hi,
i observe some weirdness in rsync file transfer i cannot explain.
i'm transferring data from 2 freenas storages to a linux vm with zfsonlinux.
"fnask" is older freenas with rsync 3.1.1 running in daemon mode,
freenas-bnkw is more recent with rsync 3.1.2, also daemon-mode.
on the linux vm
hello,
i observe a weird performance problem while trying to rsync .vhd image
files from xenserver to linux backupserver.
i have broken the problem down to a single 500gb file which gets
pathological slow on subsequent runs.
rsync begins with decent speed (250MB/s), i can see that with
have a look at this one:
http://osxdaily.com/2016/04/17/speed-up-time-machine-by-removing-low-process-priority-throttling/
i also recommend taking a look at borgbackup and
https://github.com/borgbase/vorta
roland
Am 21.04.19 um 05:32 schrieb Peng Yu via rsync:
Hi,
I experience a slow backup
hello,
does somebody know how to circumvent that "extra file access restriction
feature" introduced in osx some time ago ?
i already tried adding rsync binary to programms with "full disk access"
privilege ( system-prefs -> security & privacy -> privacy -> full disk
access) , since running as
that or something different ?
roland
Am 28.03.20 um 16:20 schrieb Ben Bass:
Hi Roland.
You might have to give ssh full disk access on the remote Mac, as that
is what is accessing the files according to the Mac.
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 9:12 AM Roland via rsync
mailto:rsync@lists.samba.org>>
>with rsync hanging - after breakout on /home for writing I then get:
>"Read-only file system"
if your filesystem switches to read-only, you have a serious problem
with your system/storage, not with rsync.
rsync (or the workload) is simply triggering the problem.
regards
roland
Am 10.09.20
would it perhaps make sense to have a "--disable-sse2/3" commandline
switch in rsync, too - at least for some timeframe until this is
considered "rock solid" ?
i dislike having automatic cpu feature switching code in a tool which
needs to be reliable for me, this new optimization may have issues
Hello,
i have a backup script where i first used "--exclude-from" only. users
of my script can set exclude statements in backup client specific
property files.
later on, i needed to extend the script because of special requirement ,
so i needed to introduce usage of "--filter='merge
hello,
it's fantastic to see that such optimizations still being found.
out of curiosity - what is the status of this? will it get merged ?
roland
Am 28.09.21 um 12:05 schrieb Jindřich Makovička via rsync:
In 2004, an allocation optimization has been added to the file
list handling code,
hello,
I have opened https://github.com/WayneD/rsync/issues/282
looks similar to https://github.com/WayneD/rsync/issues/164 and
https://github.com/WayneD/rsync/issues/8
roland
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options:
hello,
i do some backup via rsync/ssh and pull data from remote machine to
local machine.
whenever on remote machine there is some network attached subdir getting
"stuck" (i.e. read/write is blocking, eg. by suspended zfs pool because
of error), rsync backup also hangs forever.
i wonder what's
t for its connection to an rsync daemon to succeed. If
the timeout is reached, rsync exits with an error.
Am 01.09.22 um 17:32 schrieb Kevin Korb via rsync:
You are using rsync over ssh. The connection timeout (and port)
options don't matter if rsync isn't doing the networking.
On 9/1/22 08:
Am 01.09.22 um 17:32 schrieb Kevin Korb via rsync:
You are using rsync over ssh. The connection timeout (and port)
options don't matter if rsync isn't doing the networking.
On 9/1/22 08:49, Roland via rsync wrote:
hello,
i do some backup via rsync/ssh and pull data from remote machine to
loca
why not avoid using "--remove-source-files" and delete files
manually/via extra step afterwards ?
Am 17.10.22 um 08:59 schrieb Sridhar Sarnobat via rsync:
90% of my data losses are caused by rsync'ing from dir A to dir A
(accidental incorrect copy and paste, or where dir B is a symlink to
dir
nice,
do you have performance comparison vs. plain fail on the same hardware
setup ?
thank you
roland
Am 10.02.23 um 07:56 schrieb Heiko Schlittermann via rsync:
fuse driver that maps the huge file (or device) as a directory of files
representing blocks of the backing file (or device).
and then, it stops totally quiet.
you mean it simply exits without any message?
what's the return code ( echo $? )
roland
Am 06.02.24 um 22:18 schrieb Franke via rsync:
Hi Kevin,
Am 06.02.24 um 20:55 schrieb Kevin Korb:
The other likely cause is your $SOURCE being something that contains
here is another report of this behaviour.
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/754923/rsync-just-stops
nothing appropriate in bugzilla, besides
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13317
do you use zfs or is there full-space/quota condition while running?
if you can't resolve, please
hello,
apparently, rsync sorts the list of files provided to "--files-from".
how can i avoid sorting of that list ?
I want to copy a list of files in specific order
regards
Roland
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change
to bugzilla
thanks
roland
Am 31.12.23 um 20:56 schrieb francis.montag...@inria.fr:
Hi.
On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 20:28:21 +0100 Roland via rsync wrote:
apparently, rsync sorts the list of files provided to "--files-from".
how can i avoid sorting of that list ?
According
it's most likely because of vfat timestamp limitation
try
--modify-window
When comparing two timestamps, rsync treats the
timestamps as being equal if they differ by no more than the modify-window
value. This is normally 0 (for an exact match), but
you may find
20 matches
Mail list logo
