On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, Theo Tulley wrote:
I have just bought a Digital Microscope (from Maplin) which works fine
on my laptop with Windows XP-Pro, but the provided software doesn't work
with LinuxMint-6 which is the only system on my PC, where I would get a
larger image.
Please, how can I
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Gerard Klaver wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 17:24 -0600, kilgota at banach.math.auburn.edu wrote:
Wishing everyone a prosperous, happy, and peaceful year 2009.
For a lark, I bought a rather worthless but very cheap gadget for myself
for Christmas. It is a very small
-0600 (CST)
From: kilg...@banach.math.auburn.edu
To: usb-storage at lists.one-eyed-alien.net
Subject: A keychain digital picture frame.
I wonder if anyone has ever encountered something like this. If not, then it is
a curious little thing, It is a small digital picture frame which will hold
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, m. allan noah wrote:
willing to bet the read only cdrom is just to hold the autoloader so
windows will run it, and the real key is the vendor defined c1
command. You will have to get logs while uploading some solid color
images, and see if you can figure the image
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, m. allan noah wrote:
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 2:42 PM, kilgota at banach.math.auburn.edu wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, m. allan noah wrote:
willing to bet the read only cdrom is just to hold the autoloader so
windows will run it, and the real key is the vendor defined c1
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, m. allan noah wrote:
Incidentally, c1h is not mentioned in s2-r10l.pdf.
yes it is- it is listed in the vendor (un-)defined list :)
It is a long document. A search turned up absolutely nothing.
because it is in a range- C0h should show up...
Thanks.
allan
--
The
to
find relevant documentation. I hope that someone can help me with the
question.
Theodore Kilgore
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 12:57:13 -0600 (CST)
From: kilg...@banach.math.auburn.edu
To: Pete Zaitcev zaitcev at redhat.com
Cc: usb-storage at lists.one-eyed
I have had some problems recently with usbsnoop (sniff-bin-1.8) which I wonder
if anyone else has encountered and, if so, whether any workarounds are known:
1. Contents of the window wherein the hardware is listed and one can choose to
install or uninstall are jumping or flickering
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008, m. allan noah wrote:
all three problems solved:
http://www.pcausa.com/Utilities/UsbSnoop/
allan
But will that new version run on Win2K? Says there it will not. Of course,
if that is the only solution I guess I have to do it.
Theodore Kilgore
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008, m. allan noah wrote:
did you try asking the hplip guys?
No. But I would be glad to do so. Can anyone help me with an appropriate
contact address?
Theodore Kilgore
allan
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:06 AM, kilgota at banach.math.auburn.edu wrote:
My wife's oldest
Hi,
Don't know about the scanner, but I do know a bit about the internals of
libgphoto2. The problem with the scanner is most probably similar to what
appears to happen with the camera:
With approximately 99% probability, I would say that your problem with the
camera is a permissions problem.
Well, it seems that you are well on the way to solving the problems. What
you have to do about the camera ought to be quite similar to what you have
to do about the scanner. The reason why I cannot give you more specific
advice is that I have no idea of the way that Hardy Heron is setting up
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008, m. allan noah wrote:
On 6/10/08, Daniel Gl?ckner daniel-gl at gmx.net wrote:
Hello Wang Mengqiang,
On 10 Jun 08 16:24, Wang Mengqiang wrote:
For example, you are building the high-way,
as we are talking about writing drivers, a more obvious analogy comes to
(Quote)
They even say:
---
If the program is already written using the non-free library,
perhaps it is too late to change the decision. You may as well
release the program as it stands, rather than not release it.
And here we see the problem, in a nutshell. My own course is quite similar
to Allan's, though I do my work for another project.
I think that what is going to have to happen, ultimately, is that some of
these hardware manufacturers are going to see if they can find a
competitive advantage by
On Sun, 8 Jun 2008, m. allan noah wrote:
On 6/8/08, kilgota at banach.math.auburn.edu
kilgota at banach.math.auburn.edu wrote:
[...]
Canon is a very big company, where one hand may not know what another
hand is doing. I personally have spent the last couple of years
negotiating an NDA
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008, Wang Mengqiang wrote:
Theodore Kilgore,
Thank you for your ardent reply.
I feel your earnest expectation to improve the communication with hardware
manufacture. But, very sorry, I am afraid I have no ability to take this
responsibility.
Thank you sharing the
Wang Mengqiang,
I am not one of the regular SANE developers, but I am quite active in
another, similar project, Gphoto, which supports digital still cameras. I
find this thread interesting because it raises issues which affect us all.
