Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20697
Kubernetes integration test starting
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/testing-k8s-prb-spark-integration/3575/
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20697
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20697
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3708/
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21426
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20697
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91310/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20697
**[Test build #91310 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91310/testReport)**
for PR 20697 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20697
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21426#discussion_r191855502
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/PythonRunner.scala ---
@@ -153,4 +154,30 @@ object PythonRunner {
.map { p => formatPath(p,
Github user ssuchter commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20697
Any more issues that should be addressed now? Is this ready for merge?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20697
**[Test build #91310 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91310/testReport)**
for PR 20697 at commit
Github user ssuchter commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20697#discussion_r191855713
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/integration-tests/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/k8s/integrationtest/backend/IntegrationTestBackend.scala
---
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21459
What's driving this (is it java 9)? I'm in general scared by core library
updates like this. Maybe Spark 3.0 is a good time (and we should just do it
this year).
---
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21450#discussion_r191851612
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/SparkSubmitCommandBuilder.java
---
@@ -229,7 +238,7 @@
args.add(join(",", pyFiles));
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21450#discussion_r191851844
--- Diff:
launcher/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/SparkSubmitCommandBuilderSuite.java
---
@@ -344,8 +365,15 @@ private SparkSubmitCommandBuilder
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21331
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3707/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21331
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user PenguinToast commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21454#discussion_r191849201
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkConfSuite.scala ---
@@ -339,6 +341,38 @@ class SparkConfSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21331
**[Test build #91309 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91309/testReport)**
for PR 21331 at commit
Github user dbtsai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21459
@srowen From the release note, http://asm.ow2.io/versions.html , the
differences between 5.2 to 6.0 are
> Codebase migrated to gitlab (feature requests 317617, 317619, 317542)
Support
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21458
Thank you for working on this, @dbtsai ! :D
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21459#discussion_r191846953
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -313,13 +313,13 @@
chill-java
${chill.version}
-
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21331
LGTM
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21331
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user e-dorigatti closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21463
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user e-dorigatti commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21463
@HyukjinKwon go ahead, no problem
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20795
ping @kevinyu98 @dilipbiswal
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19691
**[Test build #91308 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91308/testReport)**
for PR 19691 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21378#discussion_r191842162
--- Diff: docs/running-on-mesos.md ---
@@ -753,6 +753,16 @@ See the [configuration page](configuration.html) for
information on Spark config
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21463
@e-dorigatti, I think this should really be cleaned up in the master
branch. Mind if I ask to give a try with fixing it in worker side and revert
0ebb0c0d4dd3e192464dc5e0e6f01efa55b945ed in the
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21463
Merged to branch-2.3.
@e-dorigatti, in case of other branches, it should be manually closed by
you.
---
-
To
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
One point that I'm reminded of looking at this is the lack of tests for
important functionality is probably not an acceptable solution. I understand
testing this in Jenkins could be complicated but
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21068
well the downside to that and not just failing the application is similar
to what @squito was mentioning, if the cluster is just busy and you can't get
containers on those last few nodes, it
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21443
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user daniel-shields commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21449
@mgaido91 I looked at the test failures and I think the changes to the
Dataset,resolve method are causing havoc. Consider the Dataset.drop method with
the following signature:
` def
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21443
good catch! LGTM, merging to master!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21247#discussion_r191831524
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonSuite.scala
---
@@ -2313,25 +2314,6 @@ class JsonSuite extends
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21439
cc @gengliangwang
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20894#discussion_r191827211
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVDataSource.scala
---
@@ -110,14 +114,81 @@ abstract class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20894#discussion_r191820709
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVOptions.scala
---
@@ -156,6 +156,12 @@ class CSVOptions(
val
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20894#discussion_r191824714
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVDataSource.scala
---
@@ -110,14 +114,81 @@ abstract class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20894#discussion_r191819710
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVFileFormat.scala
---
@@ -130,14 +130,16 @@ class CSVFileFormat
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20894#discussion_r191819577
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVDataSource.scala
---
@@ -206,12 +290,17 @@ object
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20894#discussion_r191826405
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -499,6 +503,11 @@ class DataFrameReader private[sql](sparkSession:
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20894#discussion_r191026857
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVDataSource.scala
---
@@ -110,14 +114,81 @@ abstract class
Github user arunmahadevan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21428#discussion_r191823576
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/continuous/shuffle/RPCContinuousShuffleWriter.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
Github user DazhuangSu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19691#discussion_r191823358
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -293,6 +313,15 @@ class AstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21463
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21463
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91306/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21463
**[Test build #91306 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91306/testReport)**
for PR 21463 at commit
Github user MaxGekk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21439
Thank you @maropu for your review of the PR.
