See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25837 for discussion about
deprecation. I think the documentation ticket is much smaller in scope and
independent of deprecation.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this
> On 16/08/2018, at 10:04, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> On ticket 25382, https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25382, the following
> questions have been raised:
>
> - Is the old Sage notebook deprecated?
>
> - If not, should it be?
>
> - In any case, the documentation builds with Python 2. It
On ticket 25382, https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25382, the following
questions have been raised:
- Is the old Sage notebook deprecated?
- If not, should it be?
- In any case, the documentation builds with Python 2. It does not build
(because sagenb is not Python 3 compatible) with Python 3.
Eric says
*I'm all for more operators supported by syntax*
This sounds like a terrible idea to me. I assume you
do not endorse ALL operators. Just look at the
machine-level operations available in a typical
CPU. Also look at the kinds of syntax freely invented
by physicists, chemists, and
That looks like a symptom of not installing (or re-installing after an upgrade)
the
xcode command line tools.
François
> On 16/08/2018, at 07:51, Jeremy Martin wrote:
>
> I am trying to install sage 8.3 from source, running MacOS 10.13.6 High
> Sierra. A snippet of the output is below. I'm
Hi,
Various Sage users have reported on that parallelization of tensor field
computations does not work on macOS. The latest report, yesterday on
sagemanifolds.list:
https://sympa.obspm.fr/wws/arc/sagemanifolds.list/2018-08/msg3.html
says that this example notebook
>>> from sage.all import *
>>> exec(preparse(r"""
... a = 2^3
... print a
... """))8>>> a8>>> exit> py$a8
or also:
>>> load("some.sage") #I believe all sage power is available in load() but not
>>> all in exec(preparse()).
segunda-feira, 13 de Agosto de 2018 às 18:07:41 UTC+1, Emmanuel
Thanks, Dima! You nailed my problem. Yes, I did not have “gfortran”.
Sage 8.3 built itself without trouble after I installed gfortran (and ran
"configure" before make)
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinaries#MacOS
Thanks again,
Bernie W.
On Tuesday, August 14, 2018 at 1:10:11 AM
On 2018-08-14 23:43, Erik Bray wrote:
Isn't that just the normal message when running `sage -sh`?
IIRC, I added that text because people were generally quite confused
which kind of commands should be run inside or outside of a Sage shell.
The top-level "make" commands are typically run
> Le 14 août 2018 à 20:37, TB a écrit :
>
> Because float(pi/2) is not exactly pi/2:
>
> sage: n(pi/2 - float(pi/2), 53)
> 0.000
> sage: n(pi/2 - float(pi/2), 54) # also for perc > 54 of course
> 1.11022302462516e-16
and what’s the advantage of numerical_approx(v, digits=10) over
10 matches
Mail list logo
