Hi John,
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:20 PM, John H Palmieri
jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
On sage.math, using the prebuilt binary, I'm getting a ton of errors,
mostly of the sort
TypeError: Unable to start maxima
Using the sage.math binary for Sage 4.1.2.alpha1 [1], upgrading that
Hi folks,
Compiling Sage 4.1.2.alpha2 from scratch went OK on 32-bit openSUSE
11.0. Here are the doctest failures on that platform:
** doctest failures on 32-bit openSUSE 11.0 **
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx
This does indeed look like a bug. I can't think of any reason off the
top of my head for the quotients to be different except that one of
them is wrong.
I'm currently working on the next FLINT release and will be sure to
address this problem. There will probably be two FLINT releases
relatively
Hi,
I was able to create a limited functionality separated sage notebook so far:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/patches/sagenb/
One key thing I did was abstract out how the worksheets communicate
with another python process. I then did a reference implementation of
the API. So
Hi!
I had a small look at it.
Of course, there is a lot of Sage code in it and it looks, as if you
have a lot
of partial problems, that will be specific to Sage/... .
So it seems, you will need some component architecture like
that we are using in RUM.
It is completely light weight.
The goal
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:27 AM, Michael Brickenstein
brickenst...@mfo.de wrote:
Hi!
I had a small look at it.
Of course, there is a lot of Sage code in it and it looks, as if you
have a lot
of partial problems, that will be specific to Sage/... .
Yes, there is of course a lot of Sage
Hi folks,
Sage 4.1.2.alpha2 compiles OK on x86 Fedora 9 (cicero on SkyNet) with
GCC 4.4.1. The following doctests failed:
** doctest failures on x86 Fedora 9 **
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/misc/randstate.pyx
**
File
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
Sage 4.1.2.alpha2 compiles OK on x86 Fedora 9 (cicero on SkyNet) with
GCC 4.4.1. The following doctests failed:
Compiles OK on x86_64 Fedora 9 (eno on SkyNet) with GCC 4.4.1. All
doctests pass.
--
Regards
On Sep 17, 9:39 pm, Pat LeSmithe qed...@gmail.com wrote:
Michelle Callaghan - Sun Microsystems wrote:
Sorry for crashing your thread, but I was just searching around to see
if anyone was running Sage on Solaris and I came upon your dicussions,
I just wondered if there is a specific
Hi Niels,
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:45:37 +0200
x x niels.lub...@gmail.com wrote:
Sage is a great project in my opinion, and i hope to contribute, when
i am more familiar with sage and python. I am not sure whether this
belongs to sage-support or sage-devel, since i don't understand the
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
Sage 4.1.2.alpha2 compiles fine on centos32 VM guest on boxen.math,
i.e. x86 CentOS 5.2. The following doctest fail:
** doctest failures for x86 CentOS 5.2 **
Builds fine on x86_64 RHEL 5.3 (lena on
I'll try and join. I'll be up until around noon CST.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 3:54 AM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Sep 21, 2009, at 12:40 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 03:46:50PM -0500, Jason Grout wrote:
We have been extremely blessed
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
Compiling Sage 4.1.2.alpha2 from scratch went OK on 32-bit openSUSE
11.0. Here are the doctest failures on that platform:
** doctest failures on 32-bit openSUSE 11.0 **
Builds OK on x86_64 openSUSE
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Builds fine on x86_64 RHEL 5.3 (lena on SkyNet) with GCC 4.4.1. All
doctests pass.
The same goes for centos64 VM guest on boxen.math, i.e. x86_64 CentOS 5.2.
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
Hi folks,
Sage 4.1.2.alpha2 compiles fine on centos32 VM guest on boxen.math,
i.e. x86 CentOS 5.2. The following doctest fail:
** doctest failures for x86 CentOS 5.2 **
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx
Michelle Callaghan - Sun Microsystems wrote:
Hi Guys,
Sorry for crashing your thread, but I was just searching around to see
if anyone was running Sage on Solaris and I came upon your dicussions,
I just wondered if there is a specific customer requirement that you
know of for Sage on Sun
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:54:20PM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
Please, please, please, finish up to review the remaining
categories on
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/wiki/CategoriesCategoriesReview!
I'll try to join, but Greenwich time won't be very compatible ...
Depends on how
Hi Nathann!
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 08:27:44PM +0200, Nathann Cohen wrote:
Linear Programming needs a way to merge programs, to obtain duals without
more than a call to a .dual() method, and a big database of Linear
Programs from where other ones can be easily defined.
