[sage-devel] Re: OS X (or BSD) testers needed

Confirming Justin on an older OS X: $ uname -a Darwin GC06259 15.6.0 Darwin Kernel Version 15.6.0: Mon Nov 13 21:58:35 PST 2017; root:xnu-3248.72.11~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64 $ gcc forksigaltstack.c -o forksigaltstack && ./forksigaltstack status = 4 -- You received this message because

Re: [sage-devel] Re: gambit does not build (sage 8.2.beta6)

See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21864 On Wednesday, February 21, 2018 at 4:41:10 AM UTC-8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > If somebody wants to fix this, you should try pip. gambit is currently > one of the few Python packages that are installed using the classical > setup.py script instead of

[sage-devel] Re: BUGS in tensor products of algebras

Hey Vit, Some of these issues are probably related to bad input. Let us start >> with *.algebras_generators(). It is useful to look at the output: >> >> sage: PBW.algebra_generators() >> Finite family {-alpha[1]: PBW[-alpha[1]], alpha[1]: PBW[alpha[1]], >> alphacheck[1]: PBW[alphacheck[1]]}

Re: [sage-devel] Re: OS X (or BSD) testers needed

Fun fact: in Apple's Swift language an array out of bounds access also terminates with SIGILL On Thursday, February 22, 2018 at 8:54:18 PM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2018-02-22 17:32, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > $ clang forksigaltstack.c -o forksigaltstack && ./forksigaltstack > > got

[sage-devel] Re: Problems building maxima in the sage 8.1 (stable)

Hi, Thanks for all the suggestions. I found the problem. Pretty stupid actually but sometimes it happens. I don't know how I couldn't think about that yesterday. When removing roswell from my environment I forgot to "make clean". Anyway if I ./configure again (witouth my local roswell in env)

Re: [sage-devel] OS X (or BSD) testers needed

> On Feb 22, 2018, at 07:10 , Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > If you have an OS X (or BSD) system installed with development tools, please > run: > > uname -a > gcc forksigaltstack.c -o forksigaltstack && ./forksigaltstack > > and post the output. This code is a reduction of a

Re: [sage-devel] Re: OS X (or BSD) testers needed

On 2018-02-22 17:32, Dima Pasechnik wrote: $ clang forksigaltstack.c -o forksigaltstack && ./forksigaltstack got signal 11 status = 0 Excellent. So it's only Apply who is crazy. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe

Re: [sage-devel] Re: embedding sage in c or c++

On Thursday, February 22, 2018 at 3:31:46 PM UTC, Erik Bray wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 11:44 AM, J. Javan > wrote: > > Dear Erik, > > > > I highly appreciate you for taking the time and helping people. > > Basically, we have some mathematical problems in a GUI

[sage-devel] Re: OS X (or BSD) testers needed

On Thursday, February 22, 2018 at 3:10:12 PM UTC, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > If you have an OS X (or BSD) system installed with development tools, > please run: > > uname -a > gcc forksigaltstack.c -o forksigaltstack && ./forksigaltstack > > and post the output. This code is a reduction of a

[sage-devel] Re: BUGS in tensor products of algebras

Hey Travis, thank you for clarification. Dne čtvrtek 22. února 2018 2:44:44 UTC+1 Travis Scrimshaw napsal(a): > > Hey Vit, >Some of these issues are probably related to bad input. Let us start > with *.algebras_generators(). It is useful to look at the output: > > sage:

Re: [sage-devel] OS X (or BSD) testers needed

$ uname -a Darwin John-iMac-2017.local 17.4.0 Darwin Kernel Version 17.4.0: Sun Dec 17 09:19:54 PST 2017; root:xnu-4570.41.2~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64 $ gcc forksigaltstack.c -o forksigaltstack && ./forksigaltstack status = 4 On Thursday, February 22, 2018 at 7:24:00 AM UTC-8, David Roe wrote:

Re: [sage-devel] Re: embedding sage in c or c++

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 11:44 AM, J. Javan wrote: > Dear Erik, > > I highly appreciate you for taking the time and helping people. > Basically, we have some mathematical problems in a GUI application > implemented in Qt-C++ which sage is capable of computing them. This is

Re: [sage-devel] OS X (or BSD) testers needed

Darwin Davids-MBP 16.7.0 Darwin Kernel Version 16.7.0: Thu Jun 15 17:36:27 PDT 2017; root:xnu-3789.70.16~2/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64 status = 4 On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 4:21 PM, David Joyner wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 10:16 AM, Jeroen Demeyer > wrote: >

Re: [sage-devel] OS X (or BSD) testers needed

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 10:16 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2018-02-22 16:13, David Joyner wrote: >> >> clang: error: no such file or directory: 'forksigaltstack.c' >> clang: error: no input files > > > Sorry, I obviously forgot to mention the step "copy the attached file >

Re: [sage-devel] OS X (or BSD) testers needed

On 2018-02-22 16:13, David Joyner wrote: clang: error: no such file or directory: 'forksigaltstack.c' clang: error: no input files Sorry, I obviously forgot to mention the step "copy the attached file forksigaltstack.c to the current working directory" and then run uname -a gcc

Re: [sage-devel] OS X (or BSD) testers needed

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 10:10 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > If you have an OS X (or BSD) system installed with development tools, please > run: > > uname -a > gcc forksigaltstack.c -o forksigaltstack && ./forksigaltstack > > and post the output. This code is a reduction of a

[sage-devel] OS X (or BSD) testers needed

If you have an OS X (or BSD) system installed with development tools, please run: uname -a gcc forksigaltstack.c -o forksigaltstack && ./forksigaltstack and post the output. This code is a reduction of a test failure in cysignals. I consider that failure to be an OS X bug. I want to have

Re: [sage-devel] [Crypto] S-box Linear Approximation Matrix scaling

I opened a ticket for this: #24819 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [sage-devel] Re: embedding sage in c or c++

Dear Erik, I highly appreciate you for taking the time and helping people. Basically, we have some mathematical problems in a GUI application implemented in Qt-C++ which sage is capable of computing them. This is why we decided to integrate sage in our app. However, As you mentioned it is a

[sage-devel] Re: Problems building maxima in the sage 8.1 (stable)

On Thursday, February 22, 2018 at 5:05:40 AM UTC, Robert Dodier wrote: > > On 2018-02-21, Matic Šavli wrote: > > > In particular, problems are with the package maxima-5.39.0.p0. > > I understand that sage will build local copy of ecl lisp implementation, > > which is