Hackenberg
>
> --
> Klaus Hackenberg
> IT-Systeme und Software-Integration
> IT.SERVICES
> Ruhr-Universität Bochum | 44780 Bochum
> fon: +49 234 32 23485
> http://www.it-services.rub.de/
>
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: sage-support@googlegroups.com
> Ruhr-Universität Bochum | 44780 Bochum
> fon: +49 234 32 23485
> http://www.it-services.rub.de/
>
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: sage-support@googlegroups.com Im Auftrag
> von Dima Pasechnik
> Gesendet: Freitag, 5. März 2021 11:31
> An: sage-support
&
Regards, Klaus Hackenberg
>
> --
> Klaus Hackenberg
> IT-Systeme und Software-Integration
> IT.SERVICES
> Ruhr-Universität Bochum | 44780 Bochum
> fon: +49 234 32 23485
> http://www.it-services.rub.de/
>
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: sage-support@google
secondary error, in processing ValueError thrown by
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/blob/master/build/sage_bootstrap/uncompress/cmdline.py#L53
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday, March 4, 2021 at 9:53:28 AM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 5:08 PM 'Hac
IT.SERVICES
>
> Ruhr-Universität Bochum | 44780 Bochum
>
> fon: +49 234 32 23485
>
> http://www.it-services.rub.de/
>
>
>
> Von: sage-support@googlegroups.com Im Auftrag
> von Dima Pasechnik
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. März 2021 17:18
> An: sage-support
>
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 3:23 PM 'Akshat Agrawal' via sage-support
wrote:
>
> Thanks for the help. I searched for bzip2 and libpng packages on Anaconda
> Cloud and installed them. It is no more installing Python-3.8.5
>
> Although, now I am stuck at some other part. XD.
look at the last lines of
iled !
>
> But now I get a new error with symmetrica-3.0.1.
> I attach the error log file
>
> Regards, Klaus Hackenberg
>
> --
> Klaus Hackenberg
> IT-Systeme und Software-Integration
> IT.SERVICES
> Ruhr-Universität Bochum | 44780 Bochum
> fon: +49 234 32 23485
tion
> IT.SERVICES
> Ruhr-Universität Bochum | 44780 Bochum
> fon: +49 234 32 23485
> http://www.it-services.rub.de/
>
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: sage-support@googlegroups.com Im Auftrag
> von Dima Pasechnik
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 18:28
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 2:16 PM 'Akshat Agrawal' via sage-support
wrote:
>
> After reading the "configure" file in SAGE_ROOT directory, I found that due
> to some packages, Python3 is installing again.
>
> Here I am stating that specific code:
>
> ```{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 11:18 AM 'Akshat Agrawal' via sage-support
wrote:
>
> Well, I was simply using the command "make". It started to install python
> itself. I already have Python-3.8.5 installed in my Anaconda Environment. Can
> you please tell me how should I skip this python installation?
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021, 22:05 'Akshat Agrawal' via sage-support, <
sage-support@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I am trying to set up Sage-9.2 on by Ubuntu 18.04 on Anaconda. But I am
> stuck at a point.
> Please find attached the error log file.
>
> It will be very helpful if I can get a
On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 5:15 PM 'Klaus Hackenberg' via sage-support
wrote:
>
> High,
> I tried to compile sage 9.2 on a server running RHEL 6.
> I use gcc 9.2.0 to compile and the following commands
>
> ./configure --with-gmp=gmp
might be in error.
What did you mean to achieve by '--with-gmp=gmp'
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 11:10 AM Emmanuel Charpentier
wrote:
>
> In 9.2.beta7, (our port of) Maxima seems to have an nice bug : inability to
> evaluate (some) symbolic sums. Minimal illustration :
>
> ```
> ;;; Loading #P"/usr/local/sage-9/local/lib/ecl/sb-bsd-sockets.fas"
> ;;; Loading
The union will in general be non-convex, and Sage doesn't handle
non-convex polyhedra.
