On Sun, 18 Sep 2022, 01:44 Kwankyu Lee, wrote:
> On Friday, September 16, 2022 at 6:30:05 PM UTC+9 dim...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I'd rather focus the vote primarily on the move away from trac, ...
>
>
> What would the move mean precisely? As there are two things to be done
>
> (1) The release
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/wiki/migration-from-trac-to-Git**b#proposed-workflow-on-github-with-transition-guide-from-trac
Writing this guide was motivated by
- the proposed migration from Trac to GitHub
(https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30363),
but independent from that, the transition
On Sunday, September 18, 2022 at 11:12:59 AM UTC-7 wst...@gmail.com wrote:
> In my experience, the search built into GitHub is at least 10x (or
> maybe 100x?) faster than our trac search, e.g., try searching
> https://trac.sagemath.org/search versus
> https://github.com/python/cpython/issues .
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 10:27 AM Matthias Koeppe
wrote:
>
> On Sunday, September 18, 2022 at 10:14:26 AM UTC-7 Nils Bruin wrote:
>>
>> On Saturday, 17 September 2022 at 17:55:10 UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> The conversion of the Trac tickets to GitHub Issues/PRs only works in one
>>>
On Sunday, September 18, 2022 at 11:12:59 AM UTC-7 wst...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> This is a 3 minute video demoing importing github repos to gitlab,
> which emphasizes answers to a lot of natural frequent questions
> (involving users, issue comments, labels, etc.):
>
>
typo: I have migrated the list of external packages *from*
https://wiki.sagemath.org/SageMathExternalPackages to
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31164
On Sunday, September 18, 2022 at 11:07:28 AM UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> An update:
>
> I have migrated the list of external packages to
On Sunday, September 18, 2022 at 10:14:26 AM UTC-7 Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Saturday, 17 September 2022 at 17:55:10 UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
>>
>> The conversion of the Trac tickets to GitHub Issues/PRs only works in one
>> shot. Incrementally syncing updates from Trac to existing issues is
An update:
I have migrated the list of external packages to
https://wiki.sagemath.org/SageMathExternalPackages to the
ticket https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31164; in the process of this, I
have (superficially) reviewed most of the entries and split them between
pip-installable /
On Saturday, September 17, 2022 at 5:22:06 AM UTC-7 kcrisman wrote:
> On a separate note, can someone explain to me why GL is preferable to
>> those who prefer as open of tools as possible to GH? At first I was under
>> the impression that GL was not a business and was largely self-hosted, but
On Saturday, 17 September 2022 at 17:55:10 UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
> The conversion of the Trac tickets to GitHub Issues/PRs only works in one
> shot. Incrementally syncing updates from Trac to existing issues is not
> possible.
>
Migration *to* GH is one thing, but as has been pointed
Another way that trac is searchable is via the Google group sage-trac. Can
we set up a similar group if we move to Github?
On Sunday, September 18, 2022 at 10:14:26 AM UTC-7 Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Saturday, 17 September 2022 at 17:55:10 UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
>>
>> The conversion of the
William, this is exactly why I search in the sage-trac Google group rather
than on the trac website. The sage-trac group is also good for browsing to
see recent activity.
On Sunday, September 18, 2022 at 11:12:59 AM UTC-7 wst...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 10:27 AM Matthias
On Sunday, September 18, 2022 at 2:55:34 PM UTC-7 dim...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 18 Sep 2022, 22:44 John H Palmieri, wrote:
>
>> William, this is exactly why I search in the sage-trac Google group
>> rather than on the trac website.
>
>
> it's looks easy to set up posting of
On Sun, 18 Sep 2022, 22:44 John H Palmieri, wrote:
> William, this is exactly why I search in the sage-trac Google group rather
> than on the trac website.
it's looks easy to set up posting of issues/comments to a google group.
The sage-trac group is also good for browsing to see recent
14 matches
Mail list logo
