Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19861
**[Test build #84433 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84433/testReport)**
for PR 19861 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19865
Thank you. I think so for this case.
In general, to make global `ev.value` or to pass a global variable to
`consume()` may potentially cause this problem.
As @cloud-fan suggested, I
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19878
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84431/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19881
Please see JIRA. I don't think this is worth doing.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19878
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19878
**[Test build #84431 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84431/testReport)**
for PR 19878 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19881
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19877#discussion_r154729236
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -1832,6 +1832,27 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite extends SparkFunSuite
GitHub user jcuquemelle opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19881
[SPARK-22683][CORE] Add tasksPerExecutorSlot parameter
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
let's say an executor has spark.executor.cores / spark.task.cpus taskSlots
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19717
**[Test build #84438 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84438/testReport)**
for PR 19717 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19717
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19717
**[Test build #84437 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84437/testReport)**
for PR 19717 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19717
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84437/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19717
**[Test build #84437 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84437/testReport)**
for PR 19717 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19880
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84434/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19880
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19880
**[Test build #84434 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84434/testReport)**
for PR 19880 at commit
Github user liyinan926 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19717#discussion_r154726920
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/docker/src/main/dockerfiles/spark-base/Dockerfile
---
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache
Github user rezasafi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19848
Thank you very much @vanzin, @mridulm and @jiangxb1987. I really appreciate
it. I will create PR for branch 2.2 ASAP.
---
-
Github user liyinan926 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19717#discussion_r154724747
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/docker/src/main/dockerfiles/spark-base/Dockerfile
---
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache
Github user liyinan926 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19717#discussion_r154721032
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/k8s/submit/LoggingPodStatusWatcher.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,182 @@
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19840
I'm trying to understand what is
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/python/pyspark/context.py#L191
really achieving. It seems pretty broken to me and feels like the whole
`pythonExec`
Github user liyinan926 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19717#discussion_r154719522
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/docker/src/main/dockerfiles/spark-base/Dockerfile
---
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19870
To ensure no external behavior change, we should use RoundRobinPartitioning
when the expression list is empty, instead of issuing an exception. It will be
also consistent with the existing
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19848
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19848
(There was a conflict in 2.2, open a new PR if you want it there.)
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19848
Merging to master / 2.2.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19880
LGTM
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19873
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19873
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84430/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19879
**[Test build #4003 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4003/testReport)**
for PR 19879 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19873
**[Test build #84430 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84430/testReport)**
for PR 19873 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19879
**[Test build #4003 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4003/testReport)**
for PR 19879 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19879
OK, so another back-port to fix the 2.11 REPL, which should be resolved in
2.12 anyway?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19875
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19854
Ping @kellyzly
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19871
**[Test build #84436 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84436/testReport)**
for PR 19871 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19875
Merged to master
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19871
@HyukjinKwon , for enabling the following test, I'm restructuring ORC tests
now. I'll make a PR today for that.
