On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 3:01 PM Emmanuel Charpentier
wrote:
>
> In Google Groups, I can’t see the screenshot nor the notebook, but this is a
> FAQ, so I risk an answer :
>
> solve, used without algorithm= uses Maxima’s solver. The latter may introduce
> new variables to denote unknown,
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 2:27 PM 'Charles Bradshaw' via sage-support
wrote:
>
> More info:
> If I run my notebook code on https://sagecell.sagemath.org/ is see a huge
> page of errors begining:
sagecell does not take ipython notebooks, sorry, not a bug.
>
>
In Google Groups, I can’t see the screenshot nor the notebook, but this is
a FAQ, so I risk an answer :
solve, used without algorithm= uses Maxima’s solver. The latter may
introduce new variables to denote unknown, arbitrary, quantities : “zxxx”
denote integer arbitrary constants, “rxxx”
More info:
If I run my notebook code on https://sagecell.sagemath.org/ is see a huge
page of errors begining:
/home/sc_serv/sage/src/sage/calculus/calculus.py:2509: DeprecationWarning:
Importing union from here is deprecated; please use "from sage.misc.misc
import union" instead. See
OK One more time. I finally figured out how to attach the the notebook. I
hope it's in the right format.
In the process of playing with the probllem I have re-numbered the lines.
The pi*z1649 term now appears in line 5, 7 and 8
Where did the z come from??
Thanks for your patience.
On
the screenshot does not show lines 113 and 98 you refer to.
It might be better to send the notebook than the screenshot.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 8:40 PM 'Charles Bradshaw' via sage-support
wrote:
>
> My mistake, here is the screenshot
>
> On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 8:14:20 PM UTC
My mistake, here is the screenshot
On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 8:14:20 PM UTC dim...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 8:00 PM 'Charles Bradshaw' via sage-support
> wrote:
> >
> > In the attached screenshot line 'out [113]' and 'out [98]' please
> observe 2*pi*z5484
> > the
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 8:00 PM 'Charles Bradshaw' via sage-support
wrote:
>
> In the attached screenshot line 'out [113]' and 'out [98]' please observe
> 2*pi*z5484
> the attempt to evaluate: line [114] produces the error x5484 is not defined
there is no attachment.
>
> is this a bug or did
In the attached screenshot line 'out [113]' and 'out [98]' please observe
2*pi*z5484
the attempt to evaluate: line [114] produces the error x5484 is not defined
is this a bug or did I not understand something?
I am running Fedora 37 with the dnf installed
SageMath version 9.6, Release Date:
