Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14239
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64275/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14239
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14239
**[Test build #64275 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64275/consoleFull)**
for PR 14239 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14754
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64268/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14754
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14757#discussion_r75806381
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/test/TestHive.scala ---
@@ -139,12 +139,9 @@ private[hive] class TestHiveSparkSession(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14754
**[Test build #64268 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64268/consoleFull)**
for PR 14754 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14239
**[Test build #64275 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64275/consoleFull)**
for PR 14239 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14769
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user Sherry302 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14769
[MINOR][SQL] Remove implemented functions from comments of 'HiveSessiâ¦
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR removes implemented functions from comments of
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
**[Test build #64274 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64274/consoleFull)**
for PR 14447 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14768#discussion_r75805277
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/UnsafeExternalSorter.java
---
@@ -522,7 +522,8 @@ public long spill() throws
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64262/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14757
**[Test build #64273 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64273/consoleFull)**
for PR 14757 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753
**[Test build #64262 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64262/consoleFull)**
for PR 14753 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64264/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14757
@cloud-fan Yeah, `getNewClient` equals to `getClient.newSession`. After
rethinking it, maybe we do not need it. : ) Thus, the latest changes remove it
too.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753
**[Test build #64264 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64264/consoleFull)**
for PR 14753 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14757
**[Test build #64272 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64272/consoleFull)**
for PR 14757 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14757#discussion_r75804665
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/test/TestHive.scala ---
@@ -139,12 +139,9 @@ private[hive] class TestHiveSparkSession(
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14757#discussion_r75804066
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/test/TestHive.scala ---
@@ -139,12 +139,9 @@ private[hive] class TestHiveSparkSession(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14765
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64263/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14765
**[Test build #64263 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64263/consoleFull)**
for PR 14765 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14765
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14768
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user dbtsai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796
The solution of this overparameterized problem in the link is just adding
the regularization, and users may not want it. I think we need to optimize it
on (k-1) parameters, and then put the final or
GitHub user Sherry302 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14768
[MINOR][BUILD] Fix Java CheckStyle Error
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As Spark 2.0.1 will be released soon (mentioned in the spark dev mailing
list), besides the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14761
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64270/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14761
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14728
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64260/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14728
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user mpjlu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14597#discussion_r75802771
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/ChiSqSelector.scala ---
@@ -171,14 +180,47 @@ object ChiSqSelectorModel extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14728
**[Test build #64260 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64260/consoleFull)**
for PR 14728 at commit
Github user mpjlu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14597#discussion_r75802754
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/ChiSqSelector.scala ---
@@ -171,14 +180,47 @@ object ChiSqSelectorModel extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14761
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14761
**[Test build #64269 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64269/consoleFull)**
for PR 14761 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14761
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64269/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14763
Hi, @JoshRosen .
The generated SQL seems to be changed. In order to pass
`LogicalPlanToSQLSuite`, you can regenerate the answer set with the following
command.
```
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796
@dbtsai
simply say, when reg==0, the minimizer is not a point but becomes a plane.
so the second derivative on the plane will turn into zero. so ...
and I give a reference here:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14618
**[Test build #64271 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64271/consoleFull)**
for PR 14618 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14761
**[Test build #64270 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64270/consoleFull)**
for PR 14761 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14757#discussion_r75800807
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/test/TestHive.scala ---
@@ -139,12 +139,9 @@ private[hive] class TestHiveSparkSession(
Github user dbtsai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796
@WeichenXu123 Do you run into this potential issue with any dataset? If so,
we may need to consider optimize softmax with pivoting when `reg == 0`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14757#discussion_r75800677
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/ExternalCatalogSuite.scala
---
@@ -40,6 +40,15 @@ abstract class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14767
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64267/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14761
**[Test build #64269 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64269/consoleFull)**
for PR 14761 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14767
**[Test build #64267 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64267/consoleFull)**
for PR 14767 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14767
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796
I found a problem in the merged code: when reg == 0 the minimizer of
softmax cost is not unique.
In such case, it will cause Hessian matrix non-invertible, and I thinks it
may cause
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14625
Sure, will split it to multiple PRs. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14757#discussion_r75799684
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -41,13 +42,20 @@ import
Github user gatorsmile closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14625
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64256/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753
**[Test build #64256 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64256/consoleFull)**
for PR 14753 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14766
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14766
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64265/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14766
**[Test build #64265 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64265/consoleFull)**
for PR 14766 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14754
**[Test build #64268 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64268/consoleFull)**
for PR 14754 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14752
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64253/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14767
**[Test build #64267 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64267/consoleFull)**
for PR 14767 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14752
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user junyangq opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14767
[SparkR][Minor] Remove Reference Link for the Common Windows Environment
Variables.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR removes reference link in the doc for
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14752
**[Test build #64253 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64253/consoleFull)**
for PR 14752 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64255/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user clockfly commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14754
@rxin updated.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753
**[Test build #64255 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64255/consoleFull)**
for PR 14753 at commit
Github user clockfly commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753#discussion_r75798274
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/interfaces.scala
---
@@ -389,3 +389,175 @@ abstract class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880
**[Test build #64266 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64266/consoleFull)**
for PR 8880 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14766
**[Test build #64265 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64265/consoleFull)**
for PR 14766 at commit
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14524
Sorry for late response! I'm against this change since it introduces
indeterministic behavior and makes applications hard to debug. For example, I
want to cross validate some estimator that accepts
Github user clockfly commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753#discussion_r75797813
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/interfaces.scala
---
@@ -389,3 +389,146 @@ abstract class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13988
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14765
**[Test build #64263 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64263/consoleFull)**
for PR 14765 at commit
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14766
[SPARK-17197] [ML] [PySpark] PySpark LiR/LoR supports tree aggregation
level configurable.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13988
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64254/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753
**[Test build #64264 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64264/consoleFull)**
for PR 14753 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13988
**[Test build #64254 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64254/consoleFull)**
for PR 13988 at commit
GitHub user suyanNone opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14765
[SPARK-15815] Kã
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch tested?
(Please explain
Github user clockfly commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753#discussion_r75797539
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/interfaces.scala
---
@@ -389,3 +389,175 @@ abstract class
Github user clockfly commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753#discussion_r75797479
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/interfaces.scala
---
@@ -389,3 +389,175 @@ abstract class
Github user clockfly commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753#discussion_r75797504
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/interfaces.scala
---
@@ -389,3 +389,175 @@ abstract class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753
**[Test build #64262 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64262/consoleFull)**
for PR 14753 at commit
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14761#discussion_r75797308
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/utils.R ---
@@ -697,3 +697,20 @@ is_master_local <- function(master) {
is_sparkR_shell <- function() {
grepl(".*shell\\.R$",
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14763
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64257/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14763
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14761#discussion_r75797228
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/sparkR.R ---
@@ -367,19 +367,21 @@ sparkR.session <- function(
overrideEnvs(sparkConfigMap, paramMap)
}
# do not
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14763
**[Test build #64257 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64257/consoleFull)**
for PR 14763 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14764
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
@param ... Should be in mllib.R
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14764
LGTM. Merged into master and branch-2.0. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880
**[Test build #64261 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64261/consoleFull)**
for PR 8880 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64261/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880
**[Test build #64261 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64261/consoleFull)**
for PR 8880 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14618
Will do it soon. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14745
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64250/
Test PASSed.
---
1 - 100 of 761 matches
Mail list logo
