On 2017-09-04 23:37, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) wrote:
removing it would make a 64-bit Solaris port more work.
I disagree here. It is very likely that fixes are needed anyway to port
Sage to 64-bit Solaris. So if things need to be fixed, we should think
of the best way to fix
On 2017-09-04 19:34, Erik Bray wrote:
+1 I think if this functionality is needed for Solaris (or any other
platform) it should be moved into configure.ac, and the explicit
environment variables done away with.
Totally agreed!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
On 4 September 2017 at 18:34, Erik Bray wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Jean-Pierre Flori
> wrote:
> +1 I think if this functionality is needed for Solaris (or any other
> platform) it should be moved into configure.ac, and the explicit
>
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, September 4, 2017 at 6:06:35 PM UTC+2, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>>
>> I would also say that passing -m64 is needed on Solaris even when the
>> kernel is 64bits, and I think the situation is the same on
On Monday, September 4, 2017 at 6:06:35 PM UTC+2, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>
> I would also say that passing -m64 is needed on Solaris even when the
> kernel is 64bits, and I think the situation is the same on linux running on
> sparc.
> On these platforms default versions of gcc produces 32
I would also say that passing -m64 is needed on Solaris even when the
kernel is 64bits, and I think the situation is the same on linux running on
sparc.
On these platforms default versions of gcc produces 32 bits stuff by
default, unless you begin compiling your own gcc and convince it to do
On 2 September 2017 at 21:59, John H Palmieri
wrote:
>
> I don't know if Sage works on Solaris right now, but if it does, does it
> build gcc (as it does on OS X), or does it use a preexisting compiler?
>
I would be surprised if Sage did build on Solaris now, as I would
On Saturday, September 2, 2017 at 11:54:00 AM UTC-7, Dr. David Kirkby
(Kirkby Microwave Ltd) wrote:
>
> On 2 September 2017 at 01:41, John H Palmieri > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> Can you clarify? You say that the are necessary on Solaris, but is that
>> recent
On 2 September 2017 at 01:41, John H Palmieri
wrote:
>
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> Can you clarify? You say that the are necessary on Solaris, but is that
> recent information? It is possible that newer versions of Sage and/or
> Solaris might make SAGE64 unnecessary.
>
> Regards,
>
On 2 Sep 2017 01:41, "John H Palmieri" wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Can you clarify? You say that the are necessary on Solaris, but is that
recent information? It is possible that newer versions of Sage and/or
Solaris might make SAGE64 unnecessary.
>
> Regards,
> John
Hi John,
On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 3:47:28 PM UTC-7, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby
Microwave Ltd) wrote:
>
>
> On 1 Sep 2017 23:21, "John H Palmieri"
> wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone use the environment variables SAGE64 of CFLAG64? At
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23733, it is
> On 2/09/2017, at 11:27, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd)
> wrote:
>
> I could have swore that it was used on at least same versions of OSX. I would
> need to look at the Sage source code, but am in bed using my mobile phone,
> that will have to wait
On 1 Sep 2017 23:54, "François Bissey" wrote:
>
>
> > On 2/09/2017, at 10:47, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) <
drkir...@kirkbymicrowave.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 1 Sep 2017 23:21, "John H Palmieri" wrote:
> > >
> > > Does anyone use the
> On 2/09/2017, at 10:47, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd)
> wrote:
>
>
> On 1 Sep 2017 23:21, "John H Palmieri" wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone use the environment variables SAGE64 of CFLAG64? At
> >
On 1 Sep 2017 23:21, "John H Palmieri" wrote:
>
> Does anyone use the environment variables SAGE64 of CFLAG64? At
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23733, it is suggested that they be
deprecated and then removed. Any comments?
>
> --
> John
They are necessary if one
Does anyone use the environment variables SAGE64 of CFLAG64? At
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23733, it is suggested that they be
deprecated and then removed. Any comments?
--
John
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To
16 matches
Mail list logo