> better to add tests in json-functions.sql?
What kind of tests would you expect in `json-functions.sql`. Probably you
would expect
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21068
**[Test build #91307 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91307/testReport)**
for PR 21068 at commit
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21403
I am encountering big issues in enforcing the behavior we mentioned. The
problem is that we cannot really distinguish the cases:
- `... (a, b) in (select ...)`
- `... from (select (a, b)
Github user bersprockets commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21231
ping @hvanhovell
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91302/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
**[Test build #91302 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91302/testReport)**
for PR 13599 at commit
Github user MaxGekk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20894
@gatorsmile @cloud-fan @HyukjinKwon @gengliangwang Could you look at the PR
one more time.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user DazhuangSu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19691#discussion_r191805297
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -515,28 +515,66 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21461
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91301/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21461
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21461
**[Test build #91301 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91301/testReport)**
for PR 21461 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21463
**[Test build #91306 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91306/testReport)**
for PR 21463 at commit
Github user icexelloss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21082#discussion_r191801865
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/python/WindowInPandasExec.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,173 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user e-dorigatti closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21461
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21463
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user e-dorigatti opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21463
[SPARK-23754][BRANCH-2.3][PYTHON] Re-raising StopIteration in client code
## What changes are proposed
Make sure that `StopIteration`s raised in users' code do not silently
interrupt
Github user DazhuangSu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19691#discussion_r191795550
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -515,28 +515,66 @@ case class
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21346
yeah I see what you're saying about better error handling, but I'd really
rather not take that on here. I think some prior attempts at solving the 2gb
limit have tried to take on too much, and I'd
Github user attilapiros commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21068
@tgravescs what about removing YARN_BLACKLIST_MAX_NODE_BLACKLIST_RATIO
config and when the set of backlisted nodes reaches numClusterNodes I stop
synchronising the backlisted nodes toward YARN
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21450
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91299/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21450
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21450
**[Test build #91299 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91299/testReport)**
for PR 21450 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21383
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21383
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91300/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21383
**[Test build #91300 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91300/testReport)**
for PR 21383 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21462
Kubernetes integration test status success
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/testing-k8s-prb-spark-integration/3573/
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21462
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91305/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21462
Kubernetes integration test starting
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/testing-k8s-prb-spark-integration/3573/
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21462
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21462
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21462
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3706/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21462
**[Test build #91305 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91305/testReport)**
for PR 21462 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21462
**[Test build #91305 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91305/testReport)**
for PR 21462 at commit
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21462#discussion_r191775677
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/docker/src/main/dockerfiles/spark/entrypoint.sh ---
@@ -46,12 +46,6 @@ shift 1
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21449
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21449
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91303/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21449
**[Test build #91303 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91303/testReport)**
for PR 21449 at commit
GitHub user skonto opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21462
[SPARK-24428][K8S] Fix unused code
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove code that is misleading and is a leftover from previous
implementation.
## How was
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21448
`abs` does seem to belong with math functions.
`isnan` and `nanvl` are sort of math related but to me feel more like
`isnull`. It's more about testing representations of a value, not math
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21459#discussion_r191768841
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -313,13 +313,13 @@
chill-java
${chill.version}
-
Github user attilapiros commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21068#discussion_r191762829
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/config.scala
---
@@ -328,4 +328,19 @@ package object config {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21370
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91297/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21370
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21370
**[Test build #91297 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91297/testReport)**
for PR 21370 at commit
Github user xuanyuanking commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21428#discussion_r191747894
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/continuous/shuffle/RPCContinuousShuffleReader.scala
---
@@ -48,7 +46,7 @@
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21261
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user dbtsai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21459
cc @srowen and @rxin for more eyes.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user dbtsai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21459
@HyukjinKwon Once Spark can be built against JDK9+, we'll need to figure
out how we want to set it up in Jenkins. We can do two builds, and one for JDK8
and another one for JDK9+ for each PR, but
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21458
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user dbtsai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21458
Merged into master. Thanks.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
201 - 300 of 438 matches
Mail list logo
