As I mentioned in the thread that motivated this one, it would be relevant
to stablish if it is possible to move those packages from standard to pip,
while still having a way to install sage without an internet connection.
If the effort is not too much, I think it would make sense to provide
Maybe you can get the best of both worlds? I mean: use those packages as
pip packages, but also have a way to download a big tarball with those
packages, and then pip-install them from that local copy?
El domingo, 11 de febrero de 2024 a las 15:50:17 UTC+1, Kwankyu Lee
escribió:
> How about
ntrast to just linking to a Wikipedia page for a definition, this could
> be doctested and roundtripped.
>
> Matthias
>
> On Saturday, February 10, 2024 at 8:50:42 AM UTC-8 mmarco wrote:
>
> One question, Matthias: I see that you have proposed a project involving
> integration with proo
One question, Matthias: I see that you have proposed a project involving
integration with proof assistants/theorem provers. Just out of curiosity:
how do you envision such integration?
El martes, 6 de febrero de 2024 a las 6:56:44 UTC+1, Matthias Koeppe
escribió:
> Great, thanks a lot,
FWIW, we are working on a python package that partially overlaps sagetex
functionality:
https://framagit.org/pang/texsurgery
El lunes, 6 de diciembre de 2021 a las 19:06:47 UTC+1, Matthias Koeppe
escribió:
> -1 on demoting it from standard. It's tiny, and installing it as part of
> the
+1
El martes, 23 de noviembre de 2021 a las 11:31:19 UTC+1, vdelecroix
escribió:
> +1 for using standard and efficient libraries instead of slow and
> buggy sage implementations :-)
>
> Thanks
> Vincent
>
> Le 23/11/2021 à 11:26, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
> > primecount is a popular C++ library
I got to make it work, but the code still needs to be checked for memory
leaks or other subtle pointer related issues.
Reviews welcome.
El lunes, 4 de octubre de 2021 a las 18:52:10 UTC+2, mmarco escribió:
>
> I have retaken the work in #16567 to support rings with parameters in
> li
I have retaken the work in #16567 to support rings with parameters in
libsingular.
The ring creation works, but I am stuck with the conversion of coefficients
from sage to singular and back.
The code I have now is cythonized without complains, but then the c
compilation fails with an error
That actually worked. Thanks!
El lunes, 5 de abril de 2021 a las 23:29:25 UTC+2, Michael Orlitzky
escribió:
> On Mon, 2021-04-05 at 21:43 +0100, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > internet says it might have to do with wrong permissions to /tmp or
> > TMPDIR pointing to a directory with wrong
Don't think that is the case. The error message is different, and also, the
problem persist even after applying the patch.
El lunes, 5 de abril de 2021 a las 23:29:25 UTC+2, Michael Orlitzky
escribió:
> On Mon, 2021-04-05 at 21:43 +0100, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > internet says it might have to
ght have to do with wrong permissions to /tmp or
> TMPDIR pointing to a directory with wrong permissions.
>
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 6:38 PM mmarco wrote:
> >
> >
> > I am getting this kind of error messages when trying to run `make test`
> or `sage -t file.py`:
&
I am getting this kind of error messages when trying to run `make test` or
`sage -t file.py`:
Using --optional=build,dochtml,gentoo,kenzo,memlimit,pip,sage,sage_spkg
Doctesting entire Sage library.
Doctesting 4271 files.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/mmarco/sage/src/bin
I have participated as mentor other years... but this year I just don't
think I have the needed energy.
I think Harald's proposal to pass this year and reconsider the next one
makes sense (sadly).
El domingo, 7 de febrero de 2021 a las 17:54:07 UTC+1, harald@gmail.com
escribió:
> Hi, a
I have just published a paper there, with the Sage code to compute minimal
models of GCDA's. So it is certainly possible to publish Sage papers there,
but my impression is that the journal is more geared towards publishing
"external packages" (which might fit with the workflow of systems like
You mean having a function (or global variable) to set which will be the
default backend?
I find that having a workflow consisting on expressions like:
integrate(foo,x,algorithm='giac')
is not specially comfortable, but even then, I prefear it to something like:
+1
Also, I suggest that we consider the possibility of using giac as the
default backend for symbolic integration.
