Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23040
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23040
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98989/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23040
**[Test build #98989 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98989/testReport)**
for PR 23040 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23025
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23025
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23025
**[Test build #98992 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98992/testReport)**
for PR 23025 at commit
Github user JulienPeloton commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23025#discussion_r234512932
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -732,6 +732,11 @@ def repartitionByRange(self, numPartitions, *cols):
At least one
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23025#discussion_r234511357
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -732,6 +732,11 @@ def repartitionByRange(self, numPartitions, *cols):
At least one partition-by
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23025
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23025
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user JulienPeloton commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23025#discussion_r234509708
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -2789,6 +2789,12 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
* When no
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23025
**[Test build #98991 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98991/testReport)**
for PR 23025 at commit
Github user rednaxelafx commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23079#discussion_r234508866
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/ReplaceNullWithFalseInPredicateSuite.scala
---
@@ -298,6 +299,45 @@
Github user rednaxelafx commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23079#discussion_r234508561
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/expressions.scala
---
@@ -767,6 +767,15 @@ object ReplaceNullWithFalse
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23082
**[Test build #98990 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98990/testReport)**
for PR 23082 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23082
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23082
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23082
cc @cloud-fan @gatorsmile @dongjoon-hyun
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user ueshin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23082
[SPARK-26112][SQL] Update since versions of new built-in functions.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The following 5 functions were removed from branch-2.4:
-
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23045
LGTM.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23045#discussion_r234502854
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/collectionOperations.scala
---
@@ -521,13 +521,18 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23054
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23054
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98988/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23054
**[Test build #98988 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98988/testReport)**
for PR 23054 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23043
Do we need to consider `GenerateSafeProjection`, too? In other words, if
the generated code or runtime does not use data in `Unsafe`, this `+0.0/-0.0`
problem may still exist.
Am I correct?
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23025
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98987/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23025
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23025
**[Test build #98987 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98987/testReport)**
for PR 23025 at commit
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23076
I'm seeing both sides of needs: while I think dumping full plan into file
is a good feature for debugging specific issue, retaining full plans for
representing them to UI page have been a
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23045#discussion_r234494542
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/collectionOperations.scala
---
@@ -521,13 +521,18 @@ case class
Github user LinhongLiu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23040
cc @cloud-fan @srowen
review is fixed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23040
**[Test build #98989 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98989/testReport)**
for PR 23040 at commit
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23058
@attilapiros can you review this please?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user wangyum commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23027#discussion_r234482766
--- Diff: sql/core/benchmarks/FilterPushdownBenchmark-results.txt ---
@@ -2,669 +2,809 @@
Pushdown for many distinct value case
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23045#discussion_r234481249
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/collectionOperations.scala
---
@@ -521,13 +521,18 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23081
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98984/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23081
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23081
**[Test build #98984 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98984/testReport)**
for PR 23081 at commit
Github user xuanyuanking commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21363
@MaxGekk Sorry for the late, something inserted in the my scheduler, I plan
to start this PR in this weekend, if its too late please just take it, sorry
for the late again.
---
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23043
Is it better to update this PR title now?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23054#discussion_r234477289
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/KeyValueGroupedDataset.scala ---
@@ -459,7 +460,11 @@ class KeyValueGroupedDataset[K, V]
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23043
@srowen #21794 is what I thought.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23080
Ah, also, `CsvParser.beginParsing` takes an additional argument `Charset`.