I hope very much that the SANE developers will not mind if
Sorry, I deleted the message which mentions this, by mistake. But just in
case it would help, I have supported several camera chips from SQ. In case
that anyone intends to pursue the business of scanners running the
SQ113(is this the right number, I forget?), it is obviously possible that
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, m. allan noah wrote:
On 1/12/08, kilgota at banach.math.auburn.edu wrote:
What I see in these images is, something like what I suspected could be a
possibility, or it could be something else.
well, that about covers all the possibilites :)
Yep. We should never
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008, Philip Aston wrote:
Yes I agree it was REALLY stupid but the penny dropped (about the black
hat and the spam or worse) immediately after that email, so I changed
the password, before sending the retraction in (my next email), thats
why no-one could access the account.
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Philip Aston wrote:
Listed as minimal support.
With the artec firmware 1200.usb installed, this scanner works with 2
bugs:
1 crashes @ 1200dpi, ok other resolutions-
2 probably more important, there are slight discolorations, the colour
is reproduced but slightly
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 13:19:58 -0600 (CST)
kilgota at banach.math.auburn.edu wrote:
Still subscribed to your list after all these years, since the time that
the Canon N640U came out. As you are debating about SVN, I thought I might
share some of
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 15:36:09 +0100
Julien BLACHE jb at jblache.org wrote:
m. allan noah kitno455 at gmail.com wrote:
can we have both svn and cvs enabled at the same time? if not, we
would have to migrate...
I think we can, but migrating is
when I am a long-time subscriber and get every month an automated e-mail
about that? I don't understand, and I don't understand just what steps I
am supposed to take to correct that, when I am already a subscriber.
Advice, please?
Theodore Kilgore
Hi,
Greetings from gphoto. We just got someone with an Argus DC-1512e write in
to us. The camera reports itself as 0x0979:0x0227 and from mfgr. Jeilin.
I went to the website of Jeilin, and they also claim to make scanner
chips. Thus, just in case I end up getting involved in supporting this
is the method to test this to see if I can gain access to the pictures
in the camera?
Thanks,
-Martin
kilg...@banach.math.auburn.edu wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, Martin wrote:
I don't have this folder on my system, libgphoto2/camlibs/
Does something have to be installed to have it?
Well
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Martin wrote:
I got this camera communicating with gphoto2 but the pictures are very under
exposed.
When I had my work laptop running Windoze XP, there were proper exposure and
clear to view and print.
So I'm not sure why the pictures are low brightness - and also
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, Martin wrote:
I realize that all of this is guessing experimental work, and so I greatly
appreciate all of your input, ideas and suggestions.
This is what the greater open source community is all about.
I have a learned a lot from this discussion group that I never
Martin,
Thanks for letting us know that the photo was mirrored, and thanks
for sending me the raw version of the photo. It came out pretty
much the same as it should for me, after I did the following special steps
while converting to PPM format:
Vertical flip (byte-reversal of entire image)
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Martin wrote:
First off, I noticed that when I execute gphoto2 it is running from 2.1.0
version.
After doing make and make install of version 2.1.6, where is the executable
of gphoto2 installed that I can run from that version?
gphoto2 and libgphoto2 are two
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005, Martin wrote:
The camera is identified as,
idVendor 0x0797 Grandtech Semiconductor Corp.
idProduct 0x8001 SmartCam
Hmmm. I will make some comments, about the output of lsusb -v,
below. The camera _may_ work with an existing driver, but it is not
obvious that it
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Martin wrote:
I installed libgphoto2-2.1.6.
Edited the source file pdc640.c in the directory,
libgphoto2-2.1.6/camlibs/polaroid/
and added the lines,
{Clever CAM 360, 0x797, 0x8001, {
jd350e,
BAYER_TILE_BGGR,
jd350e_postprocessing_and_flip,
scope%04i.ppm
}
},
Martin,
Gerard has given you very good advice. Permit me to expand on it a bit.
Also feel free to contact me personally, after checking whether your
camera is mass-storage and after comparing it to the gphoto2 list of
supported cameras (go to gphoto.org to see that list). If it is not
This works. I got a scan out of it.
Further remarks:
1. apparently I had to rmmod scanner first, or it was unhappy.
2. I had to run the program as root
3. It didn't want somehow to create the temporary file n670u.raw, but
after I did
touch n670u.raw
it went right ahead and did the scan and
35 matches
Mail list logo