El lunes, 3 de febrero de 2020, 23:52:44 (UTC+1), Samuel Lelievre escribió:
>
> Please vote for making giacpy_sage a standard package. See
>
> - Sage Trac ticket: 28918
> Make
>
>
> The second may be a bug in the patchbot server itself. I have no time to
> investigate. Maybe the # in the patchbot name is not a good idea (random
> guess) ?
>
>
It looks like that could be the culprit, since It also happens in other
machines. Any idea on how it could be solved?
--
For completeness, the problem of the log not being sent is also present in
another VM running arch:
https://patchbot.sagemath.org/log/0/Linux/#1%20SMP%20PREEMPT%20Fri,%2029%20Nov%202019%2013:37:24%20+/x86_64/5.4.1-arch1-1/patchbot-arch/2019-12-10%2008:19:07
Maybe some trouble of the
>
>
> The second may be a bug in the patchbot server itself. I have no time to
> investigate. Maybe the # in the patchbot name is not a good idea (random
> guess) ?
>
> F
>
I see. Is there a command to uninstall a package? or should I edit some
file manually?
I will try avoiding the number
I am setting up several virtual machines with different distros to run
patchbots on them. In particular I want to use different distros (including
less usual ones) to get more diversity in the patchbot set.
However, I am finding some problems:
A debian machine is returning the following error
Great, now fflas_ffpack complains about not finding blas
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this
?? with the correct value, and rebuild...
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 4:09 PM mmarco >
> wrote:
> >
> > I am trying to setup several virtual machines to run patchbots (for
> different distros). I am getting the following error when trying to compile
> Sage from source:
>
I am trying to setup several virtual machines to run patchbots (for
different distros). I am getting the following error when trying to compile
Sage from source:
n not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
20 Nov 2019 at 18:09, mmarco >
> wrote:
>
>> I see, thanks.
>>
>> Is it a default behaviour?
>>
>
> no, it appears that you have a weird configuration, e.g. I have libblas
> installed systemwide, but things just work.
> Perhaps it is a Numpy bug.
>
>&
I see, thanks.
Is it a default behaviour?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the
The log shows this:
FOUND:
libraries = ['openblas', 'blas']
library_dirs = ['/home/mmarco/sagep3/local/lib', '/usr/lib64']
include_dirs = ['/usr/include', '/home/mmarco/sagep3/local/include']
language = c
--
FOUND:
define_macros = [('NO_ATLAS_INFO', 1), ('HAVE_CBLAS
I didn't do anything specific to try to use external blas/lapack. How can I
check if sage is trying to?
El miércoles, 20 de noviembre de 2019, 10:01:14 (UTC+1), Dima Pasechnik
escribió:
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 8:26 AM mmarco >
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
>
If all the issues ar solved... sure. I was even surprised that we started
haviong betas of version 9 with python 2 (I assumed that the witch to
version 9 would be mostly about the transition to python 3).
+1
El domingo, 27 de octubre de 2019, 1:58:23 (UTC+2), Volker Braun escribió:
>
> Maybe I
I would be very interested in comparing their results with RUBI.
El viernes, 27 de septiembre de 2019, 21:53:00 (UTC+2), Eric Gourgoulhon
escribió:
>
> Thanks for sharing!
> This looks very promising. I hope we have it in Sage some day.
>
> Eric.
>
> Le vendredi 27 septembre 2019 17:06:31 UTC+2,
I get an Internal Server Error when I try to access the patchbot. In
particular, I can't see patchbot reports for any ticket.
To make sure that it is not a problem with my network: does anybody else
experience the same?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
I think the change you propose is reasonable. However, it sounds like a lot
of work, and the support for python2 ends in just a few months. We should
aim to release a python3 based release that passes all tests before the end
of the year.
Do you think it is reasonable to do these deep changes
This is now #28415
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28415
El lunes, 19 de agosto de 2019, 13:24:10 (UTC+2), mmarco escribió:
>
> I have been working a bit on some functions to help students do
> integration by hands. Under the hood, they use sympy's integral_steps
> function (see
Ups, I wrote it wrong. His name is Grayson Jorgenson, not Jayson.
