[sage-devel] Re: Memory Leak in canonical_label with bliss?

Hi Travis, I do not know whether the leak is caused within bliss or by sage's wrapper unfortunately. But can you reproduce the problem? Best, Thomas On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 2:49:07 AM UTC+2 Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > Hi Thomas, >Could the memleak be coming from within bliss? > > Best,

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5 released

On Friday, April 22, 2022 at 10:53:50 AM UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > On Friday, April 22, 2022 at 8:16:08 AM UTC-7 seb@gmail.com wrote: > >> For Ubuntu users the hint to use the systems standard package managers >> leads to an old version (9.0) >> > I agree, we should update our

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5 released

On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 12:17:27 PM UTC-7 David Roe wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 2:54 PM Matthias Koeppe > wrote: > >> All - https://www.sagemath.org/ now has a revised Download menu - please >> take a look. >> (thanks to Harald for merging my PR >>

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5 released

On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 2:54 PM Matthias Koeppe wrote: > All - https://www.sagemath.org/ now has a revised Download menu - please > take a look. > (thanks to Harald for merging my PR > https://github.com/sagemath/website/pull/238 > Very nice! Is there a way to set up our DNS so that the url is

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5 released

All - https://www.sagemath.org/ now has a revised Download menu - please take a look. (thanks to Harald for merging my PR https://github.com/sagemath/website/pull/238 On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 11:42:53 AM UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > Thanks, Marc, I've updated it in

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5 released

Thanks, Marc, I've updated it in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33655 On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 11:35:12 AM UTC-7 marc@gmail.com wrote: > Hi Matthias, > > I have one correction to the 9.6 installation manual. There are no longer > two choices for the macOS binary installation. There

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5 released

On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 4:27:21 AM UTC-7 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > The best way to accomplish the goal of "easy to install" is to make > sage easy to package. I agree with this one sentence of your long message. For those who want to help with this, here are a few tickets that could use

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5 released

Hi Matthias, I have one correction to the 9.6 installation manual. There are no longer two choices for the macOS binary installation. There is exactly one choice: a 1GB download which includes every optional package that we were able to build, except for those which can be installed with the

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5 released

On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 12:39:42 AM UTC-7 seb@gmail.com wrote: > Actually we no longer advertise the binary distribution. > > So, what do we advertise to potential newcomers to Sage? I think despite > such great things as Cocalc, SageMathCell and Gitpod, there should be > something

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5 released

On a seemingly unrelated note which is actually quite related, I don’t think it would be possible to find this out, but it would be interesting to know at what rate there has been user -> developer conversion over the years. Depends on the definition of conversion. In olden times, you might

[sage-devel] Re: Sage binary for macOS

Thanks for all your work on this! On Saturday, April 23, 2022 at 6:39:16 PM UTC-4 marc@gmail.com wrote: > A prelease version of the macOS Sagemath app based on Sage 9.6.rc0 has > been available on > github for about a week now. I am

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5 released

> Everyone agrees on that part, but how to go about it is a religious > matter. Truth. > I've been using sage, teaching with sage, writing papers that > cite sage, and giving presentations about my research that use sage for > about fifteen years. I have literally never met someone

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5 released

On Mon, 2022-04-25 at 00:39 -0700, seb@gmail.com wrote: > > So, what do we advertise to potential newcomers to Sage? I think despite > such great things as Cocalc, SageMathCell and Gitpod, there should be > something easy to install that can be used offline, too. > Everyone agrees on that

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5 released

I must confess I have never dealt with Magma… So let us talk about the ease of installation of the other 3. Guillermo On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 at 12:24, John Cremona wrote: > On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 at 11:18, G. M.-S. wrote: > > > > On macOS: A wonderful app, thanks to Marc Culler. > > > > On

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5 released

On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 at 11:18, G. M.-S. wrote: > > > On macOS: A wonderful app, thanks to Marc Culler. > > On Windows: Too complex for my far from savvy students. We are stuck with > SageMath 9.3 for the time being. > > On Linux: It depends on the distribution, some have totally outdated >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5 released

On macOS: A wonderful app, thanks to Marc Culler. On Windows: Too complex for my far from savvy students. We are stuck with SageMath 9.3 for the time being. On Linux: It depends on the distribution, some have totally outdated versions (as seen now and then in messages to sage-support). Most

Re: [sage-devel] Limitations of GAP interface

In case, one can in fact do this computation without the need to swithing to GAP, as follows: sage: libgap.LoadPackage("qpa") : Q=libgap.Quiver(3,[[1,2,"a"],[2,3,"b"]]) : KQ=libgap.PathAlgebra(libgap.GF(3),Q) : KQ.AssignGeneratorVariables() true ... #I Assigned the global variables [

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5 released

On Mon, 25 Apr 2022, 08:39 seb@gmail.com, wrote: > Actually we no longer advertise the binary distribution. > > So, what do we advertise to potential newcomers to Sage? I think despite > such great things as Cocalc, SageMathCell and Gitpod, there should be > something easy to install that

Re: [sage-devel] ~/.sage and sage-cleaner

PPS: It looks like the system is totally corrupted now after trying running top level sage without running configure. 'make all' now finished in 10 minutes with log files in logs/pkgs of 0 bytes. Please advise how to clean up the sage system, should ~/.sage be removed? Thank you for your help.

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5 released

Actually we no longer advertise the binary distribution. So, what do we advertise to potential newcomers to Sage? I think despite such great things as Cocalc, SageMathCell and Gitpod, there should be something easy to install that can be used offline, too. This could be done in