I will delete any messages to this thread in the next week. I encourage
people who have not yet engaged to think about the issue and see if they
have a compromise to suggest.
David
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 5:24 PM G. M.-S. wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> I would like to ask for a moratorium of at least
Hi all.
I would like to ask for a moratorium of at least 1 month on this
discussion, as it is leading nowhere. As a corollary, no changes on
anything related to it for the time being.
I would also like to ask if anybody could enforce this moratorium.
And in addition I would like to take the
I tried to compute associated_primes and it works, maybe it is related to
the bug.
El miércoles, 31 de mayo de 2023 a las 22:20:43 UTC+2, enriqu...@gmail.com
escribió:
> I guess it can be possible to get a smaller example and it may be possible
> that this code has other problems. My goal is
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 7:33 PM Matthias Koeppe
wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, May 31, 2023 at 11:00:58 AM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 6:23 PM Matthias Koeppe
> wrote:
> > As service for those who are missing the references: [...]
> >
> > - 5-year plan (appeared in
> >
I guess it can be possible to get a smaller example and it may be possible
that this code has other problems. My goal is to compute the Fitting ideals
of the "abelian" Alexander matrix of a finitely presented group. If you
execute and hold the two last paragraphs, for me the execution time of
On Wednesday, May 31, 2023 at 11:00:58 AM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 6:23 PM Matthias Koeppe
wrote:
> As service for those who are missing the references: [...]
>
> - 5-year plan (appeared in
https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/sVeu16vaEqo/m/D4pewORzAQAJ and
On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 12:59:54 PM UTC-7 G. M.-S. wrote:
Dima and Matthias,
I completely agree with Nils.
Could you (both of you) take a short vacation from SageMath, please?
More globally, I propose to stop this discussion completely for a few days.
+100
It's time for this
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 6:23 PM Matthias Koeppe
wrote:
>
> As service for those who are missing the references:
>
> - BFDL = Benevolent Dictator for Life, which was used as the humorous title
> expressing the Python's community's trust in Guido van Rossum's leadership in
> Python development.
As service for those who are missing the references:
- BFDL = Benevolent Dictator for Life, which was used as the humorous title
expressing the Python's community's trust in Guido van Rossum's leadership
in Python development. Dima's use of the phrase "(not so B)FDL" insinuates
that my work on
Anyway, we need you. Both of you.
+1
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on
I wrote that code into the Sage library and it is supposed to be doing
exactly what you proposed (clear denominators and do the computation in the
polynomial ring). It is possible the regression was triggered by an update
to Singular; it would indeed be helpful to identify a minimal example of
Besides, the 2nd option is just some ad hoc hogwash. Or do you propose to
vote on appointing Matthias a (not so B)DFL ?
No. I suggest him to formulate the practice as an objective checklist, so
that voters know that rejecting the 1st option would not mean appointing
DFL.
--
You received
On Wed, 31 May 2023, 08:12 Kwankyu Lee, wrote:
> I think the voting should be about the policy about when to drop old
> python from sage support. There should be two candidates
>
> Candidate T: Tobias' proposal to adopt NEP 29. Tobias may summarize the
> content of NEP 29.
> Candidate M:
I think the voting should be about the policy about when to drop old python
from sage support. There should be two candidates
Candidate T: Tobias' proposal to adopt NEP 29. Tobias may summarize the
content of NEP 29.
Candidate M: Matthias' current practice. But this practice should be
14 matches
Mail list logo