El viernes, 23 de agosto de 2019, 20:59:17 (UTC+2), mmarco escribió:
>
> Jayson Jorgenson implemented resolution of singularities for plane curves
> as a GSoC project a few years ago:
>
>
> https://doc.sa
Jayson Jorgenson implemented resolution of singularities for plane curves
as a GSoC project a few years ago:
https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/curves/sage/schemes/curves/affine_curve.html
But I guess you are talking about the general case.
IIRC, singular returns the output of the
BTW
El martes, 20 de agosto de 2019, 5:44:33 (UTC+2), rjf escribió:
>
> It may be a mistake to combine "help for students learning symbolic
> integration"
> and "symbolic integration" simply because the methods taught to students
> are probably different from the integration algorithms used by
>
>
> The link below to docs did not work for me until I added an "l' to make
> it html.
>
You are right, sorry for the broken link.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
I have been working a bit on some functions to help students do integration
by hands. Under the hood, they use sympy's integral_steps function (see
[1]), but I am not sure which is the right way to present it. The options I
am considering are:
1) Go full step-by-step integrations, in the
You might be interested in taking a look at tides [1]. It is a library for
integration of ODE's in high precission using precisely automatic
differentiation and Taylor arithmetic. It doesn't use interval arithemtic
(so, no certified computation), but maybe some ideas could be useful.
The way it
>
>
> None of these will really help in this case. Without abs_integrate, you
> get no answer. With abs_integrate, you get the wrong answer. This one
> will probably have to be fixed in Maxima.
>
Going from a wrong answer to no answer is an improvement. So yes, it does
help in this case.
The proposal of not using abs_integrate by default, and provide the option
of using it it with an algorithm keyword seems the most logical to me.
El viernes, 22 de marzo de 2019, 16:46:38 (UTC+1), Nils Bruin escribió:
>
> On Friday, March 22, 2019 at 3:00:54 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
So the bug is really in the abs_integrate package for maxima? In that case:
is it really worth it to import it by default?
El miércoles, 20 de marzo de 2019, 13:58:46 (UTC+1), Dima Pasechnik
escribió:
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 05:36:59AM -0700, mmarco wrote:
> > I am trying
I am trying to pinpoint the following bug:
sage: integral(sqrt(1+cos(x)^2),x)
-1/24*sin(3*x) + 1/8*sin(x)
which is incorrect. One would think that maxima is returning a wrong
answer, but if we ask directly to maxima, it leaves the integral as it is:
sage: f = sqrt(1+cos(x)^2)
sage:
About that, I dealt with that for a test installation if
jupyterhub/jupyterlab i am working in at my university.
My solution consisted in two parts:
1) Copying the threejs files to a directory where the jupyterhub server can
serve them (in my case, it was /usr/local/share/jupyterhub/static/ )
Is there any essential reason why online=False can not work on nbviewer or
mybinder? If it can be solved, I think it makes more sense to make it work
without breaking the default behaviour when there is no internet available.
El lunes, 11 de febrero de 2019, 18:31:33 (UTC+1), Eric Gourgoulhon
hing to do - perhaps I
> miss something trvial here...
> 12:13 < phoe> you don't want to use Quicklisp in that case
> 12:13 < phoe> quicklisp operates with the assumption that users can
> download arbitrary stuff into the Quicklisp directory
> 12:14 < phoe> basi
gt; On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 8:32 PM mmarco >
> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, but what I mean is that when you do that, kenzo code is compiled
> into the user's home directory (look under ~/quicklisp). So if there are
> several users in the same machine, it will be compiled for
Pasechnik escribió:
>
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 4:23 PM mmarco >
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the answers.
> >
> > I just realized that the package I want to install is available by
> quicklisp, so maybe it would be easyer to install it using that.
> >
Thanks for the answers.
I just realized that the package I want to install is available by
quicklisp, so maybe it would be easyer to install it using that.
However I noticed that quicklisp installs evetything in the users home
directory, even if it is called from the sage environment. That
I am working in a Kenzo interface/optional package. I managed to load
through the ecl interface, but using asdf, but in order to do that I had to
have it installed in my ~/common-lisp/ directory. As an optional package,
it should be located in some directory of the sage install, that must be
Maybe I could mentor a student, but don't have in mind any specific project
proposal right now. WIll think about it.