The best you can hope for is to construct the convex closure.
E.g. for polytopes (specified by vertices) just take the polytope spanned by the
union of the vertices.
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 11:39 AM Zhaiyu
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 9:33 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> You can just ignore "git trac" extension and use plain git.
> I think of "git trac" as more of the release manager tool than anything else.
e.g. in this case you could have done
git fetch origin u/yzh/hybrid_
You can just ignore "git trac" extension and use plain git.
I think of "git trac" as more of the release manager tool than anything
else.
Anyhow, it could be that a python2 you have installed in ~/. local causes
these issues.
I would have python3 installed in your WSL and just used it.
On Tue,
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:44 AM Peter Luschny wrote:
>
> The compositional inverse (with respect to x) of
>
> y(t, x) = x - t*(exp(x) - 1)
>
> is
>
> 1/(1-t)*y + t/(1-t)^3*y^2/2! + (t+2*t^2)/(1-t)^5*y^3/3! +
> (t+8*t^2+6*t^3)/(1-t)^7*y^4/4! + ...
>
> Apparently multivariate power series
This has to be reported to Arch people.
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 1:39 PM Simone Perriello wrote:
>
>
> Operating system: ArchLinux.
> Sage installed through official packages.
> If I just launch `sage` from terminal it gives this stacktrace
> https://pastebin.com/s1FnMhe2
>
> The same happens if
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 10:22 AM Derick Swodnick wrote:
>
> Hello! I am trying to build from Sage source code in Ubuntu, but
> unfortunately I get this error.
>
>
> [..]
> rm -f config.log
> mkdir -p logs/pkgs
> ln -s
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 6:36 AM dan hayes wrote:
>
> i have heard running in WSL are slower and extra delays compared to other
> possibilities. If nothing else and i ended up buying one of those advertised
> "Xtra-PC" usb's already with linux is it easy to insall sagemath on one of
> those ?
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 3:27 PM dan hayes wrote:
>
> what is all this talk about download binaries, usb key, iso and all that ?
> what do i need to make a bootable usb with linux and sage complete and
> NOTHIng else. what is the difference between binaries , key, iso and usb key
> why do u not
You might try
https://github.com/3-manifolds/fix_mac_sage/
Having said that,Sage 9.2 was released before macOS 11.1, so your
mileage may vary.
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 12:12 PM Ishai Dan-Cohen wrote:
>
> I'm trying to run Sage on my MacBook Air running macOS Big Sur 11.1. I
> downloaded the dmg
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 10:21 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:33 AM Vincent Delecroix
> <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I would say, better to avoid it. That is a personal comment.
> >
> > Vincent
> >
> > Le 2
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:33 AM Vincent Delecroix
<20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I would say, better to avoid it. That is a personal comment.
>
> Vincent
>
> Le 27/01/2021 à 18:48, G. M.-S. a écrit :
> > So if I understand you well, "x in P" should not be used for serious work?
> >
> >
I don't think our present binary installs work well on macOS 11.
(although conda installs might just work, I need to check)
Building from source might be the only option at the moment.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 9:02 AM Pol del Aguila Pla wrote:
>
> Dear developers of SageMath,
>
> I keep
at the bottom of the log you see
ImportError:
/home/mathieu/opt/SageMath/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/sage/matrix/matrix_modn_sparse.cpython-38-x86_64-linux-gnu.so:
undefined symbol:
_ZNK6Givaro7IntegercvNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEEB5cxx11Ev
which is an indication
Could it be due to gcc-10?
I am not sure whether 9.2 was well-tested with gcc-10.
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021, 18:29 David Valdez, wrote:
> While building Sage 9.2 from source, the `make` process throws an error
> while building the "fpylll.config" extension. I believe the most relevant
> log
On Wed, 23 Dec 2020, 14:11 Mouse Mousevich, wrote:
> I looked into build/pgks/* (1.5 GB) and it appears that Sage is trying to
> be a package manager, in addition to what people probably want it for.
