Hi folks,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 5:49 AM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello folks,
as expected changes over 3.4.1.rc4 are minimal:
Merged in Sage 3.4.1.final:
#5284: Michael Abshoff: Set sage-flags.txt up to SSE2 only when
building Sage in SSE2 only mode/remove SSSE3 and
There is no need to put in a long description within the patch: just
put in a short one and add detail on the trac ticket. And you can use
whatever editor you like. For me hg pops up emacs, presumably because
I have environment variable set to emacs -nw
John
2009/4/27 Rado rki...@gmail.com:
On Apr 27, 4:48 am, evan foss evanf...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok thanks, I have been wondering about the performance of netbooks.
well, i'm surprised how good it is. you can give me some calculations
and i can benchmark it.
h
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this
This looks pretty nasty:
sage: Fx.b=GF(2^(4*5))
sage: Ex=EllipticCurve(Fx,[0,0,1,1,1])
sage: Ex.defining_polynomial()
x^3 + y^2*z + 0*x*z^2 + 0*y*z^2 + 0*z^3
(note the coefficients of zero).
I found this while reviewing #5765 but the above is in a vanilla
3.4.2.alpha0, and it is wrong; though
Weird. This does not happen on my laptop (32-bit arch linux -- you
didn't think I would put up a patch without doctesting did you? :)
But I am definitely getting this on sage.math. I'll try to see what I
can do about it.
Alex
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 9:20 PM, John Cremona
2009/4/27 Alex Ghitza aghi...@gmail.com:
Weird. This does not happen on my laptop (32-bit arch linux -- you
didn't think I would put up a patch without doctesting did you? :)
Of course not!
But I am definitely getting this on sage.math. I'll try to see what I
can do about it.
thanks.
A bit more info: on sage.math, it is working fine in sage-2.0, but
not in sage-2.10 (or anything later). I realise that quite a bit
happened between 2.0 and 2.10, but that's the only 2.*'s that I can
run (2.5 and 2.6 complain bitterly when started).
Weird.
--
Alex Ghitza -- Lecturer in
2009/4/27 Alex Ghitza aghi...@gmail.com:
A bit more info: on sage.math, it is working fine in sage-2.0, but
not in sage-2.10 (or anything later). I realise that quite a bit
happened between 2.0 and 2.10, but that's the only 2.*'s that I can
run (2.5 and 2.6 complain bitterly when started).
Hi Lucio,
Sorry for not replying to your previous email. I work at a financial company
(Bloomberg) and work has been crazy lately.
If you have some time to build a new iso with the new Sage please do it,
and post your version in the mailing list. We can upload the iso the sagemath.
If you ask
OK, here's a much simpler example, which also indicates that it's a
problem with finite fields (again, aarrgh):
{{{
sage: Fx.b = GF(2^15)
sage: R.x,y = Fx[]
sage: R({(1,2):1})# this works fine
x*y^2
sage: Fx.b = GF(2^16)
sage: R.x,y = Fx[]
sage: R({(1,2):1})# this sucks!!!
0*x*y^2
}}}
Alfredo,
awesome, I'll build it and provide the instructions and send William
an email soon and also post the news here.
Greetings,
Lucio.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Alfredo Portes doyenatc...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Lucio,
Sorry for not replying to your previous email. I work at a
2^16 is the smallest for which givaro is not used. In char.2, we switch to NTL.
Also, it's not a 32/64-bit issue really, since I was running a 32-bit machine.
John
2009/4/27 Alex Ghitza aghi...@gmail.com:
OK, here's a much simpler example, which also indicates that it's a
problem with
On Monday 27 April 2009, John Cremona wrote:
2^16 is the smallest for which givaro is not used. In char.2, we switch to
NTL.
Yes, it is likely in the conversion routine from NTL to Singular.
Also, it's not a 32/64-bit issue really, since I was running a 32-bit
machine.