El martes, 15 de enero de 2019, 21:28:16 (UTC+1), Harald Schilly escribió:
>
> Hi everyone. This years Google Summer of Code 2019 just started. Should we
> write an application?
I would be interested in that too, but that sounds like a complex task. I
think one or more GSoC projects could fit into that... and maybe also some
thematic Sage Days.
El jueves, 22 de noviembre de 2018, 11:28:32 (UTC+1), Dima Pasechnik
escribió:
>
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 9:43 AM parisse >
That is exactly the case: the cocoalib package is just that for the moment:
a way to install cocoalib from sage.
The plan when that was done was to write a cython interface , but that
hasn't been done yet. Since cocoalib is a very big library, I think it
would be a good idea to do so
Do you know if something similar exists for jupyterlab?
El sábado, 4 de agosto de 2018, 10:56:39 (UTC+2), Volker Braun escribió:
>
> There is a jupyter extension for that, though I haven't tried it...
>
>
>
Ok, let me know if you can verify that libbraiding works on cygwin.
El jueves, 28 de junio de 2018, 17:27:54 (UTC+2), Erik Bray escribió:
>
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 5:25 PM mmarco >
> wrote:
> >
> > The packages libbraiding and libhomfly have been optional
The packages libbraiding and libhomfly have been optional for more than a
year. They provide methods for braids and knots that many people find
useful, so I propose to make them standard packages.
Are you ok with that?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
What about creating a `is_prime_integer` function? Explicit is better than
implicit, and in that case we leave no ambiguity in the mathematical sense,
but also cover the use case of the casual user.
What i definitely don't want is `.is_prime()` return `True` when it is
applied to an element
jupyterhub or not.
El domingo, 4 de marzo de 2018, 0:42:43 (UTC+1), Kwankyu Lee escribió:
>
>
>
> On Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 1:17:40 AM UTC+9, mmarco wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, I finally could solve it with a dirty hack:
>>
>> I put the nbextensions inside /usr/local/sha
:27 (UTC+1), Kwankyu Lee escribió:
>
>
>
> On Friday, March 2, 2018 at 12:30:29 AM UTC+9, mmarco wrote:
>>
>> I am trying to install a service to use Sage through the jupyterlab
>> frontend, behind a jupyterhub server.
>>
>> So far, I could get everyt
I am trying to install a service to use Sage through the jupyterlab
frontend, behind a jupyterhub server.
So far, I could get everything to work, even the threejs interactive
graphics on a standalone jupyterlab instance. In order to make it run I
just copied the corresponding nbextension
+1
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
shcedule.
Best,
Miguel
El martes, 7 de noviembre de 2017, 13:04:00 (UTC+1), Simon King escribió:
>
> Hi Miguel,
>
> On 2017-11-07, mmarco <mma...@unizar.es > wrote:
> > - The sage development workflow (Trac, git, doctests...) -> Eric
> > Gourgoulhon
> >
me
> this doesn't happen as often as one wants.
>
> Best,
> Travis
>
> On Wednesday, November 8, 2017 at 2:33:13 AM UTC+10, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>>
>> On 2017-11-07 12:26, mmarco wrote:
>> > I have to clarify: Tomer Bauer did not volunteer to give a talk abou
I have to clarify: Tomer Bauer did not volunteer to give a talk about
creating extensions; he actually showed interest in learning about it. He
mostly means following this approach:
https://github.com/sagemath/sage_sample
Any takers?
El martes, 7 de noviembre de 2017, 10:32:19 (UTC+1), mmarco
Consdering your offers, I made a temptative assignation of the subjects to
cover:
- The sage development workflow (Trac, git, doctests...) -> Eric
Gourgoulhon
- The coercion model & Implementation of Parents and elements -> Simon King
- The category framework -> Travis Scrimshaw
- Cython &
I have created the wiki page: https://wiki.sagemath.org/days94
Please feel free to edit it if you want to add more information (for
instance, if you want to assign a course to yourself). I will add more
information as we get more details figured out.
Best,
Miguel.
--
You received this
Thank you all!