>
> I guess at version 9.2 it's rather late to ask why it isn't good enough to
> just list in
On Wed, 23 Dec 2020, 11:01 Mouse Mousevich, wrote:
> Please see below.
>
> TL;DR.
>> patches are most welcome :-)
>>
>
> Understood.
>
>
>> Sage-9.2 has several idiosyncrasies that for me are hard to explain. One
>>> - it deliberately refuses to work with Macports-installed packages, even
>>>
TL;DR.
patches are most welcome :-)
Details below.
On Wed, 23 Dec 2020, 02:40 Mouse Mousevich, wrote:
> A lot of people have a lot of problems with Sage-9.2 on MacOS, installing
> pre-compiled or building from the source.
>
> Sage-9.2 has several idiosyncrasies that for me are hard to explain.
On Fri, 18 Dec 2020, 18:27 Isuru Fernando, wrote:
> miniforge, a conda installer by conda-forge works fine on Apple silicon
> chips with native binaries. You can install python 3.8 and 3.9.
> packages like python, numpy, scipy, notebook, scikit-image are known to
> work.
>
> See
On Fri, 18 Dec 2020, 20:41 William Stein, wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 11:26 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> > > It is of course impossible to build or install anything with this
> > > binary. Why do we not ship openssl as part of the binary (the license
> > >
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 6:14 PM William Stein wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> There is a thread [1] on sage-support about using Sage on the new
> Apple M1 ARM 64-bit based laptops. I have one of these, so I decided
> to investigate, since this M1 processor is very, very impressive
> regarding the compute
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 3:19 PM Thomas Judson wrote:
>
> I have a new MacBook Air with an Apple M1 chip. Does the Intel version of
> Sage 9.2 work on this machine?
9.2 is not known to work on macOS 11 (the one you have on M1), as far as I know.
You might try building the latest beta in
Probably the most beginner-friendy way on macOS is to use Conda:
https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/installation/conda.html
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 12:02 PM Jorge J. Urroz wrote:
>
> I am trying to install Sage 9.2 in Mac book pro, with Catalina. I downloaded
> the sage.app, and when i try to
upgrading the python on which sage is built definitely needs a rebuild of
all python/cython modules.
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020, 08:52 Emmanuel Charpentier, <
emanuel.charpent...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Setup :
>
> - Debian testing, amd64, 16 GB RAM
>
> - Sage 9.3.beta2 compiled from `develop` git branch,
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 3:26 PM Mathieu Dutour wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 3 December 2020 at 19:13:28 UTC+1 dim...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 5:39 PM Mathieu Dutour wrote:
>>>
>>> Thank you for providing this. Keep that in mind for future.
>>>
>>> As it turns out, the solution to
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 5:39 PM Mathieu Dutour wrote:
>
> Thank you for providing this. Keep that in mind for future.
>
> As it turns out, the solution to installing was incredibly simple:
> "brew install sage"
>
dima@oucl13243 sage % brew install sage
==> Searching for similarly named
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 5:39 PM Mathieu Dutour
wrote:
> Thank you for providing this. Keep that in mind for future.
>
> As it turns out, the solution to installing was incredibly simple:
> "brew install sage"
>
on macOS 10.15.7 this appears to install the version 9.2 of x86_64.app.dmg
by
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 7:57 PM Mathieu Dutour wrote:
>>
>> Building binary installers on macOS has become a dark art, we don't
>> have people who
>> master it well any more :-(
>
> What a pity. What are the scripts for the creation of the binaries?
> Maybe that can be addressed easily.
The
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 7:10 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 6:54 PM Mathieu Dutour
> wrote:
> >
> > I would like to install SAGE on a macOS MacBook Pro16 computer.
>
> Building binary installers on macOS has become a dar
Hi Mathieu,
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 6:54 PM Mathieu Dutour wrote:
>
> I would like to install SAGE on a macOS MacBook Pro16 computer.