I can confirm this,
Hi,
Here is a link to an interesting thread on the OpenModelica message
board about Sage
-- Forwarded message --
From: pepe balazovic.pe...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 8:05 AM
Subject: Re: OpenModelica
To: William Stein wst...@gmail.com
Hello William,
I've had a
On Apr 27, 6:45 am, Alex Ghitza aghi...@gmail.com wrote:
A bit more info: on sage.math, it is working fine in sage-2.0, but
not in sage-2.10 (or anything later). I realise that quite a bit
happened between 2.0 and 2.10, but that's the only 2.*'s that I can
run (2.5 and 2.6 complain
mabshoff wrote:
I just noticed that fortran-OSX64-20090120.spkg had disappeared from
the experimental spkg repo. Since I had personally uploaded it and I
had seen other instances where experimental/optional spkg disappeared
I would like to ask various people with spkgs in the repo, i.e. Jaap
On Apr 26, 2009, at 22:15 , jjoonathan wrote:
On Apr 26, 9:49 pm, Justin C. Walker jus...@mac.com wrote:
I think you are violating your NDA with Apple.
I think the only detail I revealed that actually belongs to apple is
the version number of darwin 10 (and possibly a version range of
The note about OpenModelica brought this to mind.
Maxima is licensed under GPL, but it too has additional restrictions.
You can see the original letter releasing the code to Bill Schelter
from the DOE, whose people perhaps did not understand GPL
entirely.
On Apr 27, 1:14 pm, rjf fate...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The note about OpenModelica brought this to mind.
Maxima is licensed under GPL, but it too has additional restrictions.
You can see the original letter releasing the code to Bill Schelter
from the DOE, whose people perhaps did not
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 4:14 PM, rjf fate...@gmail.com wrote:
The note about OpenModelica brought this to mind.
Maxima is licensed under GPL, but it too has additional restrictions.
You can see the original letter releasing the code to Bill Schelter
from the DOE, whose people perhaps did
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009, mabshoff wrote:
which seems to be transcribed from the GIF. Given that Debian pays
close attention to the licenses of code can someone with access to a
pure Debian check what repo Maxima is in? It would also be worthwhile
to ping debian-legal about this should Maxima be
SNIP
Well, IANAL. Looking at COPYING in Maxima's source distribution it
says:
[quote]
Maxima is dedicated to the memory of William F. Schelter. On 6 October
1998 William F. Schelter was formally notified that he could
distribute
DOE-MACSYMA upon terms of his choosing, in particular the
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:02 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
I have been looking at http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html, but
there are various questions and answers about additional
permissions , but nothing in the direction of additional
restrictions that seem to match. From
Just whiling away the time...
On Apr 27, 2009, at 14:02 , mabshoff wrote:
SNIP
Well, IANAL. Looking at COPYING in Maxima's source distribution it
says:
[quote]
Maxima is dedicated to the memory of William F. Schelter. On 6
October
1998 William F. Schelter was formally notified that he
On Apr 27, 2:15 pm, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:02 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
I have been looking athttp://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html, but
there are various questions and answers about additional
permissions , but nothing in the
On Apr 26, 2009, at 12:21 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Apr 26, 2009, at 2:08 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
So when I am exposing a new class, i it's quite a lot of typing,
especially the name of the C++ class
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Apr 26, 2009, at 12:21 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
cdef struct c_WeakForm WeakForm:
void add_biform(int i, int j, ...)
void add_biform_surf(int i, int j, ...)
void add_liform(int i,
it'd be nice to have some easier way to handle C++ subclasses in
Cython. I don't know how it should be done though.
Good point. If we can declare inheritance information, I believe we
can use the same type infrastructure we use for cdef classes to
handle this smootly.
I second this. I
But there is certainly still the issue with distribution, i.e. the
trade press covered the [planned?] deployment of Debian by the
government of Cuba a couple weeks ago. I wonder who gets into trouble
for exporting Debian in that context - even though there is only a
minuscule chance that
29 matches
Mail list logo