Hi Tim,
Thanks for the response,
You'll probably want to use an iterator instead. It should be much
less memory-intensive. Additionally, ``xrange``s are especially
optimized for iteration.
database = CremonaDatabase().iter(xrange(1, 130001))
Yes, the code I wrote took a really long time.
I proposed making the lrs spkg standard about a year ago; Micheal
Abshoff then critiqued the optional spkg and gave me a list of things
I needed to do. I think I have done all of them, and I would very
much like to see lrs made standard to move the polytope functionality
forward. I really
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 4:53 AM, Marshall Hampton hampto...@gmail.com wrote:
I proposed making the lrs spkg standard about a year ago; Micheal
Abshoff then critiqued the optional spkg and gave me a list of things
I needed to do. I think I have done all of them, and I would very
much like
Marshall Hampton wrote:
I proposed making the lrs spkg standard about a year ago; Micheal
Abshoff then critiqued the optional spkg and gave me a list of things
I needed to do. I think I have done all of them, and I would very
much like to see lrs made standard to move the polytope
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 5:06 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 4:53 AM, Marshall Hampton hampto...@gmail.com wrote:
I proposed making the lrs spkg standard about a year ago; Micheal
Abshoff then critiqued the optional spkg and gave me a list of things
I needed
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 5:11 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
Marshall Hampton wrote:
I proposed making the lrs spkg standard about a year ago; Micheal
Abshoff then critiqued the optional spkg and gave me a list of things
I needed to do. I think I have done all of them,
On Sep 15, 10:46 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
* 96 tickets...
I haven't followed each thread lately, but are there any ideas how to
improve the review situation?
It might help if someone is responsible, therefore I propose to create
review coordinators, who are
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Harald Schilly
harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 15, 10:46 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
* 96 tickets...
I haven't followed each thread lately, but are there any ideas how to
improve the review situation?
It might help if someone
Since it's open source, can we not use it ourselves?
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 9:52 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Harald Schilly
harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 15, 10:46 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
* 96
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Tim Joseph Dumol t...@timdumol.com wrote:
Since it's open source, can we not use it ourselves?
Yes, I hope we will! Any volunteers to set it up?
Robert Bradshaw would be a good candidate since he used it all summer,
etc., however as his thesis adviser I really
Upgrade from 4.1.1.alpha1 finished, but then in building Sphinx docs
and when actually running failed due to readline:
ImportError: dlopen(/Users/.../sage-4.1.1/local/lib/python2.6/site-
packages/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_libsingular.so, 2):
Library not loaded:
On Sep 22, 3:52 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Bradshaw, who worked all summer at Google, said that they have
an incredibly good code review webapp there,...
rietveld? Well, it's better than trac i guess, but software alone
isn't everything.
Here an example for a sympy review
On Sep 22, 4:47 pm, Harald Schilly harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
Here an example for a sympy review in rietveld..
Ah, that's nice, click on expand comments to see annotations inside
diffs:
http://codereview.appspot.com/20078/diff/1/3
h
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
It seems that he was referring to a href=
http://code.google.com/p/rietveld/;Rietveld/a. If so, it doesn't seem we
can use it without a bit of modification, since it's for Subversion.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:28 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Tim
Hi,
Getting back on my late sage e-mails ...
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:25:50PM -0700, William Stein wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Robert
Bradshawrober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
What I'd rather see is something like
sage: R = Zmod(6)
sage: K =
Sorry, I mean't we *can't* use it without a bit of modification.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Tim Joseph Dumol t...@timdumol.com wrote:
It seems that he was referring to a href=
http://code.google.com/p/rietveld/;Rietveld/a. If so, it doesn't seem
we can use it without a bit of
On Arch Linux x86_64, had the same problem as kcrisman. Sage complained
about not finding `libreadline.so.5`. Fixed the problem by creating a
symlink to `libreadline.so`.
ImportError: libreadline.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file
or directory
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:28 PM,
I am just in the progress of seratating the component architecture.
I still have a test to
fix.
Then I'll upload it to bitbucket.
After that I'll have to upload it to PYPI, adjust RUM to use it.
Furthermore, I would like to create a wrapper for Pylons/TG2
(somewhere you have to hook in some
Hi sage-devel,
I am currently using Graphs and it is practical for me to create them
from dictionary of sets instead of dictionary of lists :
{{{
sage: e = {1 : set([2,3])}
sage: Graph(e).edges()
[(1, 2, None), (1, 3, None)]
}}}
Everything is fine, but loops are ignored :
{{{
sage: d = {1 :
Tim Joseph Dumol wrote:
Sorry, I mean't we *can't* use it without a bit of modification.
