On 2015-08-26 17:49, John H Palmieri wrote:
So there is a problem:
although the graphs docs should have failed the first time through, the
second time through, the docbuilder thought that it had built fine.
The problem is that docs which are built with an error are still
considered built. The
On Tuesday, August 25, 2015 at 10:55:01 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
On Tuesday, 25 August 2015 20:43:43 UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote:
I'd say that the problem is the error-reporting: there was certainly an
error at least one docstring, it was just reporting the wrong one. I didn't
I'd say that the problem is the error-reporting: there was certainly an
error at least one docstring, it was just reporting the wrong one. I didn't
see any evidence of docbuilding itself being flaky.
John
On Tuesday, August 25, 2015 at 8:05:23 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
thanks to
thanks to John Palmieri, who suggested some non-obvious patches, I can
again use -jN with N1 on this branch.
Still, this is very disturbing that sage -docbuild is so flaky...
On Tuesday, 25 August 2015 14:34:21 UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
On Tuesday, 25 August 2015 14:11:05 UTC-7, Dima
On Tuesday, 25 August 2015 20:43:43 UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote:
I'd say that the problem is the error-reporting: there was certainly an
error at least one docstring, it was just reporting the wrong one. I didn't
see any evidence of docbuilding itself being flaky.
what did not work with
Is it well-known to be a constant issue that I was not aware of? Or is it
a regression?
Do I say the obvious if I answer that nobody is likely to answer your
question if you do not even tell what is the bug that you meet?
Nathann
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
On Tuesday, 25 August 2015 14:11:05 UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
On Tuesday, 25 August 2015 13:26:25 UTC-7, Nathann Cohen wrote:
Is it well-known to be a constant issue that I was not aware of? Or is it
a regression?
Do I say the obvious if I answer that nobody is likely to answer
On Tuesday, 25 August 2015 13:26:25 UTC-7, Nathann Cohen wrote:
Is it well-known to be a constant issue that I was not aware of? Or is it
a regression?
Do I say the obvious if I answer that nobody is likely to answer your
question if you do not even tell what is the bug that you meet?