Building binary installers on macOS has become a dark art, we don't
have people who
master it well any more :-(
The quickest way is to use Conda.
we should get opensuse tumbleweed properly supported, with CI.
this entails listing the needed packages in build/pkgs/*/distros/
like we do for Ubuntu, Fedora, etc.
Fedora would be close match, but not 100% it seems.
(currently trying to build in an lxc container)
On Mon, 30 Nov 2020, 15:36
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 9:16 AM Vincent Delecroix
<20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Le 30/11/2020 à 00:48, slelievre a écrit :
> > 2020-11-29 21:23:36 UTC, Guillermo:
> >>
> >> I wonder what would be wrong with replacing '!' → '.factorial()'
> >
> > Interesting idea. Just be careful with `!=`
If your Sage build is incomplete, some packages have been built, say,
pari, and then you decide to replace pari
with a system package then you need to uninstall it.
In your config.log there is
configure:38410: result: pari-2.11.4.p0:
already installed as an SPKG
e.g. for pari you'd need to run
On Sat, 28 Nov 2020, 19:41 Tobias Weiss, wrote:
> I understand: I start a new compilation with "make giac && make". It
> starts with readline and does pari now very early.
>
no, not a new one.
Normally one can (and should) proceed at the point it stopped.
> Tobias Weiss schrieb am Samstag,
please post the top-level config.log
On Sat, 28 Nov 2020, 17:32 Tobias Weiss, wrote:
> Because the last g++ command is something with stl vector: Do I need the
> glibc-static-devel? I only have glibc-devel installed.
>
> Tobias
>
>
> Tobias Weiss schrieb am Samstag, 28. November 2020 um
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 9:36 PM Tobias Weiss wrote:
>
> I still have a question: Keeping in mind Tumbleweed is a rolling release of
> Opensuse - is it clever to build a fixed binary? Will this binary persist
> with the rolling software updates?
we regularly test SageMath on Gentoo, which is a
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 7:21 PM Tobias Weiss wrote:
>
> ... I thought there must be a reason I can install the development package
> without binary package. But no it makes no sense to me. Can this be the
> reason of both complile errors?
>
> Tobias
>
> Tobias Weiss schrieb am Freitag, 27.
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 5:44 PM Tobias Weiss wrote:
>
> OK! I just uninstalled flint and did configure without system packages again
> (after make clean). I can tell you if it works tomorrow or later, because of
> compile time ...
>
> Well, I first tried to compile with system packages, but
On Fri, 27 Nov 2020, 14:21 Tobias, wrote:
> Hallo Everybody,
>
> on OpenSuse Tumbleweed I try building sage 9.2 without most of packages
> from
> system. The make command stopped compiling pynac because "the programm
> needs
> libflint", but flint was already compiled by make command.
>
>
>
>
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 9:00 PM John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> Is it possible to create a binary distribution that relies on a system Python
> 3? Those may already be built with ssl support.
On macOS? Not really. But one can mimic what cpython is doing in their
Python installer - they have a second
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 2:42 AM Xie wrote:
> Thanks, but jupyterhub does not supoort real-time collaboration now
> though roadmap contains this.
there was no RTC (2+ people working on the same sheet in real time) in
sageNB either, if I recall right.
The jupyter roadmap is via jupyterlab, I
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 2:50 PM Xie wrote:
> Yes. I use *Jupyter* *Notebook* myself. But I need share with other
> people sometimes. And *Jupyter* Notebook* does not* provide a server
> mode to make the others register an account.
what you need is
Hi,
SageMath never supported SageNB on Python3, it did not "drop" such a
support.
SageNB has been *retired *since SageMath stopped supporting Python2 in
version 9.2, and it is high time to switch to
another notebook solution, while converters from SageNB are readily
available.
This should not be a
On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 7:23 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> Download 9.2 and build, please.
