Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19436
**[Test build #82465 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82465/testReport)**
for PR 19436 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19436
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82465/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19436
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user rekhajoshm closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19418
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440
@srowen @thunterdb any more thoughts on this?
how about @sethah @yanboliang @jkbradley?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82466/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19418
I think we don't want to add such defensive condition and avoid the
logtrace. Without that, we don't know the problem is happened. We should
identify the issue and fix it if it is really there,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732
**[Test build #82466 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82466/testReport)**
for PR 18732 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19436#discussion_r142850005
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/objects.scala ---
@@ -394,7 +394,11 @@ case class FlatMapGroupsInRExec(
override def
Github user rekhajoshm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19418
@viirya You are correct, i am on latest master, and i did not get it yet.
This PR was to have a defensive condition. As, if this happens only under
certain unique data/flow, this is the one
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19436#discussion_r142849580
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/objects.scala ---
@@ -394,7 +394,11 @@ case class FlatMapGroupsInRExec(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19435
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82462/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19435
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19435
**[Test build #82462 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82462/testReport)**
for PR 19435 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19418
From the stacktrace posted in the JIRA, the problematic code is:
/* 151 */ comp = agg_bufValue.compare(smj_value3);
`agg_bufValue` is a `long` but `smj_value3` is a
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19436
@HyukjinKwon Yeah, wait me few minutes. Thanks.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82463/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732
**[Test build #82463 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82463/testReport)**
for PR 18732 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19436
LGTM mind opening a JIRA?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user rekhajoshm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19418#discussion_r142848020
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -697,7 +697,12 @@ class
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19418#discussion_r142847702
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -697,7 +697,12 @@ class CodegenContext {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19418
**[Test build #82471 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82471/testReport)**
for PR 19418 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19424
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82464/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19424
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19424
**[Test build #82464 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82464/testReport)**
for PR 19424 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19436
**[Test build #82470 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82470/testReport)**
for PR 19436 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19436
Ok. The added test works to verify this is an issue. See the test result of
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82468/testReport.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732
**[Test build #82469 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82469/testReport)**
for PR 18732 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19436
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user icexelloss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732#discussion_r142845456
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/group.py ---
@@ -192,7 +193,67 @@ def pivot(self, pivot_col, values=None):
jgd = self._jgd.pivot(pivot_col)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19436
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82468/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19436
**[Test build #82468 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82468/testReport)**
for PR 19436 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19418#discussion_r142844714
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -697,7 +697,14 @@ class CodegenContext {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19418
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19418
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82467/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19418
**[Test build #82467 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82467/testReport)**
for PR 19418 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19432
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19432
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19436
**[Test build #82468 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82468/testReport)**
for PR 19436 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19418#discussion_r142841674
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -697,7 +697,14 @@ class CodegenContext {
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732#discussion_r142841543
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/group.py ---
@@ -192,7 +193,67 @@ def pivot(self, pivot_col, values=None):
jgd = self._jgd.pivot(pivot_col)
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19418
**[Test build #82467 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82467/testReport)**
for PR 19418 at commit
Github user icexelloss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732#discussion_r142840490
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/object.scala
---
@@ -519,3 +519,18 @@ case class CoGroup(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732
**[Test build #82466 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82466/testReport)**
for PR 18732 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19436
**[Test build #82465 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82465/testReport)**
for PR 19436 at commit
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19436
[SQL][WIP] Fix FlatMapGroupsInR's child distribution when grouping
attributes are empty
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Looks like
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19424
**[Test build #82464 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82464/testReport)**
for PR 19424 at commit
Github user icexelloss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732#discussion_r142839010
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/python/ArrowEvalPythonExec.scala
---
@@ -26,6 +26,25 @@ import
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19424#discussion_r142838899
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/v2/PushDownOperatorsToDataSource.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732
**[Test build #82463 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82463/testReport)**
for PR 18732 at commit
Github user icexelloss commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732
I pushed a new commit addressing the comments. Let me scan through the
comments again. I think there are some comments around worker.py not being
addressed yet.
---
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732#discussion_r142836611
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/python/ArrowEvalPythonExec.scala
---
@@ -26,6 +26,25 @@ import
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19416
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19435#discussion_r142836474
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/state/SymmetricHashJoinStateManager.scala
---
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19435
**[Test build #82462 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82462/testReport)**
for PR 19435 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732#discussion_r142836297
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/object.scala
---
@@ -519,3 +519,18 @@ case class CoGroup(
GitHub user lw-lin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19435
[WIP][SS][MINOR] "keyWithIndexToNumValues" -> "keyWithIndexToValue"
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR changes `keyWithIndexToNumValues` to `keyWithIndexToValue`.