It should rather be easily able to support encoding in `multiLine`. @MaxGekk,
would you be able to find some time to
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23054#discussion_r234476607
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/KeyValueGroupedDataset.scala ---
@@ -459,7 +460,11 @@ class KeyValueGroupedDataset[K, V]
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23080#discussion_r234476318
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/csv/CSVOptions.scala
---
@@ -192,6 +192,20 @@ class CSVOptions(
*/
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23043#discussion_r234476361
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameAggregateSuite.scala ---
@@ -723,4 +723,32 @@ class DataFrameAggregateSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23054
**[Test build #98988 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98988/testReport)**
for PR 23054 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23054
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23054
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21888
**[Test build #98986 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98986/testReport)**
for PR 21888 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21888
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98986/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21888
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23043#discussion_r234475978
--- Diff:
common/unsafe/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/PlatformUtilSuite.java ---
@@ -157,4 +159,15 @@ public void heapMemoryReuse() {
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23043#discussion_r234476055
--- Diff:
common/unsafe/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/PlatformUtilSuite.java ---
@@ -157,4 +159,15 @@ public void heapMemoryReuse() {
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23043#discussion_r234475858
--- Diff: common/unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/Platform.java
---
@@ -120,6 +120,9 @@ public static float getFloat(Object object, long
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23025
**[Test build #98987 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98987/testReport)**
for PR 23025 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23025
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23025
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23080#discussion_r234475595
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/csv/CSVOptions.scala
---
@@ -192,6 +192,20 @@ class CSVOptions(
*/
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23025#discussion_r234475550
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -2789,6 +2789,12 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
* When no explicit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23054#discussion_r234475488
--- Diff: docs/sql-migration-guide-upgrade.md ---
@@ -17,6 +17,9 @@ displayTitle: Spark SQL Upgrading Guide
- The `ADD JAR` command previously
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23025
ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23054#discussion_r234475321
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -1594,6 +1594,15 @@ object SQLConf {
"WHERE, which
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23080#discussion_r234475228
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/csv/CSVOptions.scala
---
@@ -192,6 +192,20 @@ class CSVOptions(
*/
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23054#discussion_r234475156
--- Diff: docs/sql-migration-guide-upgrade.md ---
@@ -17,6 +17,9 @@ displayTitle: Spark SQL Upgrading Guide
- The `ADD JAR` command
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21888
**[Test build #98986 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98986/testReport)**
for PR 21888 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23079#discussion_r234474562
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/expressions.scala
---
@@ -767,6 +767,15 @@ object ReplaceNullWithFalse
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23077
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23077
Merged to master.
Thanks for reviewing this, @BryanCutler and @srowen.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23077
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98985/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23077
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23077
**[Test build #98985 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98985/testReport)**
for PR 23077 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23054
For non-primitive types there is a struct named "key".
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23077
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23077
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23077
**[Test build #98985 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98985/testReport)**
for PR 23077 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23077
Oh, I think the PR title should be SPARK-26105 too
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23081
**[Test build #98984 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98984/testReport)**
for PR 23081 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23081
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23081
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23077
>BTW, Bryan, do you have some time to work on the has_numpy stuff
Yup, I can do that
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23077
Oops, actually I think there is one more here
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/python/pyspark/testing/mllibutils.py#L20
Other than that, looks good
---
GitHub user shahidki31 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23081
[SPARK-26109][WebUI]Duration in the task summary metrics table and the task
table are different
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Task summary displays the summary of the
Github user aokolnychyi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23079#discussion_r234467085
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/ReplaceNullWithFalseInPredicateSuite.scala
---
@@ -298,6 +299,45 @@
Github user aokolnychyi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23079
@rednaxelafx I am glad the rule gets more adoption. Renaming also makes
sense to me.
Shall we extend `ReplaceNullWithFalseEndToEndSuite` as well?
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23065
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98983/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23065
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23065
**[Test build #98983 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98983/testReport)**
for PR 23065 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23054
BTW what does the non-primitive types look like? Do they get flattened, or
is there a strict?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23054
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98981/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23054
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23054
**[Test build #98981 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98981/testReport)**
for PR 23054 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23080
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98982/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23080
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23080
**[Test build #98982 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98982/testReport)**
for PR 23080 at commit
Github user MaxGekk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23075
ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user ssimeonov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23075
@MaxGekk done
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user chenqin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23073#discussion_r234453776
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/ExecutorData.scala ---
@@ -27,12 +27,14 @@ import org.apache.spark.rpc.{RpcAddress,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23065
**[Test build #98983 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98983/testReport)**
for PR 23065 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23065
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
1 - 100 of 189 matches
Mail list logo
