Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13704
**[Test build #61677 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61677/consoleFull)**
for PR 13704 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008#discussion_r69385942
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -652,6 +656,163 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13976
**[Test build #61676 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61676/consoleFull)**
for PR 13976 at commit
Github user janplus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008#discussion_r69385849
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/StringExpressionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -725,4 +725,51 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
**[Test build #61675 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61675/consoleFull)**
for PR 14033 at commit
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
[SPARK-16286][SQL] Implement stack table generating function
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR implements `stack` table generating function.
## How
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13976
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13976
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61670/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13976
**[Test build #61670 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61670/consoleFull)**
for PR 13976 at commit
Github user mallman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14031#discussion_r69385673
--- Diff: project/SparkBuild.scala ---
@@ -723,8 +723,8 @@ object Unidoc {
.map(_.filterNot(_.getCanonicalPath.contains("org/apache/hadoop")))
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13976
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61669/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13976
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13976
**[Test build #61669 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61669/consoleFull)**
for PR 13976 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008#discussion_r69385614
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/StringExpressionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -725,4 +725,51 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14032
**[Test build #61674 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61674/consoleFull)**
for PR 14032 at commit
GitHub user techaddict opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14032
[Minor][SQL] Replace Parquet deprecations
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Replace `Binary.fromByteArray` with `Binary.fromReusedByteArray`
2. Replace
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
**[Test build #61673 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61673/consoleFull)**
for PR 13680 at commit
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14030
@zsxwing could you take a look at this? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user RicoGit commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12203
Hi guys, it is possible to apply this patch to version 1.6? What can I do
for this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14030
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14030
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61668/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14030
**[Test build #61668 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61668/consoleFull)**
for PR 14030 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13517
**[Test build #61672 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61672/consoleFull)**
for PR 13517 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
**[Test build #61671 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61671/consoleFull)**
for PR 13680 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61671/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
**[Test build #61671 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61671/consoleFull)**
for PR 13680 at commit
Github user janplus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008#discussion_r69385193
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/StringExpressionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -725,4 +725,51 @@ class
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13517#discussion_r69385174
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -45,11 +45,11 @@ statement
| ALTER DATABASE
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008#discussion_r69384995
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/StringExpressionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -725,4 +725,51 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13976
**[Test build #61670 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61670/consoleFull)**
for PR 13976 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13976
Actually, that is not a bug, but I found that there exists a little
difference between Spark and Hive with the following query.
```
SELECT inline(array(struct(a), struct(b))) FROM
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13976
**[Test build #61669 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61669/consoleFull)**
for PR 13976 at commit
Github user janplus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008#discussion_r69384848
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/StringExpressionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -725,4 +725,51 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14030
**[Test build #61668 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61668/consoleFull)**
for PR 14030 at commit
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14030
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13976
Oh, I found a bug and am working on this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680#discussion_r69384068
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/UnsafeArrayData.java
---
@@ -341,63 +324,113 @@ public UnsafeArrayData copy()
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14026#discussion_r69383724
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka010/ConsumerStrategy.scala
---
@@ -79,8 +81,71 @@ private case class
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008
Hi, @janplus .
Overall this PR looks solid to me now. It implemented most logic in the
same way with Hive parse_url.
The remaining difference from Hive is about `SymanticException`
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008#discussion_r69383569
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/StringExpressionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -725,4 +725,51 @@ class
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008#discussion_r69383544
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/StringExpressionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -725,4 +725,51 @@ class
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008#discussion_r69383504
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/StringExpressionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -725,4 +725,51 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13532
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61667/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13532
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13532
**[Test build #61667 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61667/consoleFull)**
for PR 13532 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14030
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61665/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14030
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14030
**[Test build #61665 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61665/consoleFull)**
for PR 14030 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61664/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004
**[Test build #61664 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61664/consoleFull)**
for PR 14004 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14030
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61666/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14030
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14030
**[Test build #61666 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61666/consoleFull)**
for PR 14030 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13967
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13967
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61661/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13765
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13765
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61663/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13967
**[Test build #61661 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61661/consoleFull)**
for PR 13967 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13765
**[Test build #61663 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61663/consoleFull)**
for PR 13765 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13876
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13876
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61662/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13876
**[Test build #61662 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61662/consoleFull)**
for PR 13876 at commit
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14020#discussion_r69382827
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/IsolatedClientLoader.scala
---
@@ -264,7 +270,7 @@ private[hive] class
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14026#discussion_r69382788
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka010/ConsumerStrategy.scala
---
@@ -79,8 +81,71 @@ private case class
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14031#discussion_r69382719
--- Diff: project/SparkBuild.scala ---
@@ -723,8 +723,8 @@ object Unidoc {
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14030#discussion_r69382676
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/ForeachSinkSuite.scala
---
@@ -35,35 +35,109 @@ class ForeachSinkSuite
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14030#discussion_r69382669
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/ForeachSinkSuite.scala
---
@@ -35,35 +35,109 @@ class ForeachSinkSuite
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14030#discussion_r69382667
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/ForeachSinkSuite.scala
---
@@ -35,35 +35,109 @@ class ForeachSinkSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61660/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
**[Test build #61660 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61660/consoleFull)**
for PR 13680 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13532
**[Test build #61667 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61667/consoleFull)**
for PR 13532 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14030
**[Test build #61666 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61666/consoleFull)**
for PR 14030 at commit
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14030
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14030
**[Test build #61665 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61665/consoleFull)**
for PR 14030 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14031
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user mallman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14031#discussion_r69382212
--- Diff: project/SparkBuild.scala ---
@@ -723,8 +723,8 @@ object Unidoc {
.map(_.filterNot(_.getCanonicalPath.contains("org/apache/hadoop")))
GitHub user mallman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14031
[SPARK-16353][BUILD][DOC] Missing javadoc options for java unidoc
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The javadoc options for the java unidoc generation are ignored when
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004
**[Test build #61664 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61664/consoleFull)**
for PR 14004 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004
Just rebased.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13876
**[Test build #61662 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61662/consoleFull)**
for PR 13876 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13967
**[Test build #61661 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61661/consoleFull)**
for PR 13967 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13765
**[Test build #61663 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61663/consoleFull)**
for PR 13765 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13967
Rebased to the master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13876
Rebased to the master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13765
Rebased to the master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14017
Thank you for merging, @srowen .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680#discussion_r69381782
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/UnsafeArrayData.java
---
@@ -341,63 +324,113 @@ public UnsafeArrayData copy()
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
**[Test build #61660 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61660/consoleFull)**
for PR 13680 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680#discussion_r69381568
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/benchmark/UnsafeArrayDataBenchmark.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,298 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14030
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14030
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61659/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14030
**[Test build #61659 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61659/consoleFull)**
for PR 14030 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13517#discussion_r69380919
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -45,11 +45,11 @@ statement
| ALTER DATABASE
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14029
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61658/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14029
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14029
**[Test build #61658 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61658/consoleFull)**
for PR 14029 at commit
GitHub user lw-lin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14030
[WIP][SPARK-16350][SQL] Fix `foreach` for streaming Dataset
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- [x] add tests
- [ ] fix `foreach`
## How was this patch
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