A google search for rietveld mercurial shows lots of work on this problem.
Jason
--
Jason Grout
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to
voila, here it is.
http://bitbucket.org/brickenstein/rumcomponent/src/tip/rumcomponent/
See test_component.py for examples.
Cheers,
Michael
On 22 Sep., 17:33, Michael Brickenstein brickenst...@mfo.de wrote:
I am just in the progress of seratating the component architecture.
I still have a test
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Please test and report all problems.
Error building the PDF version of the reference manual. This is now ticket #6988
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6988
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
Hi folks,
Sage 4.1.2.alpha2 fails to compile on t2.math, SPARC Solaris with GCC
4.4.1 and the Sun linker. This time the cause of the failure is due to
ticket #6596 [1] which upgrades Singular to version 3-1-0-4-20090723.
This failure has also been reported for Sage 4.1.2.alpha1. The
relevant
On Tuesday 22 September 2009 12:50 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
are all fixed and reported. Then all packages that are also in Sage
build in cygwin. After that, VTK has to be fixed, but then it seems to
build, only it takes insanely long (an hour or more), so I think I'll
skip it for now and
Built fine on OSX.5. However, get odd behavior of tab-completion.
Before, it would leave you in just the right spot to add (), but now
it goes exactly one space further, necessitating an awkward
backspace. Has anyone else noticed this?
- kcrisman
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Prabhu Ramachandran
pra...@aero.iitb.ac.in wrote:
On Tuesday 22 September 2009 12:50 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
are all fixed and reported. Then all packages that are also in Sage
build in cygwin. After that, VTK has to be fixed, but then it seems to
build,
Hi kcrisman,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:57 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Has anyone else noticed this?
Jason Grout reported this in IRC:
{{{
10:42 jason-6865 Has anyone noticed that with 4.1.2.alpha2, we have that old
problem with readline again where tab
As my work on prime_pi and nth_prime is drawing to a close, William
Stein and I have discussed the possibility of me making a graphical
physics program to be included in Sage, the free open source math
program.
An example of the desired functionality is to either with a few lines
of code from
On Sep 22, 2009, at 4:49 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
Hi,
Getting back on my late sage e-mails ...
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:25:50PM -0700, William Stein wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Robert
Bradshawrober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
What I'd rather see is something
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:14 AM, kstueve kevin.stu...@gmail.com wrote:
An example of the desired functionality is to either with a few lines
of code from within a Sage worksheet, or by clicking buttons in a
graphical user interface (GUI) create a physics problem with
components such as
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:14 AM, kstueve kevin.stu...@gmail.com wrote:
An example of the desired functionality is to either with a few lines
of code from within a Sage worksheet, or by clicking buttons in a
William Stein wrote:
Maybe he could provide an AJAX-style web-based interface to some
vpython functionality?
Since we also already have momentum for incorporating mayavi, we should
also point out the mayavi tvtk visual module, whose api is modeled
after vpython:
On Tuesday 22 September 2009 11:31 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
I think we are very close to actually provide a windows binary of
femhub in the next release, I feel it. So I'll be working on this, and
finish it this week.
That is great! Are you also rolling in the changes I submitted for Mac
OS
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Prabhu Ramachandran
pra...@aero.iitb.ac.in wrote:
On Tuesday 22 September 2009 11:31 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
I think we are very close to actually provide a windows binary of
femhub in the next release, I feel it. So I'll be working on this, and
finish it
Hi Minh,
obviously (look at your own trace output), you are talking about
singular-3-1-0-4-20090818.spkg, not
singular-3-1-0-4-20090723.spkg.
Just looking at the top entries of the SPKG.txt file of the old
(Sage-4.1.1) singular-3-1-0-2-20090620.p0.spkg, and of the current
Sage-4.1.2-alpha
I looked over the code in sage/graphs/graph.py and when you pass dict
of sets sage just calls the networkx library. However, its a bug that
the loops parameter is not passed correspondingly.
This is easy to get around:
sage: e = {1 : set([1,2,3])}
sage: import networkx
sage:
Hi,
concerning the libsingular/readline problem, I think that we just
should have added the Singular spkg as a new dependency for the
upgrade (because the Python extensions in the Sage library using it
depend on the readline library, see module_list.py).