If it is ok with you, I will create a wiki page to keep track of the
organization details. As soon as we can close the dates (maybe next week),
I) will let you know.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe
Hello,
We will be organizing the next meeting of the spanish network of computer
algebra in Zaragoza (Spain); the proposed dates are July 4th-6th. As a
satellite event we plan to organize also a Sage Days (right before, or
right after the meeting), in the form of a school oriented to
Indeed. This last GSoC there was some work to include the Rubi integrator
in sympy. That could allow to compute a larger set of integrals (although I
have read that it can be kind of slow). It would be a good idea to consider
which one of these options we should call by default in each case.
This is now #23395 <https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23395>
El lunes, 10 de julio de 2017, 13:43:46 (UTC+2), mmarco escribió:
>
> If you used quo_rem, beware that Sage only uses Singular if the
> coefficient ring is a field. So if you define your polynomials over QQ
> instead
we could rely on Singular also for the case of Integers.
El lunes, 10 de julio de 2017, 12:48:55 (UTC+2), mmarco escribió:
>
> It is surprising the difference between singular and Sage, considering
> that Sage mostly relies on Singular for multivariate polynomial arithmetic.
>
we could rely on Singular also for the case of Integers.
El lunes, 10 de julio de 2017, 12:48:55 (UTC+2), mmarco escribió:
>
> It is surprising the difference between singular and Sage, considering
> that Sage mostly relies on Singular for multivariate polynomial arithmetic.
>
It is surprising the difference between singular and Sage, considering that
Sage mostly relies on Singular for multivariate polynomial arithmetic. In
the case of divisions, I suspect that it has to do with the fact that Sage
treats division of polynomials as an operation in the fraction field,
FWIW I have recently written a library that performs certified root
continuation of bivariate polynomials. It makes extensive use of MPFR, and
plan to include it as a Sage package. So, since the goal is to make
certified computations, it would be really nice to have a formal proof of
the
I recommend you to start by reading the sage developer guide:
http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/index.html
It covers all the development process.
I am no expert in Coxeter groups, but from what I see, we already have
support for them in Sage. So I will assume that your software would
Does that work on all the platforms supported by anaconda, or is it linux
only?
El jueves, 23 de marzo de 2017, 5:29:31 (UTC+1), Isuru Fernando escribió:
>
> Hi,
>
> Update: With the help of Erik and Julian, we now have all the runtime
> dependencies of sage in conda-forge.
>
> There are some
increase the number of cases that we can integrate, the first step
would be to have some support for simplification rules.
El martes, 28 de febrero de 2017, 18:01:58 (UTC+1), parisse escribió:
>
>
>
> Le mardi 28 février 2017 15:57:53 UTC+1, mmarco a écrit :
>>
>> Many RUBI r
of degree 2). But perhaps I misunderstand Rubi, and it
> does that inside Mathematica?
>
> Le mardi 28 février 2017 10:50:50 UTC+1, mmarco a écrit :
>>
>>
>>> Back to the original proposal. Certainly rules can't catch all cases
>>> either. Doesn't this
>
>
> Back to the original proposal. Certainly rules can't catch all cases
> either. Doesn't this call for a combined approach? As soon as we have rules
> in Sage they should be called before the best algorithm we have. The
> default then IMO should be "special rules + Maxima" instead of
>
>
>
> I think that it might be possible to wrile (in Python ?) a "Ruby rules
> compiler" that could use our (rudimentary) wildcard facility to effect
> those substitutions. A possible companion would be a "Mathematica compiler"
> able to translate a Mathematica Integrate statement and
UTC+1, mmarco wrote:
>>
>> cdef extern from "my_library.h":
>> mpfr_t* my_function (mpfr_t *_coef)
>>
>
>
> That isn't exactly idiomatic C++, but ok
>
>
> /home/mmarco/sage/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/IPython/core/ultratb.pyc
&
tion at all.
>
> Le 05/02/2017 à 11:40, Vincent Delecroix a écrit :
> > If you had a look at the code I provided you can check that what you did
> > is very wrong.
> >
> > mpfr_t is already an array. The type "mpfr_t * x" make no sense at all.
> >
icodeDecodeErrorTraceback (most recent call last)
/home/mmarco/sage/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/IPython/core/
interactiveshell.pyc in run_code(self, code_obj, result)
2896 if result is not None:
2897 result.error_in_exec = sys.exc_in
I am working in a C++ library that provides some certified homotopy
continuations. It provides a function that, takes as input a list of
floating point numbres and returns another such list.
