This is about a recent (2018?) generalisation of oriented matroids. Do we have
anything about the usual oriented matroids?
On 22 November 2023 04:25:34 GMT, 'Travis Scrimshaw' via sage-devel
wrote:
>Hi John,
> None of the above. I think maintaining good programming practices is
>important
Hi John,
None of the above. I think maintaining good programming practices is
important for the codebase and it is a good thing to teach contributors who
might not understand. Hence, we should spend the time having them get it
into a format that is acceptable for Sage. In the end, it should
This post concerns https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36492. The main
topic of that PR is matroids about which I know almost nothing, so I am not
the right person to review it. The structure of the PR perhaps opens up
broader questions. The author has some new code, along with a PDF
I encountered an issue which can be easily solved interactively but it may
give problems inside code:
sage: F = CyclotomicField(4, 'b')
sage: R = PolynomialRing(F, 'x, b')
sage: u, v = R.gens()
sage: f = v^2 - u
sage: f0 = f.subs({u:1})
sage: f1 = F[v](f0)
Related to this, I discovered
Hi there,
A few words to say that conda/mamba method was working nicely and give me
a working sage on each machines.
Now I will look on a possible way (if any) to bypass the 'conda activate
sage ' and make this version available from anywhere.
Best regards,
Laurent
Le mercredi 8 novembre
