Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14517
**[Test build #63739 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63739/consoleFull)**
for PR 14517 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14517
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63739/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14517
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14517
**[Test build #63739 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63739/consoleFull)**
for PR 14517 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14623
Hi, @rxin .
If you think the direction of PR is not appropriate to your initial
intention, please let me know.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14517
**[Test build #63738 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63738/consoleFull)**
for PR 14517 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14517
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14517
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63738/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14517
**[Test build #63738 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63738/consoleFull)**
for PR 14517 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14625
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63737/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14625
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14625
**[Test build #63737 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63737/consoleFull)**
for PR 14625 at commit
Github user vectorijk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13690
Yes, sure. But I'm in a vacation this week. I will keep working on this and
update as soon as possible when I get back next week.
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016, 19:46 Felix Cheung
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14558#discussion_r74694116
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -1143,7 +1139,7 @@ setMethod("minute",
#' @export
#' @examples \dontrun{select(df,
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14625
Sure. The scope is a little bit large, but let me try to go over the
existing join-related test cases in the test suites. We might not be able to
cover all of them in a single ticket. Will try
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14625
**[Test build #63737 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63737/consoleFull)**
for PR 14625 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14558#discussion_r74693897
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/SQLContext.R ---
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ getDefaultSqlSource <- function() {
#' @method createDataFrame default
#' @note
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14558#discussion_r74693887
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -2461,8 +2473,9 @@ setMethod("unionAll",
#' Union two or more SparkDataFrames. This is equivalent to `UNION
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14558#discussion_r74693856
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1146,7 +1147,7 @@ setMethod("head",
#' Return the first row of a SparkDataFrame
#'
-#' @param x
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14558#discussion_r74693823
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -510,9 +510,7 @@ setMethod("registerTempTable",
#'
#' Insert the contents of a SparkDataFrame into a table
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14625
Can we repurpose this ticket to just create test cases for joins in general?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14625
Below is the output of Hive for the same queries. They are the same.
[outputHive.txt](https://github.com/apache/spark/files/416810/outputHive.txt)
---
If your project is set up for
Github user Sherry302 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14556
@srowen Thanks for the new PR and the review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14631
Hi, @davies .
Could you review this PR when you have some time?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14558#discussion_r74693204
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -1497,7 +1493,7 @@ setMethod("soundex",
#' \dontrun{select(df, spark_partition_id())}
#' @note
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14558#discussion_r74693197
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/generics.R ---
@@ -1251,10 +1311,57 @@ setGeneric("year", function(x) {
standardGeneric("year") })
#' @export
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14558#discussion_r74693174
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/generics.R ---
@@ -1277,8 +1384,11 @@ setGeneric("spark.naiveBayes", function(data,
formula, ...) { standardGeneric("s
#'
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14558#discussion_r74693158
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -142,15 +143,6 @@ setMethod("spark.glm", signature(data =
"SparkDataFrame", formula = "formula"),
#' Generalized
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14558#discussion_r74693142
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -298,14 +304,15 @@ setMethod("summary", signature(object =
"NaiveBayesModel"),
#' Users can call \code{summary} to
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14630
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14558#discussion_r74693106
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -346,8 +339,11 @@ setMethod("spark.kmeans", signature(data =
"SparkDataFrame", formula = "formula"
#' Get fitted
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14630
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14558#discussion_r74693097
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -414,11 +411,12 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object =
"KMeansModel"),
#' predictions on new data, and
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14630
Merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14558#discussion_r74693087
--- Diff: .gitignore ---
@@ -77,3 +77,8 @@ spark-warehouse/
# For R session data
.RData
.RHistory
+.Rhistory
--- End diff --
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14558#discussion_r74693053
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -602,14 +599,14 @@ setMethod("spark.survreg", signature(data =
"SparkDataFrame", formula = "formula
# Returns a
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14558#discussion_r74692979
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -3184,6 +3200,7 @@ setMethod("histogram",
#' @param x A SparkDataFrame
#' @param url JDBC database url of
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14631
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63736/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14631
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14631
**[Test build #63736 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63736/consoleFull)**
for PR 14631 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14625
FYI, found the original JIRA who delivered the first 25 auto_join test
cases to Hive: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1642
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14625
@rxin Sure, will do it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14631
**[Test build #63736 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63736/consoleFull)**
for PR 14631 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14631
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14631
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63735/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14631
**[Test build #63735 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63735/consoleFull)**
for PR 14631 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14631
**[Test build #63735 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63735/consoleFull)**
for PR 14631 at commit
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14631
[SPARK-17035][SQL][PYSPARK] Timestamp should preserve microseconds part
