Re: [sage-devel] Does anyone use SAGE64?

2017-09-05 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2017-09-04 23:37, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) wrote: removing it would make a 64-bit Solaris port more work. I disagree here. It is very likely that fixes are needed anyway to port Sage to 64-bit Solaris. So if things need to be fixed, we should think of the best way to fix

Re: [sage-devel] Does anyone use SAGE64?

2017-09-05 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2017-09-04 19:34, Erik Bray wrote: +1 I think if this functionality is needed for Solaris (or any other platform) it should be moved into configure.ac, and the explicit environment variables done away with. Totally agreed! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: [sage-devel] Does anyone use SAGE64?

2017-09-04 Thread Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd)
On 4 September 2017 at 18:34, Erik Bray wrote: > On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Jean-Pierre Flori > wrote: > +1 I think if this functionality is needed for Solaris (or any other > platform) it should be moved into configure.ac, and the explicit >

Re: [sage-devel] Does anyone use SAGE64?

2017-09-04 Thread Erik Bray
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > > On Monday, September 4, 2017 at 6:06:35 PM UTC+2, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: >> >> I would also say that passing -m64 is needed on Solaris even when the >> kernel is 64bits, and I think the situation is the same on

Re: [sage-devel] Does anyone use SAGE64?

2017-09-04 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
On Monday, September 4, 2017 at 6:06:35 PM UTC+2, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > I would also say that passing -m64 is needed on Solaris even when the > kernel is 64bits, and I think the situation is the same on linux running on > sparc. > On these platforms default versions of gcc produces 32

Re: [sage-devel] Does anyone use SAGE64?

2017-09-04 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
I would also say that passing -m64 is needed on Solaris even when the kernel is 64bits, and I think the situation is the same on linux running on sparc. On these platforms default versions of gcc produces 32 bits stuff by default, unless you begin compiling your own gcc and convince it to do

Re: [sage-devel] Does anyone use SAGE64?

2017-09-02 Thread Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd)
On 2 September 2017 at 21:59, John H Palmieri wrote: > > I don't know if Sage works on Solaris right now, but if it does, does it > build gcc (as it does on OS X), or does it use a preexisting compiler? > I would be surprised if Sage did build on Solaris now, as I would

Re: [sage-devel] Does anyone use SAGE64?

2017-09-02 Thread John H Palmieri
On Saturday, September 2, 2017 at 11:54:00 AM UTC-7, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) wrote: > > On 2 September 2017 at 01:41, John H Palmieri > wrote: > >> >> >> Hi Dave, >> >> Can you clarify? You say that the are necessary on Solaris, but is that >> recent

Re: [sage-devel] Does anyone use SAGE64?

2017-09-02 Thread Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd)
On 2 September 2017 at 01:41, John H Palmieri wrote: > > > Hi Dave, > > Can you clarify? You say that the are necessary on Solaris, but is that > recent information? It is possible that newer versions of Sage and/or > Solaris might make SAGE64 unnecessary. > > Regards, >

Re: [sage-devel] Does anyone use SAGE64?

2017-09-02 Thread Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd)
On 2 Sep 2017 01:41, "John H Palmieri" wrote: > Hi Dave, > > Can you clarify? You say that the are necessary on Solaris, but is that recent information? It is possible that newer versions of Sage and/or Solaris might make SAGE64 unnecessary. > > Regards, > John Hi John,

Re: [sage-devel] Does anyone use SAGE64?

2017-09-01 Thread John H Palmieri
On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 3:47:28 PM UTC-7, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) wrote: > > > On 1 Sep 2017 23:21, "John H Palmieri" > wrote: > > > > Does anyone use the environment variables SAGE64 of CFLAG64? At > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23733, it is

Re: [sage-devel] Does anyone use SAGE64?

2017-09-01 Thread François Bissey
> On 2/09/2017, at 11:27, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) > wrote: > > I could have swore that it was used on at least same versions of OSX. I would > need to look at the Sage source code, but am in bed using my mobile phone, > that will have to wait

Re: [sage-devel] Does anyone use SAGE64?

2017-09-01 Thread Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd)
On 1 Sep 2017 23:54, "François Bissey" wrote: > > > > On 2/09/2017, at 10:47, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) < drkir...@kirkbymicrowave.co.uk> wrote: > > > > > > On 1 Sep 2017 23:21, "John H Palmieri" wrote: > > > > > > Does anyone use the

Re: [sage-devel] Does anyone use SAGE64?

2017-09-01 Thread François Bissey
> On 2/09/2017, at 10:47, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) > wrote: > > > On 1 Sep 2017 23:21, "John H Palmieri" wrote: > > > > Does anyone use the environment variables SAGE64 of CFLAG64? At > >

Re: [sage-devel] Does anyone use SAGE64?

2017-09-01 Thread Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd)
On 1 Sep 2017 23:21, "John H Palmieri" wrote: > > Does anyone use the environment variables SAGE64 of CFLAG64? At https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23733, it is suggested that they be deprecated and then removed. Any comments? > > -- > John They are necessary if one

[sage-devel] Does anyone use SAGE64?

2017-09-01 Thread John H Palmieri
Does anyone use the environment variables SAGE64 of CFLAG64? At https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23733, it is suggested that they be deprecated and then removed. Any comments? -- John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To