I am having a lot of trouble trying to write a sage-cython interface for
mpfr floats (the version for
I am not sure I will have time to be a mentor this year, but I would like
to propose porting rubi to sage:
http://www.apmaths.uwo.ca/~arich/
It is a series of rules (over 6000) to be applied to symbolic expressions
in order to get their primitive. The results they produce are better than
the
If you provide several binaries, I think it would be wise to advertise the
lowest common denominator as the "standard" one, so it works for every
user.
El miércoles, 14 de diciembre de 2016, 12:59:13 (UTC+1), Erik Bray escribió:
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Erik Bray
On Thursday, December 8, 2016 at 8:41:55 PM UTC, mmarco wrote:
>>
>> If I am not mistaken, the reference manual is automatically built from
>> the docstrings in the source code files... which are GPL. How does that
>> affect the resulting documentation?
>>
>
If I am not mistaken, the reference manual is automatically built from the
docstrings in the source code files... which are GPL. How does that affect
the resulting documentation?
El jueves, 8 de diciembre de 2016, 17:17:19 (UTC+1), Dima Pasechnik
escribió:
>
> As pointed out in
>
If this is of any help, this is what I use:
https://github.com/miguelmarco/pykdedebugger
El sábado, 26 de noviembre de 2016, 8:25:02 (UTC+1), Maxie Schmidt escribió:
>
> I've been looking at GUI-based (or at least text-GUI-based) python
> debuggers to help with fixing bugs in a larger python
The way I would handle those cases, is by raising an exception. The same
way that you raise an exception when the software is not able to give any
other answer that you might ask.
El martes, 15 de noviembre de 2016, 8:22:15 (UTC+1), tdumont escribió:
>
> When developing a software which aims
Both results are equivalent in this case (the given charts actually differ
only by a change of coordinates), but I am not sure why the difference has
appeared. I will try to have a look at it in the following days (although
don't have much time available lately). Is it possible that Singular 4
Since we are talking about the wiki... I would propose to use another
default theme. From my perspective, the default theme looks much worse than
other possibilities:
https://moinmo.in/ThemeMarket
Even if we don't want to install anything, just changing the default to the
righsidebar one
I am really happy to see her using (and endorsing) Sage. Apparently she
will publish some code in November. I am not completely sure she is talking
about lattice based crypto. There are other possibilities, (code-based,
isogenies...) for which Sage could also be useful.
Maybe this will attract
Trying to `git trac push` I get the following error message. Is it expected
or someone is trying to MITM me?
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/mmarco/git-trac-command/bin/git-trac", line 18, in
cmdline.launch()
File "/home/mmarco/git-trac-command/git_trac/cm
Non units are not interval in the same parent, but might be in a bigger
one (think of the fraction field of a ring). The question is to have a
method that tries to invert the object even if it has to go to a bigger
parent; and a different one that tries to find the inverse in the same
parent,
+1
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Do we really need cloudflare for this?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email
It seems to be ok now. Thanks.
El lunes, 20 de junio de 2016, 4:19:50 (UTC+2), William escribió:
>
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 4:09 AM, mmarco <mma...@unizar.es >
> wrote:
> > Did you recently enable cloudflare cache services?
> >
> > I am using Tor to circunv
Did you recently enable cloudflare cache services?
I am using Tor to circunvent some pesky firewall, and when trying to push
some changes, I get some git_trac.trac_error.TracConnectionError: Forbidden
error.
Would it be possible to disable cloudflare? Or at least, to use the option
to not
El miércoles, 8 de junio de 2016, 15:46:47 (UTC+2), Frédéric Chapoton
escribió:
>
> What about https for patchbot.sagemath.org ?
>
> @mmarco, I can open an account for you on this machine if you want.
>
>
Sure. If you give me an email address, I can send you my RSA keys.
T
I volunteered some time ago to set up a letsencrypt certificate in the
wiki. I didn't include trac server in that move because there was already
the option for https, but I agree it would be better to make it https only.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
1 - 100 of 619 matches
Mail list logo
