[sage-devel] Re: Current Maxima version

2017-05-31 Thread Robert Dodier
On 2017-01-18, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > ticket upgrading Maxima tp 5.39.0 is ready for review > now: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18920 I'm pleased to say that Maxima 5.40.0 has been released. As usual there will be a process of making packages and minor fixes until it

[sage-devel] Re: transferring sagetex github repo to sagemath?

2017-05-31 Thread Dan Drake
I got Dima's invitation and transferred the repository. Enjoy! On Tuesday, May 30, 2017 at 10:23:06 PM UTC-5, Dan Drake wrote: > > Hello, > > Frédéric Chapoton wrote me asking if I could transfer the sagetex github > repo to the sagemath group. I can do that, but github requires me to have >

[sage-devel] Sage Python 3 proposal

2017-05-31 Thread John H Palmieri
I have a proposal for making the transition to use Sage with Python 3. See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23119 for details (and a branch which works, at least in my limited testing). The proposal: - Have a new command "sage3" which runs Sage using Python 3. - If you build Sage with the

[sage-devel] Re: transferring sagetex github repo to sagemath?

2017-05-31 Thread Dima Pasechnik
Hi Dan, "You've invited Dan Drake to Sage Mathematical Software System! They'll be receiving an email shortly. They can also visit https://github.com/sagemath to accept the invitation." this way we can do the repo transfer. Thanks, Dima PS. Your mail bounces, so I post here just in case. On

Re: [sage-devel] transferring sagetex github repo to sagemath?

2017-05-31 Thread William Stein
Dima -- you're promoted to an owner. Please do useful stuff. Thanks!! https://github.com/orgs/sagemath/people On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > perhaps you can add me to this group and remove Keshav, who is not > contributing since the past 3 or

Re: [sage-devel] transferring sagetex github repo to sagemath?

2017-05-31 Thread Dima Pasechnik
perhaps you can add me to this group and remove Keshav, who is not contributing since the past 3 or more years. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[sage-devel] Re: Refactoring SBox Code

2017-05-31 Thread Friedrich Wiemer
Martin Albrecht reviewed the code (https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22986#comment:5) and asked whether the SBox class should be available in the global namespace. I don't have a opinion here, so I can just remove that import, or does someone think it should be available? Am Mittwoch, 10. Mai

Re: [sage-devel] transferring sagetex github repo to sagemath?

2017-05-31 Thread William Stein
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 9:53 AM, kcrisman wrote: > > > On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 11:49:33 AM UTC-4, William wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:35 PM, Frédéric Chapoton >> wrote: >> > The correct Dan Drake is the owner of >> > >> >

[sage-devel] Re: Brainstorming about Sage dependencies from system packages

2017-05-31 Thread David Leach
Hi, A lot of issues here, but can I suggest maybe you take a look at using the Guix functional package manager as a way of keeping track of your dependency tree and for example using different versions of python concurrently etc. It just might be a great help in development with a lot

Re: [sage-devel] transferring sagetex github repo to sagemath?

2017-05-31 Thread kcrisman
On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 11:49:33 AM UTC-4, William wrote: > > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:35 PM, Frédéric Chapoton > wrote: > > The correct Dan Drake is the owner of > > > > https://github.com/dandrake/sagetex > > As far as I can tell, that information doesn't

Re: [sage-devel] transferring sagetex github repo to sagemath?

2017-05-31 Thread William Stein
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:35 PM, Frédéric Chapoton wrote: > The correct Dan Drake is the owner of > > https://github.com/dandrake/sagetex As far as I can tell, that information doesn't help... which is definitely a shortcoming of Github. In any case, I (or whoever adds

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Crystals not displaying

2017-05-31 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Update: - Up to trivial comments, the default latex output has not changed since Sage 6.7beta3 (at least). view fails similarly with that version. - A slightly smaller example: sage: t = Partition([1]) sage: G = DiGraph([[t,t]], loops=True) sage: latex(G)

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Crystals not displaying

2017-05-31 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Hi, I am investigating this. Current status: Remember that graphs can be latex rendered in two ways: either by having Sage produce tikz manually (1), or through dot2tex (2). For general graphs, the former is the default. For graphs produced from crystals, the default is to use (2) if

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-packaging] Brainstorming about Sage dependencies from system packages

2017-05-31 Thread Isuru Fernando
Without switching to clang, this will require the dependencies especially the C++ dependencies to be rebuilt with gcc. So, you'll need to make sure the C++ library built with gcc is not selected by sage packages and only the sage built library by using that library. For eg. assume you use gmp from

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-packaging] Brainstorming about Sage dependencies from system packages

2017-05-31 Thread Erik Bray
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:00 PM, kcrisman wrote: > I don't think this proposal would affect things too drastically, but just > remember that ideally a Mac (not just Linux) user can just download source > (or use git to do so), type make, wait a while, and still have a usable >

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: [CoCalc] Re: Crystals not displaying

2017-05-31 Thread Harald Schilly
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > oops, it does work after I install dot2tex by doing > > sage -i dot2tex Well, I can only confirm, that dot2tex is installed on CoCalc... Better error messages and sanity checks FTW :-) -- harald -- You received this

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: Crystals not displaying

2017-05-31 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 7:43:14 AM UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > I can confirm that > B = crystals.Tableaux(['A',2], shape=[2,1]); view(B, tightpage=True) > does not work with the latest Sage beta. > It looks as if some tikz-related stuff in the TeX file header > is messed up. >

Re: [sage-devel] algebraic number package?

2017-05-31 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Monday, May 29, 2017 at 12:03:59 PM UTC+1, Ralf Stephan wrote: > > Yes but if Pynac had such a type, and fast, the operations with any roots > (as parts of expressions) would be much simplified. Relying on > Python/Cython code from the C++ end is always tedious and slow. > I don't know a

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: Crystals not displaying

2017-05-31 Thread Dima Pasechnik
I can confirm that B = crystals.Tableaux(['A',2], shape=[2,1]); view(B, tightpage=True) does not work with the latest Sage beta. It looks as if some tikz-related stuff in the TeX file header is messed up. On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 7:38:29 AM UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > Perhaps SMC

Re: [sage-devel] transferring sagetex github repo to sagemath?

2017-05-31 Thread Frédéric Chapoton
The correct Dan Drake is the owner of https://github.com/dandrake/sagetex Le mercredi 31 mai 2017 05:52:26 UTC+2, William a écrit : > > Is one of these guys you? (see screenshot attached) > > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Dan Drake > wrote: > > Hello, > > > >