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
**Before**
```
>>> from datetime import datetime
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14580
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14580
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63733/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14583
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14580
**[Test build #63733 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63733/consoleFull)**
for PR 14580 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14583
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63732/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14583
**[Test build #63732 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63732/consoleFull)**
for PR 14583 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
These are the last few comments. @shivaram what do you think - with those
fixed we are good to merge this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447#discussion_r74692317
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -533,6 +628,27 @@ setMethod("write.ml", signature(object =
"KMeansModel", path = "character"),
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447#discussion_r74692309
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -533,6 +628,27 @@ setMethod("write.ml", signature(object =
"KMeansModel", path = "character"),
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14527
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63734/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14527
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14527
**[Test build #63734 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63734/consoleFull)**
for PR 14527 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447#discussion_r74692263
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -414,6 +421,94 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object = "KMeansModel"),
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447#discussion_r74692255
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -414,6 +421,94 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object = "KMeansModel"),
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447#discussion_r74692228
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -414,6 +421,94 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object = "KMeansModel"),
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13950
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13950
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63731/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13950
**[Test build #63731 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63731/consoleFull)**
for PR 13950 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14625
@gatorsmile the comment should apply not only to data, but also query (e.g.
what case we are testing ...)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14629
Yes that's a good question. A 0-column DataFrame is valid, though that's a
little different from being able to select 0 columns from a DataFrame. I don't
have a database handy, but can you select no
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14559
Oh... good point. I see the existing `truncate` option isn't documented
either. Yes that should be done in `sql-programming-guide.md`. We can follow up
on this one or make a new small issue for it.
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14607
@davies Can you create a new JIRA ticket for this change? It is a
non-trivial follow-up.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14629
Why do we want to enforce this? It is valid to have a DataFrame without any
columns.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14559
Are the options here documented anywhere?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14527
**[Test build #63734 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63734/consoleFull)**
for PR 14527 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14583
**[Test build #63732 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63732/consoleFull)**
for PR 14583 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14580
**[Test build #63733 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63733/consoleFull)**
for PR 14580 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13950
**[Test build #63731 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63731/consoleFull)**
for PR 13950 at commit
Github user gurvindersingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13950
@vanzin addressed most of your comments. Wondering if the test for location
header is really needed, as it is a very simple two if checks. Let me know if
you feel strongly about that or any
Github user gurvindersingh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13950#discussion_r74690638
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/JettyUtils.scala ---
@@ -186,6 +188,67 @@ private[spark] object JettyUtils extends Logging {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14625
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63730/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14625
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14625
**[Test build #63730 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63730/consoleFull)**
for PR 14625 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14182#discussion_r74689929
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -299,6 +308,91 @@ setMethod("summary", signature(object =
"NaiveBayesModel"),
return(list(apriori =
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14613#discussion_r74689825
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -354,6 +354,24 @@ setMethod("colnames<-",
dataFrame(sdf)
})
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14522
Since this fixes some CRAN check warnings, let's merge this? @shivaram what
do you think?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user zero323 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14614
@srowen By all means. Here you are.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14630
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63727/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14630
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14630
**[Test build #63727 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63727/consoleFull)**
for PR 14630 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14614
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14614
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63729/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14614
**[Test build #63729 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63729/consoleFull)**
for PR 14614 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14625
**[Test build #63730 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63730/consoleFull)**
for PR 14625 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14614
**[Test build #63729 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63729/consoleFull)**
for PR 14614 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14614
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63728/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14614
**[Test build #63728 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63728/consoleFull)**
for PR 14614 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14614
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14614
**[Test build #63728 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63728/consoleFull)**
for PR 14614 at commit
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14557#discussion_r74688576
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -798,6 +798,19 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14557#discussion_r74688557
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -798,6 +798,19 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14557#discussion_r74688550
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -798,6 +798,19 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