```
ignore("LZO compression options for writing to an ORC file not
Github user cpalomaressbd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10621
Hi,
One question, maybe is stupid question I dont know and I ask sorry in
advance. We are workin with hortonworks, in the beginning of the project we
were working with HDP 2.4.0
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19871#discussion_r154709256
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSource.scala
---
@@ -568,8 +574,12 @@ object DataSource extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19869
**[Test build #84435 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84435/testReport)**
for PR 19869 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19871#discussion_r154707683
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSource.scala
---
@@ -85,7 +87,8 @@ case class DataSource(
Github user liyinan926 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19717#discussion_r154707798
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/k8s/Config.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19871#discussion_r154707557
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -363,6 +363,14 @@ object SQLConf {
Github user liyinan926 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19717#discussion_r154707001
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/k8s/Config.scala
---
@@ -119,5 +139,60 @@ private[spark] object
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19870#discussion_r154705369
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicLogicalOperators.scala
---
@@ -838,6 +838,8 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19870
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19870
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84428/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19870
**[Test build #84428 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84428/testReport)**
for PR 19870 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19869
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19869
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84432/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19869
**[Test build #84432 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84432/testReport)**
for PR 19869 at commit
Github user liyinan926 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19717#discussion_r154694277
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/k8s/submit/steps/DriverServiceBootstrapStep.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,103
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19861#discussion_r154694199
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/v2/ConfigSupport.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19874
cc @cloud-fan
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19861#discussion_r154692737
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -184,9 +188,16 @@ class DataFrameReader private[sql](sparkSession:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19878#discussion_r154691937
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/hash.scala
---
@@ -389,13 +408,21 @@ abstract class HashExpression[E]
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19880
cc @cloud-fan @wangyum
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19880
**[Test build #84434 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84434/testReport)**
for PR 19880 at commit
GitHub user wzhfy opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19880
[SPARK-22626][SQL][FOLLOWUP] improve documentation and simplify test case
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The reason why some Hive tables have `numRows` statistics is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19861
**[Test build #84433 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84433/testReport)**
for PR 19861 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19877
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19877
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84427/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19877
**[Test build #84427 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84427/testReport)**
for PR 19877 at commit
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19878
left only one very minor comment, it LGTM
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19861#discussion_r154687413
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -184,9 +188,16 @@ class DataFrameReader private[sql](sparkSession:
Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19878#discussion_r154687417
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/hash.scala
---
@@ -389,13 +408,21 @@ abstract class HashExpression[E]
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19878#discussion_r154683889
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/hash.scala
---
@@ -730,23 +776,29 @@ case class HiveHash(children:
Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19878#discussion_r154683716
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/hash.scala
---
@@ -270,17 +270,36 @@ abstract class HashExpression[E]
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19869
**[Test build #84432 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84432/testReport)**
for PR 19869 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19878#discussion_r154682872
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/hash.scala
---
@@ -270,17 +270,36 @@ abstract class HashExpression[E]
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19869#discussion_r154682180
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/HashAggregateExec.scala
---
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ case class HashAggregateExec(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19878
**[Test build #84431 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84431/testReport)**
for PR 19878 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19879
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19865
hopefully https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19878 can fix the problem.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
GitHub user mpetruska opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19879
[SPARK-20706][SPARK-SHELL] Spark-shell not overriding method/variable
definition
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19878
cc @kiszk @mgaido91 @viirya @gatorsmile
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19878
[SPARK-22682][SQL] HashExpression does not need to create global variables
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It turns out that `HashExpression` can pass around some
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19875
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19875
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84425/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19875
**[Test build #84425 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84425/testReport)**
for PR 19875 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19873
**[Test build #84430 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84430/testReport)**
for PR 19873 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19792
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84429/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19792
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19792
**[Test build #84429 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84429/testReport)**
for PR 19792 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19789
I think we should wait for @zsxwing's feedback.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19792
**[Test build #84429 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84429/testReport)**
for PR 19792 at commit
Github user gberger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19792
Fixed
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19870
**[Test build #84428 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84428/testReport)**
for PR 19870 at commit
Github user ptkool commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18424
@a10y Yes, I'm still tracking this.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19875
yes @HyukjinKwon , you are 100% right, sorry for this error.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19872#discussion_r154644084
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/udf.py ---
@@ -56,6 +56,10 @@ def _create_udf(f, returnType, evalType):
return udf_obj._wrapped()
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19872#discussion_r154642230
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/python/AggregateInPandasExec.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19872#discussion_r154642902
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/pythonLogicalOperators.scala
---
@@ -38,3 +38,13 @@ case class
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19872#discussion_r154644620
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -4016,6 +4016,89 @@ def test_unsupported_types(self):
with
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19872#discussion_r154644235
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/RelationalGroupedDataset.scala ---
@@ -437,6 +437,37 @@ class RelationalGroupedDataset
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19872#discussion_r154644340
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/RelationalGroupedDataset.scala ---
@@ -437,6 +437,37 @@ class RelationalGroupedDataset
Github user wbowditch commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/895
Can these configuration additions be added to Spark Documentation
(https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/configuration.html) ?
---
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19871#discussion_r154640805
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSource.scala
---
@@ -568,8 +574,12 @@ object DataSource extends
301 - 400 of 490 matches
Mail list logo