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732#discussion_r142836245
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/object.scala
---
@@ -519,3 +519,18 @@ case class CoGroup(
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732#discussion_r142835260
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/group.py ---
@@ -192,7 +193,66 @@ def pivot(self, pivot_col, values=None):
jgd = self._jgd.pivot(pivot_col)
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18924#discussion_r142833499
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAOptimizer.scala ---
@@ -462,36 +462,55 @@ final class OnlineLDAOptimizer extends
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18924#discussion_r142833374
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAOptimizer.scala ---
@@ -462,36 +462,55 @@ final class OnlineLDAOptimizer extends
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18924
Yes, I think local test is enough for both correctness and performance.
For consistency with old LDA, just some manual local test would be
sufficient. You may well just use the LDA example
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18924#discussion_r142831316
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAOptimizer.scala ---
@@ -462,36 +462,55 @@ final class OnlineLDAOptimizer extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19432
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19432
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82460/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19432
**[Test build #82460 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82460/testReport)**
for PR 19432 at commit
Github user akopich commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18924
@jkbradley, thank you!
- Correctness: in order to test the equivalence of two versions of
`submitMiniBatch` I have to bring both of them into the scope... One solution
would be to derive a
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18924#discussion_r142826379
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAOptimizer.scala ---
@@ -462,36 +462,55 @@ final class OnlineLDAOptimizer extends
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18924#discussion_r142826326
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAOptimizer.scala ---
@@ -462,31 +462,54 @@ final class OnlineLDAOptimizer extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19424
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19424
**[Test build #82461 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82461/testReport)**
for PR 19424 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19424
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82461/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19434
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user CrazyJacky opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19434
[SPARK-21785][SQL]Support create table from a parquet file schema
## Support create table from a parquet file schema
As described in jira:
```sql
CREATE EXTERNAL TABLE IF NOT EXISTS
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19412
I think the argument for it if anything is that it's a) deprecated, so
should kinda be optional to build, and b) this would simply be consistent with
how other external/* modules are handled. For
Github user ArtRand commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19272
@kalvinnchau I'm running Hadoop 2.6 on a DC/OS cluster with Mesos 1.4.0
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19424
**[Test build #82461 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82461/testReport)**
for PR 19424 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19392
hmm, it's not a bug fix but a nice-to-have feature, do we want this in
spark 2.2?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user smurching commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19433
@WeichenXu123 would you be able to take an initial look at this?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user ajbozarth commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19270#discussion_r142782246
--- Diff: core/src/main/resources/org/apache/spark/ui/static/taskspages.js
---
@@ -0,0 +1,474 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user ajbozarth commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19270#discussion_r142781908
--- Diff: core/src/main/resources/org/apache/spark/ui/static/utils.js ---
@@ -46,3 +46,64 @@ function formatBytes(bytes, type) {
var i =
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19433
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user smurching opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19433
[SPARK-3162] [MLlib][WIP] Add local tree training for decision tree
regressors
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
WIP, DO NOT MERGE
### Overview
This PR
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19432
**[Test build #82460 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82460/testReport)**
for PR 19432 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19424#discussion_r142800670
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/v2/PushDownOperatorsToDataSource.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+/*
+
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19424#discussion_r142801593
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/v2/DataSourceV2ScanExec.scala
---
@@ -32,13 +32,12 @@ import
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19424#discussion_r142806719
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/v2/PushDownOperatorsToDataSource.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+/*
+
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19432
cc @gatorsmile
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19432
[SPARK-22203][SQL]Add job description for file listing Spark jobs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The user may be confused about some 1-tasks jobs. We can add a job
Github user susanxhuynh closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19428
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user icexelloss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732#discussion_r142801623
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/python/ArrowEvalPythonExec.scala
---
@@ -26,6 +26,25 @@ import
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19108
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19108
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82459/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19108
**[Test build #82459 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82459/testReport)**
for PR 19108 at commit
Github user icexelloss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732#discussion_r142796899
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/object.scala
---
@@ -519,3 +519,18 @@ case class CoGroup(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18966
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18966
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82455/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18966
**[Test build #82455 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82455/testReport)**
for PR 18966 at commit
1 - 100 of 270 matches
Mail list logo