>
> (-upgrade option is obsolete, should be removed)
opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30866
to fix this
>
>
> On Fri, 6 Nov 2020, 06:12 Surendran Karippadath,
> wrote:
&
Download 9.2 and build, please.
(-upgrade option is obsolete, should be removed)
On Fri, 6 Nov 2020, 06:12 Surendran Karippadath,
wrote:
> $ sage -upgrade 9.2
>
> must source sage-env-config before sage-env
> Error setting environment variables by sourcing
>
As far as building from source is concerned, I'd recommend using
Homebrew, instead of trying
to build most packages from scratch (as it is the case if you don't use it).
Please pay attention that you need to run
source .homebrew-build-env
and to the list of packages you'd install printed out by
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 11:27 PM Blue diamond <1234blue12345...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> An(t) are defined by the following recurrence: A0(t) = 1 An(t) = t(1 −
> t)A 0 n−1 (t) + An−1(t)(1 + (n − 1))t for n ≥ 1
>
> How would I write this using n eulRec which takes in a number n and uses
> ordinary
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 6:12 PM Carl Eberhart wrote:
>
> I am running Ubuntu Mate 20.04 on a raspberry pi 4, and have installed
> Sagemath 9.0 using the Synaptic package manager. I can open a python3
> notebook, but the sagemath 9.0 kernel refuses to start. Can someone make a
> suggestion?
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 6:36 PM Carl Eberhart wrote:
>
> I can't load a sage file in either the notebook or terminal version of Sage
> Here is my last (of many) attempts.
> sage: load("/home/carl/Notebooks/quadrisection/orthogtraps19.sage")
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>
> File
On Fri, 16 Oct 2020, 22:27 Douglas Hulbert,
wrote:
> Dima and Zachary, thank you for rapid responses.
> Attached is the config.log file, found in the directory
> /Users/douglashulbert/sage-9.1.
> I noticed that there's a gap in the version numbers between my OS version
> and those posted on the
Dear Doug,
your OS and Xcode are much newer than Sage 9.1 - there could be no way
to make sure that they would work together.
You could better try the latest release candidate instead -
http://mirrors.mit.edu/sage/devel/index.html
And yes, the top level config.log would be very helpful.
On Fri,
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 7:02 PM Linden Disney wrote:
>
> Ah ok, it may be the case that working with the R interface and using
> TDAstats (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/TDAstats/index.html) might
> now be the best solution, but I may comment on this again when I have landed
> on what
I would suggest not to touch macOS 11 until it is running Homebrew (or help
them), because they basically have the same issues to solve.
On Wed, 7 Oct 2020, 22:09 John H Palmieri, wrote:
> I think you should report this at #30651, including details of which
> homebrew packages you've
We've recovered the settings for getting DOI for Sage releases via
zenodo, something that was broken for years.
cf https://zenodo.org/record/4066866
and this is DOI for Sage 9.1: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4066866
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
just added some keywords to the subject.
On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 9:15 AM Mattia Villani wrote:
>
> I am trying to calculate the general expression of the Kretschmann scalar of
> metric depending a non specified function m(r): how do I define such a
> function? II have tried with
> def m(r)
>
On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 10:31 AM Mattia Villani wrote:
>
> I have used Sagemath for my work: are there any pubblications I can cite to
> acknowledge sagemath authors?
please see https://wiki.sagemath.org/Publications_using_SageMath
(We should have this in our FAQ too - see
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 1:36 PM Henri Girard wrote:
>
> Now if you build it :)
>
TBF, building Sage on Windows is less than trivial. :-(
> On 29/09/2020 14:27, Fernando Gouvea wrote:
>
> Good news! When is 9.2 expected to be ready?
