[sage-devel] Re: Beta 12 not building (Homebrew singular issue?)

2020-09-09 Thread Matthias Koeppe
You don't happen to set CFLAGS or CPPFLAGS by any chance? The problem in the failing compile command from your log is that "-I/Users/zscherr/sage/develop/local/include" appears after "-I/usr/local/include". It should appear before. gcc -Wno-unused-result -Wsign-compare -Wunreachable-code

[sage-devel] Re: Beta 12 not building (Homebrew singular issue?)

2020-09-09 Thread Zachary Scherr
Hi Matthias, Running ./sage -sh -c 'pkg-config --cflags singular' with home-brew's singular installed gives: -DSING_NDEBUG -DOM_NDEBUG -DSING_NDEBUG -DOM_NDEBUG -DSING_NDEBUG -DOM_NDEBUG -DSING_NDEBUG -DOM_NDEBUG -I/Users/zscherr/sage/develop/local/include/singular my env is a mess, but I

[sage-devel] Re: Beta 12 not building (Homebrew singular issue?)

2020-09-09 Thread Matthias Koeppe
On Wednesday, September 9, 2020 at 7:57:18 PM UTC-7, Matthias Koeppe wrote: > > On Wednesday, September 9, 2020 at 6:49:36 PM UTC-7, Zachary Scherr wrote: >> >>I tried to build the most recent beta version of sage and it would >> appear that it's taking issue with the fact that I have

[sage-devel] Re: Beta 12 not building (Homebrew singular issue?)

2020-09-09 Thread Matthias Koeppe
On Wednesday, September 9, 2020 at 6:49:36 PM UTC-7, Zachary Scherr wrote: > >I tried to build the most recent beta version of sage and it would > appear that it's taking issue with the fact that I have singular installed > on my Mac 10.15.6 through homebrew. Homebrew's version is singular

Re: [sage-devel] Policy proposal: spkg-configure.m4 script for all new standard Sage packages

2020-09-09 Thread Matthias Koeppe
On Wednesday, September 9, 2020 at 2:44:00 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 10:40 PM John H Palmieri > wrote: > >> I have a Sage policy proposal: >> >> - For any new standard Sage package PKG, we strongly recommend, require >> if at all possible, that the package

Re: [sage-devel] Policy proposal: spkg-configure.m4 script for all new standard Sage packages

2020-09-09 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 10:40 PM John H Palmieri wrote: > I have a Sage policy proposal: > > - For any new standard Sage package PKG, we strongly recommend, require if > at all possible, that the package comes with an spkg-configure.m4 script in > build/pkgs/PKG. There should also be a directory

[sage-devel] Policy proposal: spkg-configure.m4 script for all new standard Sage packages

2020-09-09 Thread John H Palmieri
I have a Sage policy proposal: - For any new standard Sage package PKG, we strongly recommend, require if at all possible, that the package comes with an spkg-configure.m4 script in build/pkgs/PKG. There should also be a directory build/pkgs/PKG/distros. Neither the spkg-configure.m4 file nor

[sage-devel] Re: Proposal to add "tox" as a standard package - entry point for testing and linting

2020-09-09 Thread Matthias Koeppe
On Monday, September 7, 2020 at 2:18:34 PM UTC-7, Matthias Koeppe wrote: > > tox (https://tox.readthedocs.io/en/latest/) is a popular package that is > used by a large number of Python projects as the standard entry point for > testing and linting. > [...] > I propose to make "tox" a standard