Re: [sage-devel] Re: Application for NumFOCUS affiliation of SageMath

Thanks a lot, William. I've submitted our application to NumFOCUS today to meet the Apr 15 deadline. I'll keep everyone posted as soon as I hear anything back. On Sunday, March 10, 2024 at 9:05:36 AM UTC-7 William Stein wrote: > Hi, > > I also strongly support this initiative for Sage to join

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Application for NumFOCUS affiliation of SageMath

Hi, I also strongly support this initiative for Sage to join NumFocus at this point in time. Regarding Cython, I made up the name in maybe 2008, and started it as a project by combining "Pyrex" that Greg Ewing worked on periodically, my own fork of Pyrex that had features I added that were

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Application for NumFOCUS affiliation of SageMath

I support Matthias' initiative to join NumFocus. Looking at the application , there are only a few todo items: * Describe the shared history with Cython and IPython. This doesn't need to be extensive, but would be useful. * If we update the code of

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Application for NumFOCUS affiliation of SageMath

I don't think one needs to read between the lines. Per https://jupyter.org/governance/linux-proposal.html#project-jupyter-s-needs it's about funding goals in the $1-$2 million range + permanent staffing + support for "operating" (which is described there as "legal/trademark, marketing,

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Application for NumFOCUS affiliation of SageMath

On Tuesday, March 5, 2024 at 2:08:07 PM UTC-5 William Stein wrote: Hi, Related to NumFOCUS, this new proposal for Jupyter to restructure their relationship with NumFocus is possibly relevant: https://jupyter.org/governance/linux-proposal.html Interesting, and certainly relevant. It's a

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Application for NumFOCUS affiliation of SageMath

Hi, Related to NumFOCUS, this new proposal for Jupyter to restructure their relationship with NumFocus is possibly relevant: https://jupyter.org/governance/linux-proposal.html William On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 12:59 PM Matthias Koeppe wrote: > In case people are interested in a synchronous