Re: [sane-devel] scanimage does not recognize basic long options

2023-02-04 Thread Karl Weber
Hi, On Friday, 3 February 2023 21:11:11 CET Karl Weber wrote: > It is easy, to fix this. After > > if (opt->type == SANE_TYPE_GROUP) > continue; > > one may to add > > if (opt->name == NULL) > continue; The sources that come with my distribution, i.e. version 1.0.32, have the

Re: [sane-devel] scanimage does not recognize basic long options

2023-02-04 Thread Ralph Little
Hi, On 2023-02-04 01:15, Karl Weber wrote: Hi, On Friday, 3 February 2023 21:11:11 CET Karl Weber wrote: It is easy, to fix this. After if (opt->type == SANE_TYPE_GROUP) continue; one may to add if (opt->name == NULL) continue; The sources that come with my distribution,

Re: [sane-devel] scanimage does not recognize basic long options

2023-02-04 Thread Ralph Little
Hi, On 2023-02-04 10:38, Karl Weber wrote: Hi Ralf, On Saturday, 4 February 2023 18:06:41 CET Ralph Little wrote: The condition on SANE_OPTION_IS_SETTABLE(opt->cap) has been removed in version 1.1.1 and this causes the problem. I'm a bit confused by this comment. I thought that your issue

Re: [sane-devel] scanimage does not recognize basic long options

2023-02-04 Thread Karl Weber
Hi Ralf, On Saturday, 4 February 2023 18:06:41 CET Ralph Little wrote: > The condition on SANE_OPTION_IS_SETTABLE(opt->cap) has been removed in > version > > 1.1.1 and this causes the problem. > > I'm a bit confused by this comment. I thought that your issue was caused > by the backend sending

Re: [sane-devel] scanimage does not recognize basic long options

2023-02-04 Thread m. allan noah
I'm ok with breaking code freeze if you want On Sat, Feb 4, 2023, 2:41 PM Ralph Little wrote: > Hi, > > On 2023-02-04 10:38, Karl Weber wrote: > > Hi Ralf, > > > > On Saturday, 4 February 2023 18:06:41 CET Ralph Little wrote: > >> The condition on SANE_OPTION_IS_SETTABLE(opt->cap) has been

Re: [sane-devel] scanimage does not recognize basic long options

2023-02-04 Thread Ralph Little
Hi, I have checked in a change to scanimage in master and it should be in 1.2.1. @karl, perhaps pull the change and make sure it is good for you? Cheers, Ralph On 2023-02-04 11:47, m. allan noah wrote: I'm ok with breaking code freeze if you want On Sat, Feb 4, 2023, 2:41 PM Ralph Little

Re: [sane-devel] Happy new year- time for a sane-backends release!

2023-02-04 Thread m. allan noah
I have pushed a branch called 'release-1.2.x'. I don't have this 'towncrier' thing, so maybe you can run that and merge the release notes? allan On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 11:39 AM m. allan noah wrote: > Awesome, thanks! I'll probably take a first stab at it on the 4th, and see > if I can follow

Re: [sane-devel] Happy new year- time for a sane-backends release!

2023-02-04 Thread Ralph Little
Hi, In this case I didn't generate the towncrier files. It's a lot of faff if you don't do it as you go along. I just put them into a spreadsheet. I will try to generate the release notes from that. Cheers, Ralph On 2023-02-04 17:57, m. allan noah wrote: I have pushed a branch called

Re: [sane-devel] Happy new year- time for a sane-backends release!

2023-02-04 Thread m. allan noah
Awesome, thanks! I'm working on updating doc/releases.md, which I find to be hard to use. Maybe if you keep some notes on what you did, I can incorporate your method instead of towncrier. allan On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 9:12 PM Ralph Little wrote: > Hi, > In this case I didn't generate the

Re: [sane-devel] Happy new year- time for a sane-backends release!

2023-02-04 Thread Ralph Little
Hi, OK, I think I have done that. Because we are short on time I cut and pasted the release note fragments from my spreadsheet into the NEWS file with Apostrophe MD file editor and whipped them into shape manually. First time using it and it is pretty good. Obviously, this was a manual