>
> Fernando
>
> On 9/29/2020 3:54 AM, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
>
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 9:03 PM Fernando Q. Gouvea wrote:
>
> I am trying to see how to do a standard calculus exercise in Sage. I want a
> power series for the integral of sin(x)/x. I tried:
>
> sage: var('t')
> t
> sage: assume(x>0)
> sage: f(x)=integrate(sin(t)/t,t,0,x)
> sage: f
> x |-->
:24 Dima Pasechnik, wrote:
> try upgrading to the latest readline (8.0.4), e.g. install as much as
> possible from Homebrew,
> which has this version working.
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 1:09 PM David Joyner wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 1
try upgrading to the latest readline (8.0.4), e.g. install as much as
possible from Homebrew,
which has this version working.
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 1:09 PM David Joyner wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 6:54 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>> in the log
in the log you attached the failure is in python3, and it's dated Aug 22
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 11:12 AM David Joyner wrote:
>
> I downloaded sage 9.2.b12 then ran configure and make using newly upgraded
> Xcode 12.
> Instead of failing at python it fails at readline. The log is attached.
>
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:24 PM Rachel King wrote:
>
> The textbook for a course I am taking says the following,
> Suppose you have three tests in your linear algebra class and your scores are
> 90, 100, and 98. In the Sage cell below, add your scores together and call
> the result total. On
Thanks, right, I forgot the meaning of "int" in latte_int, sorry.
Indeed, this looks like one can actually do better than Mathematica, if
latte_int is installed.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 2:23 AM slelievre wrote:
>
>
> Le dimanche 13 septembre 2020 12:30:09 UTC+2, Dim
On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 10:03 AM Teodoro Coluccio
wrote:
> Can I perform triple integrals in a region of space I define? I'm trying
> to migrate from mathematica to sage, and in mathematica I could go and
> define a region of space (with various limitations) and then perform the
> integral of a
without errors.
>>
>> Thanks again for all the help!
>>
>> Best,
>> Taj
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 11:45 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>>
>>> it might be quicker to build Sage from source on your system than to try to
>>> fix this.
&
sts passed without errors.
Thanks for letting us know. I must say I don't recall texlive
installing ecl, but perhaps that's what happened in your case.
It would be interesting to know which ubuntu package does this.
>
> Thanks again for all the help!
>
> Best,
> Taj
>
> On Tue,
93
> 94 from .maxima_abstract import (MaximaAbstract,
> MaximaAbstractFunction,
>
> ImportError:
> /home/taj/SageMath/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sage/libs/
> ecl.cpython-37m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so: undefined symbol: cl_env_p
>
>
>
> Best,
> Taj
>
&g
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 8:41 AM Taj Jankovic wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am having trouble with the SageMath.
>
> 1/ I've downloaded the binary tar file sage-9.1-Ubuntu_18.04-x86_64.tar.bz2
> from
> https://www.sagemath.org/download-linux.html
>
> 2/ Then
> tar jxvf
[Technical warning]
Please do not post links with ads here (in particular the sort of ads
that basically obscure the important part - after I opened your link I
thought it's pure spam, for a moment). You can attach images to your
messages, or find a service that does not do this kind of spam, e.g.
On Fri, 4 Sep 2020, 17:31 John H Palmieri, wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, September 4, 2020 at 9:23:30 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 4:31 PM John H Palmieri
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Frid
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 4:31 PM John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, September 4, 2020 at 7:14:24 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 12:55 PM Szabolcs Horvát wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks for the response. I do have b
RINGS_H 1
> | #define HAVE_INTTYPES_H 1
> | #define HAVE_STDINT_H 1
> | #define HAVE_UNISTD_H 1
> | #define HAVE_LIBM 1
> | #define HAVE_CXX11 1
> | #define HAVE_BOOST /**/
> | /* end confdefs.h. */
> | #include
> |
> | int
> | main ()
> | {
> |
> | boost:
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 11:12 AM Szabolcs Horvát wrote:
>
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am trying to compile Sage on macOS 10.14.
>
> The package brial-1.2.5 fails to compile.
