[sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Categories for extensions types

2010-01-15 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 04:05:29PM -0800, Robert Bradshaw wrote: I actually went to that ticket a bit ago, but didn't see any patch attached. I'll certainly review this during Sage days if no one else beats me to it. Excellent! For the record: all tests passed this night on my machine with

Re: [sage-devel] Categories for extensions types

2010-01-15 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 04:05:29PM -0800, Robert Bradshaw wrote: I actually went to that ticket a bit ago, but didn't see any patch attached. I'll certainly review this during Sage days if no one else beats me to it. Excellent! For the record: all tests passed this night on my machine with

[sage-devel] Categories for extensions types

2010-01-14 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Hi, Given the recent discussion on adding generic group features, it was way time for someone to go one step further: to enable extension types to inherit code from categories, so that we could at last start to systematically put generic code in the categories instead of the old abstract

Re: [sage-devel] Categories for extensions types

2010-01-14 Thread Robert Bradshaw
I actually went to that ticket a bit ago, but didn't see any patch attached. I'll certainly review this during Sage days if no one else beats me to it. - Robert On Jan 14, 2010, at 3:24 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: Hi, Given the recent discussion on adding generic group features,

Re: [sage-devel] Categories for extensions types

2010-01-14 Thread David Roe
I'm not going to be available until early next week, so it sounds like someone else will get to it before me. I'm excited to see it though! David On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote: I actually went to that ticket a bit ago, but didn't see any