion_r65120665
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/deserialize.R ---
@@ -197,6 +197,31 @@ readMultipleObjects <- function(inputCon) {
data # this is a list of named lists now
}
Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#discussion_r65120671
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1268,6 +1268,82 @@ setMethod("dapplyCollect",
ldf
})
+#' gapply
+#'
Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#discussion_r65120653
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/group.R ---
@@ -142,3 +142,54 @@ createMethods <- function() {
}
createMethods()
+
+#' gapply
+#'
+#'
Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#discussion_r65120620
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/group.R ---
@@ -142,3 +142,54 @@ createMethods <- function() {
}
createMethods()
+
+#' gapply
+#'
+#'
Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#discussion_r65120599
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/worker/worker.R ---
@@ -84,67 +84,78 @@ broadcastElap <- elapsedSecs()
# as number of partitions to create.
numPartitions <-
Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#discussion_r65120565
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/worker/worker.R ---
@@ -84,67 +84,78 @@ broadcastElap <- elapsedSecs()
# as number of partitions to create.
numPartitions <-
Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#discussion_r65120461
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -2011,6 +2011,25 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
}
/**
Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#discussion_r65120457
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/RelationalGroupedDataset.scala ---
@@ -379,6 +383,50 @@ class RelationalGroupedDataset
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13392#discussion_r65120442
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -937,9 +937,14 @@ object SimplifyConditionals
Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#discussion_r65120450
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/objects.scala ---
@@ -325,6 +330,80 @@ case class MapGroupsExec(
}
/**
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13401#issuecomment-222586062
**[Test build #59629 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59629/consoleFull)**
for PR 13401 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#issuecomment-222586065
**[Test build #59630 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59630/consoleFull)**
for PR 12836 at commit
Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#discussion_r65120403
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1268,6 +1268,82 @@ setMethod("dapplyCollect",
ldf
})
+#' gapply
+#'
Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#discussion_r65120399
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1268,6 +1268,82 @@ setMethod("dapplyCollect",
ldf
})
+#' gapply
+#'
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13401#issuecomment-222585795
cc @marmbrus @yhuai @viirya
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13401
[SPARK-15657][SQL] RowEncoder should validate the data type of input object
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR improves the error handling of `RowEncoder`. When
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147#issuecomment-222585528
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147#issuecomment-222585527
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147#issuecomment-222585447
**[Test build #59627 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59627/consoleFull)**
for PR 13147 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13351#issuecomment-222583398
**[Test build #59628 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59628/consoleFull)**
for PR 13351 at commit
Github user tejasapatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13351#issuecomment-222583109
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147#issuecomment-222577825
**[Test build #59627 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59627/consoleFull)**
for PR 13147 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13392#issuecomment-222574008
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13392#issuecomment-222574005
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13392#issuecomment-222573920
**[Test build #59626 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59626/consoleFull)**
for PR 13392 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147#issuecomment-222573545
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user tejasapatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13351#issuecomment-222573544
ok to test.
I ran `sbt core/test:test` locally and it worked. Not sure what failed over
Jenkins because it says `[info] Passed: Total 1832, Failed 0,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147#issuecomment-222573548
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147#issuecomment-222573444
**[Test build #59625 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59625/consoleFull)**
for PR 13147 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13400#issuecomment-222573349
cc @liancheng @andrewor14 @cloud-fan Could you please review this? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13394#discussion_r65113954
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/stats.R ---
@@ -19,12 +19,11 @@
setOldClass("jobj")
-#' crosstab
-#'
#' Computes a pair-wise frequency
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13394#discussion_r65113870
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1069,7 +1080,10 @@ setMethod("first",
#'
#' @param x A SparkDataFrame
#'
-#' @noRd
+#'
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13394#discussion_r65113846
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -629,8 +629,9 @@ setMethod("repartition",
#' @param x A SparkDataFrame
#' @return A StringRRDD of JSON
Github user felixcheung commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13394#issuecomment-222572865
> (c) the change to not require sqlContext
This was in the earlier PR, under the migration guide session.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13392#issuecomment-222571769
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13392#issuecomment-222571771
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13392#issuecomment-222571690
**[Test build #59623 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59623/consoleFull)**
for PR 13392 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13400#issuecomment-222571192
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13400#issuecomment-222571193
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13400#issuecomment-222571127
**[Test build #59624 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59624/consoleFull)**
for PR 13400 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13351#issuecomment-222570792
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13351#issuecomment-222570790
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
1 - 100 of 248 matches
Mail list logo