Simply rebuilding the Singular spkg (and
A minor typo in the Constructions documentation. The
Constructions documentation says to send corrections
to sage-devel.
# HG changeset patch
# User Mariah Lenox mariah.le...@gmail.com
# Date 1253652415 14400
# Node ID bd65499b09ca9c88108908a609648850433dda8a
# Parent
Many thanks for this.
There is nothing I can do about this in the near future, for
various reasons, so if someone else wants to create a ticket for this,
that won't bother me:-) If not, I'll eventually get around to it though.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Mariah mariah.le...@gmail.com
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:14 AM, kstueve kevin.stu...@gmail.com wrote:
As my work on prime_pi and nth_prime is drawing to a close, William
Stein and I have discussed the possibility of me making a graphical
physics program to be included in Sage, the free open source math
program.
An
Hi Burcin,
Thanks for the explanation!
Symbolic ring is an unfortunate name. It doesn't mean much from the
mathematical point of view. It's just where all the symbolic stuff
live in Sage. Maybe we should call it symbolic parent.
I agree that the naming is unfortunate. I think it would be a
I spent a while thinking that I was going to be a mechanical engineer,
and took a few of the ME intro courses. Engineering statics and
dynamics can be phrased entirely in terms of linear algebra, though
the courses I took didn't present them as such. Materials analysis is
highly computational
Hi Mariah,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Mariah mariah.le...@gmail.com wrote:
A minor typo in the Constructions documentation. The
Constructions documentation says to send corrections
to sage-devel.
Thank you for reporting the bug. This is now ticket #6997 [1]. Your
patch has been
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:25:12AM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Sep 22, 2009, at 4:49 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
Variant:
sage: R = Zmod(6)
sage: R.set_category(Fields())# or maybe better R.add_category
(Fields())
sage: R in Fields()
True
sage:
Sorry if i am stating the obvious here, the reason is that i am trying
to explain why i think it should be (either implicit or explicit)
clear over which algebraic structure is computed.
Generally it is -- try parent(foo) or foo.parent() to see what
algebraic structure is in play.
sage:
Hi folks,
Sage 4.1.2.alpha2 compiles fine on x86 Debian 5. The following doctests failed:
{{{
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/crypto/boolean_function.pyx
**
File
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
Sage 4.1.2.alpha2 compiles fine on x86 Debian 5. The following doctests
failed:
The build machine is debian5-32, a VM guest on boxen.math.
Sage 4.1.2.alpha2 also builds on debian5-64, an x86_64 Debian 5 VM
Who will file ticket # 7000?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Compiled OK on fedora32 VM on boxen.math, i.e. x86 Fedora 10.
SNIP
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/interfaces/expect.py
sage -t -long
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Since we also already have momentum for incorporating mayavi, we should
also point out the mayavi tvtk visual module, whose api is modeled
after vpython:
Hi Minh,
The doctest failures in
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/interfaces/expect.py
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/interfaces/gp.py
are my fault - I forgot to include a 32-bit answer as well as the 64-
bit answer, e.g.
sage: gp(10.^80)._sage_repr()
On Sep 22, 7:10 pm, Felix Lawrence fe...@physics.usyd.edu.au wrote:
I've created a patch to apply these two trivial changes, but was
unsure what the etiquette is for fixing these doctest failures - I
imagine creating a new ticket would be overkill. Should I add the
patch to the original
Hi Felix,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Felix Lawrence
fe...@physics.usyd.edu.au wrote:
Hi Minh,
The doctest failures in
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/interfaces/expect.py
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/interfaces/gp.py
are my fault - I forgot to include a 32-bit answer
On Sep 23, 12:58 pm, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Felix,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Felix Lawrence
fe...@physics.usyd.edu.au wrote:
Hi Minh,
The doctest failures in
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/interfaces/expect.py
sage -t -long
-- Forwarded message --
From: Prof. Gregory V. Bard b...@fordham.edu
Date: Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 5:15 PM
Subject: the use of the t2 machine.
To: William Stein wst...@gmail.com, Tom Boothby boot...@u.washington.edu
I had a research question which required both
a lot of memory and
The goal of trac #6283 is 'Make it so NUM_THREADS is set intelligently
instead of idiotically in makefile so doing make ptest or make
ptestlong doesn't kill some computer'. Right now, NUM_THREADS (set in
SAGE_ROOT/makefile) is used for parallel testing if you do make
ptest or make ptestlong; the
74 matches
Mail list logo
