Re: [sage-devel] Re: Cannot build sage 10.4.beta6 [fflas_ffpack-2.5.0]

I could, but I know I will be messing up with my system flint installation in the future, and I would like to do that and keep sage happy. Cheers, Edgar On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 10:58 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 4:48 AM Edgar Costa > wrote: > > > &g

[sage-devel] Re: Cannot build sage 10.4.beta6 [fflas_ffpack-2.5.0]

t; On Tuesday, May 21, 2024 at 9:44:30 PM UTC+9 Edgar Costa wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Does someone has insights how t fix this? >> I already told ./configure --with-system-givaro=no and removed my >> installed givaro via homebrew. >> >

[sage-devel] Cannot build sage 10.4.beta6 [fflas_ffpack-2.5.0]

Hello, Does someone has insights how t fix this? I already told ./configure --with-system-givaro=no and removed my installed givaro via homebrew. You can find the logs here: https://gist.github.com/edgarcosta/32a8dd533cf88b937fa54194da7efe8d But the main issue is here: [fflas_ffpack-2.5.0]

Re: [sage-devel] pari-jupyter 1.4.3 release candidate

Bill Allombert has been working on a kernel via xeus: https://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/git/xeus-gp.git/ Which addresses many of the issues with the current one. While we for its first stable release, I recommend mine: https://github.com/edgarcosta/gp_kernel/ where I have addressed many of the

Re: [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: disputed PRs

+1 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit

Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Use "CI Fix" label for merging into continuous integration runs

+1 On Mon, Mar 4, 2024, 10:49 Giacomo Pope wrote: > +1 > > On Monday, March 4, 2024 at 1:57:48 PM UTC Dima Pasechnik wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 8:43 AM David Roe wrote: >> >>> The following proposal has been made several times the last few weeks: >>> in PR #37428

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Disputed Pull Requests / Role Sage-Abuse and the Code of Conduct

> > I suspect it's due to the latter used to Sage the distro as a "missing > macOS > package manager". > So they are happy adding more and more spkgs to Sage. > And Linux users rightly see adding to Sage spkgs, which > package software available on their systems in a regular way, > as a bloat,

Re: [sage-devel] how to enter a bug in the future for sagemath in github with no github account?

Dear Nasser, Please be constructive and transparent. It is already the norm that when people report bugs to sage-devel, when appropriate, a relevant GitHub issue is created. Best, Edgar On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 4:47 PM 'Nasser M. Abbasi' via sage-devel < sage-devel@googlegroups.com> wrote: >

Re: [sage-devel] Cython errors when building p_group_cohomology

Marc, you should try something like this: https://github.com/edgarcosta/pyfib/commit/f30cd702f5b8610a284b1b1f425ef22b2a2a11fa On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 6:49 PM Marc Culler wrote: > I am not able to build the optional package p_group_cohomology in 10.2.rc2 > due to cython errors. > > The first

Re: [sage-devel] Re: External cython cimports fail in Sage 10.2.beta8

e_support > > > > > On Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 5:00:08 PM UTC-7 Edgar Costa wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Cythonizing a package, via setuptools, that uses a `from sage.foo cimport >> bar` seems to no longer work with Sage 10.2.beta8 >> >> Here is

[sage-devel] External cython cimports fail in Sage 10.2.beta8

Hello, Cythonizing a package, via setuptools, that uses a `from sage.foo cimport bar` seems to no longer work with Sage 10.2.beta8 Here is a minimal example: sage -pip install git+https://github.com/edgarcosta/pyfib.git@main here is the error log:

Re: [sage-devel] Re: opinions requested on x + y behaviour for polynomials

Frederic, Magma is quite pedantic and doesn't let you do that. > R := PolynomialRing(Integers(),2); > S := PolynomialRing(Integers(),2); > x1 + y1; >> x1 + y1; ^ Runtime error in '+': Arguments are not compatible Argument types given: RngMPolElt, RngMPolElt However, I should also point

Re: [sage-devel] Memory leak (quite bad)

Two users try to use 51% of the memory simultaneously. On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 11:01 AM Nils Bruin wrote: > On Friday, 7 July 2023 at 07:53:22 UTC-7 Edgar Costa wrote: > > I'm okay with a user using 90% of the ram, if that becomes an issue, I can > always email them or kill t

Re: [sage-devel] Memory leak (quite bad)

uin wrote: > > > On Wednesday, 5 July 2023 at 08:29:44 UTC-7 Edgar Costa wrote: > > > > > > Hi Gonzalo, > > > > > > I highly recommend using https://github.com/rfjakob/earlyoom instead > of > > > waiting for OOM to kick in. > >

Re: [sage-devel] Memory leak (quite bad)

Hi Gonzalo, I highly recommend using https://github.com/rfjakob/earlyoom instead of waiting for OOM to kick in. Cheers, Edgar On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 11:24 AM Gonzalo Tornaria wrote: > This slowly and inexorably goes on. Computing `sqrt(T2)` leaks 32 bytes > each and every time

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Voting: Block-scoped optional tag and the keyword

I vote for (A) On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 6:27 PM Marc Culler wrote: > I vote for (C). > > On Wednesday, June 28, 2023 at 9:40:07 PM UTC-5 Kwankyu Lee wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We spent six days for the preliminary discussion in the sage-devel thread >> >>

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Why matrix powers are slower over Integers(p) than in ZZ?

Indeed, that is what we should use for single-word modulus. I think David and I wrote a wrapper at some point, but then we did not use it? On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 8:26 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > Flint has matrices mod n, see https://flintlib.org/doc/nmod_mat.html > I guess they should be fast

Re: [sage-devel] Re: images lacking on docker hub

I realized that one of my messages never got to the mailing list. If we agree that we would like to keep having this, then we should move the > old gitlab workflow to GitHub. > I have minimal experience building dockers, but these are quite convenient > when you suddenly break your sage due to

Re: [sage-devel] Re: images lacking on docker hub

Either Julian Ruth or whoever set up https://gitlab.com/sagemath/sage I have also asked on Zulip https://sagemath.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/271070-help---build/topic/Docker/near/357583892 Best, Edgar On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 8:27 AM Frédéric Chapoton wrote: > asking again : who has the

Re: [sage-devel] RealField isn't doing it right

You keep saying > Any normal mathematician who writes "e^1.1" intends that to mean "e^(11/10)". To be honest, I don't think that is the case, if a paper presented to you some constant gamma = 1.1, you would not assume that gamma is 11/10, but instead that an approximation to 2 decimal digits for

Re: [sage-devel] RealField isn't doing it right

> > It's reasonable to expect that multiplying by one won't cause a viable > alternative to Mathematica et al. to go bonkers. I haven't declared a > float variable, and I haven't type-cast anything to float. The > expression "0.5" is, a priori, quite equal to 1/2. Mathematica knows > it > I

Re: [sage-devel] Procedure to be a member of sage github organization

Most likely not the status quo at the moment, but if a PR is not ready to be reviewed should be marked as a draft, which the author can do without any special permissions. Otherwise, I would assume the PR is ready to be reviewed. On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 9:43 PM Trevor Karn wrote: > How do new

[sage-devel] Re: VOTE: move Sage development to Github

+1 for Github On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 1:23:36 PM UTC-4 David Roe wrote: > Dear Sage developers, > Following extensive discussion, both recently > > (prompted > by issues upgrading the trac server) and over >