>
> The error is:
>
> ../../libbrial/include/polybori/common/traits.h:26:10: fatal error:
> 'boost/preprocessor/cat.hpp' file
Are you talking about SageMath-9.1-Installer-v0.6.0.exe ? Did you
check that you got a complete download
- to do so, you need to verify its MD5, which must
be9560d1f8669e140f2287336384179f ?
To do this, open command prompt, change to the folder where
SageMath-9.1-Installer-v0.6.0.exe is located,
We need more details in order to be able to help you.
What is your OS and hardware? What are you trying to install (send a link
to the installation medium you used) ?
On Mon, 31 Aug 2020, 19:10 Krishna Ghode, wrote:
> I try 3-4 times.
> It starts and after some process it suddenly invisible.
On Mon, 31 Aug 2020, 08:29 Jean-Florent Raymond,
wrote:
> Thanks for reporting this.
> On my machine it works with the version of sage I was using at the
> beginning of summer (version 9.2.beta1, release date: 2020-06-13) but
> fails when I compile the latest version from develop.
> I will
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 10:03 PM pong wrote:
>
> Hi Jean-Florent,
>
> I did exactly just that (see attachment) but it complains about the need
> of at least one requirement to install.
> Please advise.
how about just doing
sage --python setup.py install
in the root directory of phitigra
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 9:24 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 5:50 AM Surendran Karippadath
> wrote:
> > I evaluated the j-invariant in Pari/gp In SageMathCell
> > ? \p 50
> > ? ellj(sqrt(163.0)*I)
> > %1 = 6892589303610927989108563928694
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 5:50 AM Surendran Karippadath
wrote:
> I evaluated the j-invariant in Pari/gp In SageMathCell
> ? \p 50
> ? ellj(sqrt(163.0)*I)
> %1 = 68925893036109279891085639286944512.0163739
Sage has this function too (it calls Pari, so that's not an
independent
I guess it would be Singular, not Pari.
On Fri, 28 Aug 2020, 22:11 Emmanuel Charpentier, <
emanuel.charpent...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Inspiration is this ask.sagemath question
>
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 10:25 PM Nils Bruin wrote:
>
> On Friday, August 28, 2020 at 10:36:20 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>> technically, money goes to a registered charity Open Collective, which takes
>> a 10% cut for admin etc costs (and Stripe takes a cut, too
were clearer where the money went. Is it the intention that this money goes
> to the Sage Foundation (at least that's a registered charity somewhere, so
> it has some fiscal oversight)?
>
> On Friday, August 28, 2020 at 8:41:16 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>> Pleas
Please share widely - one can now sponsor SageMath via GitHub "Sponsor"
button on https://github.com/sagemath
(see also https://github.com/sponsors/sagemath for details - and let me
know whether it should be improved/changed)
-- Forwarded message -
From: GitHub
Date: Fri, Aug 28,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 4:45 PM pong wrote:
>
> Running sagemath 9.1 from a jupyter notebook
>
> When calling graph_editor() got the following error message.
> How can I make the module 'sagenb' works again?
>
sagenb does not work with Python 3. You'd need Sage 9.1 (or earlier) built
with
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 11:23 PM David Joyner wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 6:02 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 10:51 PM David Joyner wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 4:52 PM Dima P
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 10:51 PM David Joyner wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 4:52 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 8:28 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>> >
>> > note: 'utimensat' has been marked as being introduced in macOS
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 8:28 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> note: 'utimensat' has been marked as being introduced in macOS 10.13
> here, but the deployment target is macOS 10.9.0
>
> seems to indicate that one has to properly set MACOS_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET
> (or a suchlike thing
note: 'utimensat' has been marked as being introduced in macOS 10.13
here, but the deployment target is macOS 10.9.0
seems to indicate that one has to properly set MACOS_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET
(or a suchlike thing) to 10.13 or even bigger.
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 8:06 PM David Joyner wrote:
>
> Hi:
301 - 400 of 1818 matches
Mail list logo
