Re: [sage-devel] Re: Application for NumFOCUS affiliation of SageMath

Thanks a lot, William. I've submitted our application to NumFOCUS today to meet the Apr 15 deadline. I'll keep everyone posted as soon as I hear anything back. On Sunday, March 10, 2024 at 9:05:36 AM UTC-7 William Stein wrote: > Hi, > > I also strongly support this initiative for Sage to join

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Application for NumFOCUS affiliation of SageMath

Hi, I also strongly support this initiative for Sage to join NumFocus at this point in time. Regarding Cython, I made up the name in maybe 2008, and started it as a project by combining "Pyrex" that Greg Ewing worked on periodically, my own fork of Pyrex that had features I added that were

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Application for NumFOCUS affiliation of SageMath

I support Matthias' initiative to join NumFocus. Looking at the application , there are only a few todo items: * Describe the shared history with Cython and IPython. This doesn't need to be extensive, but would be useful. * If we update the code of

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Application for NumFOCUS affiliation of SageMath

I don't think one needs to read between the lines. Per https://jupyter.org/governance/linux-proposal.html#project-jupyter-s-needs it's about funding goals in the $1-$2 million range + permanent staffing + support for "operating" (which is described there as "legal/trademark, marketing,

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Application for NumFOCUS affiliation of SageMath

On Tuesday, March 5, 2024 at 2:08:07 PM UTC-5 William Stein wrote: Hi, Related to NumFOCUS, this new proposal for Jupyter to restructure their relationship with NumFocus is possibly relevant: https://jupyter.org/governance/linux-proposal.html Interesting, and certainly relevant. It's a

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Application for NumFOCUS affiliation of SageMath

Hi, Related to NumFOCUS, this new proposal for Jupyter to restructure their relationship with NumFocus is possibly relevant: https://jupyter.org/governance/linux-proposal.html William On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 12:59 PM Matthias Koeppe wrote: > In case people are interested in a synchronous

[sage-devel] Re: Application for NumFOCUS affiliation of SageMath

In case people are interested in a synchronous discussion of this topic, here's a poll to find suitable meeting times Feb 1–4. https://whenisgood.net/sage-numfocus On Monday, January 15, 2024 at 11:42:10 PM UTC-8 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > As I have not received sufficient feedback by today,

[sage-devel] Re: Application for NumFOCUS affiliation of SageMath

Yes, please, post your comments here. On Wednesday, January 17, 2024 at 7:31:28 AM UTC-8 Trevor Karn wrote: > Will this thread be used for discussion prior to the April 15 deadline? > > On Monday, January 15, 2024 at 11:42:10 PM UTC-8 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > >> As I have not received sufficient

[sage-devel] Re: Application for NumFOCUS affiliation of SageMath

Will this thread be used for discussion prior to the April 15 deadline? On Monday, January 15, 2024 at 11:42:10 PM UTC-8 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > As I have not received sufficient feedback by today, I'll retarget to the > next deadline, Apr 15. > Comments and discussion please by January 31. >

[sage-devel] Re: Application for NumFOCUS affiliation of SageMath

As I have not received sufficient feedback by today, I'll retarget to the next deadline, Apr 15. Comments and discussion please by January 31. On Saturday, January 13, 2024 at 5:55:29 PM UTC-8 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > Over the years, it has been suggested that our project seek affiliation >

[sage-devel] Re: Application for NumFOCUS affiliation of SageMath

To add more details on the history of the (non) application, during OpenDreamKit years, and after, the intention was to use a to be established European branch of NumFocus, hence the endless delays The branch didn't get established, as far as I know. Dima On Sunday, January 14, 2024 at 1:55:29